Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-025
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/25/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
10/26/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
11/07/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The Zoning Review Section approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. On sheets 2-5, revise the zoning classifications listed for the adjacent properties to PAD-12. The current drawings show the zoning of the adjacent properties as PAD-6 and OCR-2. 2. Dimension the width and length of the parallel visitor parking spaces located on street A. Minimum size shall be eight (8) feet wide by twenty three (23) feet in length. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro at (520) 791-5608 or e-mail Daniel.Castro@tucsonaz.gov |
11/10/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
11/22/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: November 22, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S05-025 Civano Block 2: Resubmittal(10/25/05) Tentative Plat Denied. Unable to find note indicating a public trail easement has been dedicated that corresponds with Common Areas “A” and “B”. |
12/13/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 13, 2005 Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85718 Subject: S05-025 Civano Block 2 Tentative Plat Dear Paul: Your submittal of October 25, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (parks and recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (parks and recreation, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 |
12/13/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-025 Civano Block 2 11/07/05 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (Irrigation Plan) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-97-SP-6A, Civano Revised IMPACT System, Civano Revised MOU NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan & Houghton Area Master Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: November 8, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7/11/05 REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 11/7/05 |