Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S05-012
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2005 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/19/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S05-012 LIBERTY VILLAGE/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: April 18, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Spell out Parkway of Lakeside Pw on Key Map. The street adjacent to lot 1 and CA “D” will need a street name. (This was overlooked on the first review.) jg |
| 04/25/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: LIBERTY VILLAGE Lots 1-94 S05-012 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated April 14, 2005. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along Golf Links Road and Lakeside Parkway proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. As you are aware, there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. A written request to have the facilities removed is necessary from the customer. We have received you request for a preliminary electrical design, the approximate completion date is May 16, 2005. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 04/27/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: Liberty Village RCP S05-012 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: April 27, 2005 DUE DATE: April 29, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Revise the development plan case number at the bottom of each sheet to read S05-012 instead of S05-112. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2. The text for the owner/developer information is struck over a portion of the keynote list. Revise. 3. Golf Links Road is designated both as a Major Street and Route and a Gateway Route by the MS&R Plan. Add a general note which states that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of LUC Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone, and LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 4. For microfilming and archiving purposes the minimum type size must be 12 point (0.12"). Many of the dimensions and other print on the elevation drawings and floor plans (sheets 6 and 7 of the d.p.) do not meet this minimum requirement. Revise as necessary to meet standard. DS 2-03.2.1.A.C 5. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of LUC 3.6.1.5 and DS 2-03.6.6. DS 2-10.3.2.E 6. For setbacks purposes building heights are measured above design grade elevation rather than from finished floor elevation. For clarity in verifying building setbacks revise elevation drawings on sheets 6 and 7 to include the height of the exterior building wall above the ground or to indicate the difference between grade and floor elevations. LUC 3.2.6.4 7. Due to proposed building heights being greater than 21 feet, revise all lot typical detail street setbacks (where not already specified) to indicate that the required street setbacks are the greater of 21 feet or height of exterior structure wall measured from edge of nearest travel lane. Provide additional lot typical information for lots 1 though 6 indicating that the required MS&R setback is the greater of 21 feet or height of exterior structure wall measured from back of future curb along Golf Links Road. LUC 3.2.6.5 8. Revise plat to label and dimension future MS&R curbs (or add MS&R typical street cross section) and future sight visibility triangles for Golf Links Road. DS 2-03.2.4.F DS 2-03.2.4.M 9. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/28/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/28/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/28/2005, SUBJECT: Liberty Village S05-012, T15S, R14E, SECTION 28 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on April 28, 2005 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: 1. Provide the size design calculations of the proposed erosion control pads and call out the dimensions on the drainage exhibits and the Tentative Plat. 2. Call out the erosion hazard setback on the drainage exhibits and the Tentative Plat. 3. According to Section 14.3 of the "Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management In Tucson, Arizona", the maintenance access ramps should be wide enough to accommodate vehicular access. The minimum width should be 15' and the ramp slope should not exceed 15 percent. Please be advised that maintenance ramps should be designed in such a way that does not allow access to vehicles except maintenance vehicles. Verify that the provided maintenance ramps conform to the requirements. Arcadis response to this comment states that "the access ramp has been added adjacent to lot 48 to access the channel". This is not clearly depicted on the drainage exhibit and the Tentative Plat. Tentative Plat/Development Plan: 1. Provide the correct S (yr)-______ subdivision case number according to D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1. (i.e. S05-012). 2. Show all existing easements as required by D.S.2-03.2.3.C. The 30' ingress/egress and P.U.E. shown on the Plat that was approved under case # S00-006, has not been clearly shown on the submitted Tentative Plat. Revise. 3. The Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT's) have not been dimensioned. Additionally, call out and dimension the proposed channels setback lines. 4. Key notes #9 points to the wrong structure adjacent to lot 54. 5. Key notes #4 points to the wrong structure adjacent to lot 6. 6. Add a note requires the removal of the existing entrance in the back of lot 8. 7. The maintenance access ramp to Channel 1 is not clearly depicted on the drainage report exhibits and the Tentative Plat. 8. Detail B/5 does not show filter fabric underneath the proposed riprap. All proposed rip rap should be underlined with filter fabric 9. Revise the Tentative Plat according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: The Landscape Plan is acceptable for Engineering and Floodplain review. Ensure that the proposed vegetation will not be in conflict with the required channel maintenance access ramps. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat and Drainage Report |
| 04/29/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S05-012 Liberty Village 04/28/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – NPPO Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-70-100 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY ROUTE: Golf Links COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/28/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Color Palette & Five-Sided elevations REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 04/25/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments S05-012 Liberty Village Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with Section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code as well as the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the South Pantano Area Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual. Allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of the clustered residential developments. The General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual state that larger developments should have a variety of housing unit types. This is to allow visual diversity and to prevent a dominating pattern of housing types. Please make a note on the plat that states that there shall be no more than two of the same unit type in a row. 2. The General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual all promote diverse color patterns for houses in residential subdivisions. The General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would not be inconsistent with the variety of colors currently surrounding the area. Please visit Urban Planning and Design’s website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf which features a palette of diverse Sonoran Desert Colors. The handout was created to showcase and promote the incorporation of all Sonoran Desert colors into the base and/or accent colors of building design. Please provide a color palette to demonstrate how this will be incorporated. Also, please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed adjacent to one another. The Design Guidelines Manual states to design side and rear building façades with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side façades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Please submit elevations illustrating how this requirement will be satisfied for units along Golf Links Road and Lakeside Parkway. To increase the usability of the recreation areas, please provide a wide range of shade trees from the Low Water Use Drought Tolerant List avoiding thorns at maturation. To increase appearance, shade, and longevity diversity, please provide an appropriate amount of long-living and diverse shade producing trees, including evergreens. Additionally, please label the amenities in the proposed common areas and illustrate that they will be handicapped accessible. |
| 05/02/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/02/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |