Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S04-190
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S04-190
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/04/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this development.
* Refuse service is approved for individual curbside service. Automative Plastic Containers (APC's) to be placed and removed from the curbside collection area on the day of service.
* Onsite storage area required for two ninety gallon APC's for each residence. Minimun area required is 3' x 6'.
01/05/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S04-190 Vactor Ranch 01/05/05

(x) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-96-01

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sabino Canyon - Tanque Verde N.P.

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A

COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/19/05

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(x) Resubmittal Required:
(x) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 01/05/05

Department of Urban Planning and Design
Vactor Ranch: S04-190

1. The tentative plat has an associated rezoning case (C9-96-01). The rezoning case has 16 conditions. Numerous relate to the Department of Urban Planning and Design’s review. None of the rezoning conditions that the Department of Urban Planning and Design needs to review are addressed in the one page tentative plat submittal. Please address all the rezoning conditions.

2. Please list all the rezoning conditions on the tentative plat.
01/10/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S04-190
CORONADO ENGINEERING
VACTOR RANCH
01/14/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: VACTOR RANCH
Lots 108-126
S04-190

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated
December 21, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time.
There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the
development. The facilities along with the easement recording information
must be shown on the plat prior to approval.

A copy of the plat with the approximate location of the existing facilities
is enclosed. There is an existing three phase transformer and primary
underground cable through the proposed lots. All relocation costs will be
billable to the developer.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative
Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional
plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including
water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have
any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745.


Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tep.com
Office: (520) 917-8745
Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668
Fax: (520) 917-8700
01/14/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: January 11, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-190 Vactor Ranch: Tentative Plat Review

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Denied. Rezoning conditions(case C9-96-01) not indicated or addressed.



Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
01/19/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Craig Gross DATE: January 19, 2005
Planning Administrator

SUBJECT: Vactor Ranch, 7300 E. Vactor Ranch Trail
Tentative Plat S04-190 (First Review)
T13S, R15E, Section 32

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report.

The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Re-label all commons areas in the following manner and this must be reflected on the Final Plat also. A keynote explaining the labels will be sufficient, ie.:
Common Area "A" - Streets
Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities
Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities
Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities
Common Area "E" - Landscaping
4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
6. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
8. 5' sidewalks are required along both street frontages per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A.
9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
10. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.
11. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
12. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
13. Show Subdivision plan number (S04-190) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
14. Show administrative address on plat.
15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
16. Please show a typical cross section of the street and call out the percentage of slopes.
17. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
19. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required with the grading plan. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information.

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage.
3. Existing drainage patterns shall be accepted and discharged at pre-developed locations or changing the drainage patterns, demonstrate no adverse impact on affected parcels and/streets.
4. Hydrologic data sheets for all drainage areas and the total volume of the 2-year event are required for computation of the retention volume requirements.
5. Provide details of the retention basin, including cross-sections and dimensions.
6. A Drainage report is required for parcels greater than 1 acre per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.1, therefore the Hydrology report is not acceptable.
7. The content and format of the Drainage report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3.
8. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report.
9. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/7300 E. Vactor Ranch CDRC
01/19/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP:

1. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing locations of no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 figure 21)

2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). Specifically at the intersection of the new street and Vactor Ranch Trail.

3. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.”

4. "Private" is misspelled as the designation on the existing roadways.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
01/20/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Submit a landscape and native plant preservation plan.
Aditional comments may apply pending receipt of the requested documents.

2) The RCP must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan and any of its components, including any applicable adopted area and neighborhood plans.
01/20/2005 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: January 18, 2005


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S04-190 Vactor Ranch T131532 (114-47)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add the section, township and range to the title block and the map and plat and the name of the parent subdivision. Also add the common areas to the title block.
The private street must be labeled as a common area.
Add the perimeter bearings and dimensions and add the interior bearings.
Add the complete curve data.
Add the road information for Vactor Ranch Trail and Vuelta Rancho Mesquite.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.





Susan King
01/21/2005 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied January 20, 2005

TO: Paul Nzomo, P.E., Coronado Engineering & Development

THRU:


FROM: ____________________________________
representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality

SUBJECT: Vactor Ranch, Lots 108-126, and Common Area A
- Submittal
S04-190


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Tanque Verde Interceptor and the Ina Road Wastewater Treatement Facility. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available, and provide a copy of that letter to this office. PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at 520-740-6500.

The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.

Based on our records for Vactor Ranch, Lots 1-107, Block A and Common Areas A-C (under case no. C12-96-12), this project would qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate.

All Sheets: Add the tentative plat case number, S04-190, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. Also, add cross reference no. C12-96-12 to the title block.

Sheet 1: The sewers serving these lots may be public. Revise General Note 10 to read:

THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS.

Sheet 1: Delete General Note 11.

Show the size and the plan numbers of the existing public sewers in the Vactor Ranch Trail and Vuelta Rancho Mesquite rights of way.

Show the manhole number (as shown on PCWMD's) base and section maps for the existing public sewer manhole that will be the point of connection to

Show the rim and invert elevations for the manhole that will be the point of connection to the public sewer system.

Show the proposed rim and invert elevation of each new manhole.

Show the size, length and slope (in %) of each section of sewer line.

We will require a revised, complete set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets in the set of bluclines increases, the review fee specified above must be increased by $50.00 for each additional sheet.


If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature.

Copy: Project
02/01/2005 CRAIG GROSS OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved no comments.
02/02/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection
02/03/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT: S04-190
Vactor Ranch, 108-126, and Common Area "A"
Tentative Plat - Residential Cluster Project

TRANSMITTAL: 02/03/05

DUE DATE: January 19, 2005

COMMENTS:

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is December 22, 2005.

2. Please address the following items related to the location map. DS 2-03.2.1.D

A. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as subdivisions, major streets, major watercourses, and railroads. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers.
B. The City's jurisdictional limits will be shown, if within the mapped area.

3. Please address the following items related to the title block.

A. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. (This is a re-subdivision of Block "A" previously platted.)
B. List the common areas in the title block.

4. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S04-190. List the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

5. Per the rezoning map, this site has gone through a rezoning and any rezoning conditions that were authorized at the time of rezoning are still applicable. Provide with the next submittal package a copy of the rezoning conditions as approved by Mayor and Council and a separate response letter that states how all the rezoning conditions will been met. The conditions must be listed on the tentative plat verbatim. The rezoning case C9-96-01 must be listed in the lower right corner of all sheets. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this issue. DS 2-03.2.2.B.3

6. All proposed or existing easements must be drawn and labeled on the plat. The location, purpose, width and recordation information of existing easements must be labeled on the plan. DS 2-03.2.3.C. and DS 2-03.2.4.J

7. The existing or proposed curb and sidewalk locations for both Vactor Ranch Trail and Vuelta Rancho Mesquite roads must be drawn, labeled, and dimensioned. DS 2-03.2.3.D

8. Remove the words Right-of-way from the plan. Per general note 20 the interior street is to be private. Label the street as private and as a separate common area. Label the Common Area designation for the street on the drawing and add it to the title block. DS 2-03.2.4.C

9. Label the adjacent zoning including the zoning across the street. DS 2-03.2.4.D

10. Parking on both sides of the street is required. Draw a cross section that depicts the construction and dimensions of the proposed street. Also the existing streets on which the boundary lots have frontage must be designed to provide on street parking. On street parking spaces must be provided within 150 feet of the property lines of the proposed boundary lots. The distance is not determined as the crow flies. It is determined based on the route necessary to get to from the parking spaces to the lots. Draw the requested detail drawings for the street cross section and depict the parking spaces based on an 8'x23 parking space. DS 2-03.2.3.G

11. Depict and label the perimeter boundary building setback based on the adjacent zoning and the street perimeter building setbacks. The street perimeter building setbacks from the existing street is to be based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure. The perimeter boundary building setbacks adjacent zoning R-1 is the greatest of 10 feet or ¾ the height of the structure.

Draw lot typical detail drawings for an interior lot and for a corner lot and depict and label the interior and street building setbacks inclusive of the principal structure and garage. List the proposed building heights of the structures. DS 2-10.3.1.A. and .B

12. Address the following items under the RCP data text block. DS 2-10.3.1.A -.D

a. Revise general note 1 to state the correct RCP designator RCP "9".
b. Revise general note 2 to correctly list the actual density proposed.
c. Revise the site coverage calculations based on the correct RCP designator.
d. Revise the required building setback listed as 20 feet from the curb to "the Greatest of 21' or the height of the structure from the back of curb".

13. If the project is less than four (4) acres in size, by gross area, submit drawings, photographs, or a combination of both, showing how the architectural compatibility requirements of Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3 of the LUC will be met. Ds 2-10.3.2.C

This site is less than 4 acres and must comply with this development standard. Submit the required documents as requested.

14. If copies of the CC&R's are available at this time submit copies with the next tentative plat submittal. DS 2-10.3.2.E

15. Address the following items related to the LUC RCP criteria.

a. When the RCP site area is less than four (4) acres, architectural design of the RCP must be compatible with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of those existing single-family detached or attached structures along the same block frontage and the block frontage across the street. If the RCP is proposed on a corner lot, then its design will also be compatible with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of existing residential development on the opposite lot corners. Architectural compatibility will be in compliance with design criteria in applicable adopted neighborhood or area plans.
b. All areas of an RCP, except those areas that fit under the definition of site coverage or are designated for the exclusive use of individual residents, shall be landscaped with water conserving, drought tolerant vegetation. (For specific plant material, see Development Standard 2-16.0.) Mini-oasis concepts are acceptable, provided the oasis area landscape requirements of Sec. 3.7.0, Landscaping and Screening Regulations are satisfied. (Ord. No. 9967, §3, 7/1/04)
c. Barrier-free accessibility for the elderly and physically disabled shall be provided to twenty-five (25) percent of the ground floor units and all common use areas, including parking areas, within the project.
d. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP.
e. Parking spaces required for visitors will be uniformly distributed throughout the project and may be located in parking areas or on streets designed with designated parking lanes. Additional parking spaces located on individual lots will not be considered to satisfy this requirement, as these spaces are located on private property and cannot be used by the guests of other residents.
f. If common parking areas are provided within the site area, they must meet the following requirements.
a. All parking areas shall comply with the vehicular use area requirements of Sec. 3.3.0.
b. No more than sixty (60)-parking spaces shall be located in any single outdoor parking area. Such parking areas will be separated by a minimum of thirty (30) feet, utilizing buildings and landscaping or just landscaping. The same PAAL may provide access to two (2) or more parking areas.
c. Every RCP shall have a pedestrian circulation system connecting all elements of the RCP to all units. The system shall be physically separated from the vehicular circulation system, except where the system intersects a PAAL or street.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04190tp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and CC&R's and additional requested documents
02/04/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed
12/23/2004 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
12/27/2004 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved December 27, 2004.
12/29/2004 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approv-Cond 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S04-190 VACTOR RANCH/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 12/28/04



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

NOTE: Label approved interior street name on Final Plat.
(suggestion: Vactor Ranch Place).

***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when
submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima
County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing
and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's
Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***