Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-188
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/14/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/20/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 20, 2006 TO: Steven Hill, P.E. Leadstar Engineering THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings, Lots 1-143 and Common Areas A-D Tentative Plat – 5th Submittal S04-188 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As requested on January 11, 2006 and on May 4, 2006, written authorization by the City of Tucson to grant public sewer easements is required. While Eric Wieduwilt (Pima County WMD) may have approved the design of the sewer, he is not employed by City of Tucson and thus this requirement has not been accomplished. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MET AT THE TENTATIVE PLAT STAGE FOR THIS TENTATIVE PLAT TO BE APPROVED. As previously requested on May 4, 2006, provide a copy of the signed agreement with WAPA. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MET AT THE TENTATIVE PLAT STAGE FOR THIS TENTATIVE PLAT TO BE APPROVED. SHEET 3. This sheet shows a large private sewer easement by final plat. What is this easement needed for? Please provide a detailed answer. SHEET 3. This sheet shows a label for an existing private sewer, however no sewer line is shown. Revise this information so that it is accurately shown and properly labeled. SHEETS 5 & 9. Sheet 5 indicates that there are existing on-site sewers, while sheet 9 indicates these sewers are proposed by a specific Pima County plan number. This information should be synchronized so that it is accurate. Existing sewers means that the sewer is in the ground and accepted for use, which is apparently not the case. Revise accordingly. SHEETS 4 & 8. Apply the previous comment to these two sheets as well. SHEET 8. The sewer easement shall include the section of sewer line that is not protected by the easement. Please revise as necessary and apply this revision to other sheets as required. SHEET 9. As previously requested on May 4, 2006, please label the existing public sewer easement protecting G-65-19 and show its corresponding recording information. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MET AT THE TENTATIVE PLAT STAGE FOR THIS TENTATIVE PLAT TO BE APPROVED. SHEET 8. A 35-foot inside return radius is required at all turns in a public sewer easement as explained in the PC/COT Standard Details. Revise the easement accordingly. SHEET 9. If manholes 10 and 11, and sewer reaches 10 and 11 are all proposed, please delete the Pima County plan number associated with them. If you wish to leave the Pima County plan number for these manholes and reaches, confirm that this information is accurate and also show the Pima County plan number associated with the rest of the project for consistency reasons. Apply this comment to the rest of the project as necessary. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 6th submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $195.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/22/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: Silverbell Crossings RCP S04-188 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: June 22, 2006 DUE DATE: July 13, 2006 The Zoning Review Section at Development Services verifies that the tentative plat meets the requirements of the Land Use Code, subject to the following requirements. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. Add the SCZ case number, date of approval and any conditions imposed in the SCZ notes on sheet 2 of 11. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 07/14/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-188 SILVERBELL CROSSING/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 7/13/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Baby Bruno Drive to Baby Bruno Way (2 places) on Sheet 5. Correct Baby Bruno Drive to Baby Bruno Way on sheets 6 & 7. Correct Kippy Drive to Kippy Trail on Sheet 7. es |
| 08/03/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings Tentative Plat 4th Re-submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-188 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, documentation from the property downstream, Geotechnical addenda, and the WAPA correspondence were submitted for review for the conditions of approval. Development Services Department Engineering Division has reviewed the received items and recommends approval. If you have questions, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/04/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 4, 2006 Steve Hill Leadstar Engineering 10101 Finance Center Drive Tucson, AZ 85710 Subject: S04-188 Silverbell Crossing Tentative Plat Dear Steve: Your submittal of June 15, 2006, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (addressing, wastewater, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 571-1961 |