Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-188
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/04/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 4, 2006 TO: Steven Hill, P.E. Leadstar Engineering THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings, Lots 1-143 and Common Areas A-D Tentative Plat – 4th Submittal S04-188 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As requested on January 11, 2006, written authorization by the City of Tucson to grant public sewer easements is required. While Eric Wieduwilt (Pima County WMD) may have approved the design of the sewer, he is not employed by City of Tucson and thus this requirement has not been accomplished. Copy of the signed agreement with WAPA is not attached with your submittal as stated in your response letter. Please submit this agreement. Be aware that, as stated by Eric Wieduwilts comments, a formal variance request will be required prior to approval of the sewer improvement plans for this project. Without this signed variance, the sewer improvement plans may not be approved. SHEET 4. Delete the sewer easement across common area C. SHEET 8. Remove the sewer easement label on lot 40. SHEET 8. The sewer easement shall include the section of sewer line that is not protected by the easement. Please revise as necessary and apply this revision to other sheets as required. SHEET 9. Label the existing public sewer easement protecting G-65-19 and show its corresponding recording information. SHEETS 3- 9. Revise the sewer design so that the proposed public sewer is properly labeled. Several sewer reaches and manholes are labeled as existing, however they are proposed. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 5th submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $117.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/12/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) The final approval for variance case C10-04-30 was subject to the applicant working with Parks and Recreation to improve the slope along the north boundary. Provide documentation of efforts to obtain an easement for slope and/or landscaping to soften the appearance. Revise the plat to include revised plans for the area if the easement is to be granted. 2) Approval of a scenic corridor zone application is required prior to tentative plat approval. |
| 05/16/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: Silverbell Crossings RCP S04-188 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: May 16, 2006 DUE DATE: May 16, 2006 1. Revise the proposed density stated in RCP general notes 1 and 2 to be consistent and correct. Based on the number of units proposed (143) and the site area given (31.69 acres), the correct proposed density is 4.51 units per acre. 2. The Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) application must be approved before the tentative plat can be approved. Include the SCZ case number, date of approval and any conditions imposed in the SCZ general notes. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/22/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-188 SILVERBELL CROSSING/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 5/18/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Baby Bruno and Bruno Baby cannot both be used. Please choose another street name. Change Kellen Canyon Avenue to Court on pg. 4. Change Kippy Drive to Trail on pg. 7. es |
| 05/24/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: May 24, 2006 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings Tentative Plat 3rd Re-submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-188 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, Drainage addendum, copy of title report, geotechnical report, and response letter were received on May 2, 2006. Development Services Department Engineering Division has reviewed the received items and recommends conditional approval. TENTATIVE PLAT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Show basin setback per geotechnical report for lots 98-101. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.6: Label slope details to include "hand placed" rip rap per the variance. 3) Provide the remaining documentation: a) Per D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Provide copy of geotechnical addenda regarding the details showing slopes that exceed 2:1 (H:V). b) DS Sec.2-03.2.3: Provide documentation from WAPA regarding acceptance of the proposed improvements within the WAPA easement. c) Submit Golf Course correspondence that verifies acceptance of flows from project as shown on the proposed Tentative Plat. 4) The docket and page for both the south slope / access easement and the drainage easement for the pipe from basin to Golf Course must be provided at Final Plat review stage. Submit revised Tentative Plat, documentation from the property downstream, Geotechnical addenda, and the WAPA correspondence. If you have questions or would like to schedule the meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/03/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 3 2006 Steve Hill Leadstar Engineering 10101 Finance Center Drive Tucson, AZ 85710 Subject: S04-188 Silverbell Crossing Tentative Plat Dear Steve: Your submittal of May 2, 2005, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (zoning, engineering, addressing, wastewater, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (zoning, engineering, DSD) 2 Copies All additional items requested by Landscape and Engineering Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 571-1961 |