Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S04-181
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
687 S BONANZA AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S04-181
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/04/2005 MARILYN KALTHOFF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond January 4, 2005

TO: Greg Carlson, P.E.
Greg Carlson Engineering, L.L.C.

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Desert Enclave, Lots 1-28 and Common Areas A-C
Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal
S04-181

The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

1. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter.

2. Based on our evaluation of the project site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

3. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-181, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

4. SHEET 4. While the design configuration of manholes 2, 3 and 4 is correct, this specific project may use a one manhole intersection as long as it is a 5-foot diameter manhole. Please revise the current design to show 1 manhole at this location.

5. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
01/05/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved 268 estimated trips in 24 hrs.
01/06/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Craig Gross DATE: January 6, 2005
Planning Administrator
SUBJECT: Desert Enclave
Tentative Plat S04-181 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 14

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report.

The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Tentative Plat:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual capacity. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility and this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels will be sufficient, ie.:
Common Area "A" - Streets
Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities
Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities
Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities Common Area "E" - Landscaping
4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The SVT's are not drawn correct using a 15' stem side. The stem side measurement is 20'.
5. Please provide a timetable for completing a CLOMR and/or LOMR for the revision to the floodplain of the federally mapped Estes Wash. This review was done assuming the acceptance of the CLOMR and/or LOMR by FEMA. Should the CLOMR be denied or significantly modified form it's present form, a new review will be required.
6. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. Additional HC ramps will be required at mid-block and at other required locations.
7. The Estes wash and the unnamed wash are listed in the TDOT web site as being Xeroiparian Intermediate Habitat. These washes will use the W.A.S.H. wash ordinance as conditions of development. This includes but not limited to the 50' resource zone and Mitigation plans.
8. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
9. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
11. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. The future R/W for Bonanza Avenue is 64'.
12. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Is there an easement for the OHE that crosses the property?
13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
14. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.
15. Show Tentative plat number (S04-181) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
16. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address.
17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
18. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
19. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
20. Edit note number 16 to read: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". The present note is too specific.
21. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan will be required along with the grading plan. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information.

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage.
3. Drainage patterns shall not be altered. Drainage must enter and exit the site in the same place and manner.
4. Provide an existing watershed map and for the property itself.
5. The Estes wash and the unnamed wash are listed in the TDOT web site as being Xeroiparian Intermediate Habitat. These washes will use the W.A.S.H. wash ordinance as conditions of development. This includes but not limited to the 50' resource zone and Mitigation plans.
6. It seems that there is an unnamed wash that discharges at the Northwest portion of the property that may also may be regulartory flow and subject to 1' above the BFE. Address as necessary.
7. Show the project address on the cover of the DR.
8. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/Desert Enclave CDRC
01/06/2005 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: January 6, 2005


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S04-181 Desert Enclave T141514 (133-39)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.







Susan King
01/10/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: DESERT ENCLAVE
Lots 1-28
S04-181

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated
December 6, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time.


There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the
development. The facilities along with the easement recording information
must be shown on the plat prior to approval. If an existing easement is not
found add a dimensioned easement by prescription and a general note that the
facilities will be abandoned. All relocation costs will be billable to the
developer.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative
Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional
plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including
water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have
any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745.


Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tep.com
Office: (520) 917-8745
Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668
Fax: (520) 917-8700
01/10/2005 DOROTHY ROBLES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved no comments/objections
01/10/2005 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
Desert Enclave
S04-181
Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL: January 10, 2005
DUE DATE: Jaunuary 8, 2004


1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before December 9, 2005.
LUC 4.1.7.1

2. Please place the S04-181 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

3. Revise general note 3 to read: " …. Subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.7.1.E, .F, .G and .H." LUC 2.3.4.2.A.1

4. Revise parking calculation in general note 18 to be complete and accurate. In addition to the required on-street guest parking spaces a minimum of two off-street spaces are required per dwelling unit. Because single family dwellings in the R-1 zone are also subject to the additional parking reqiremetns set forth in LUC 3.5.7.1.G and .H, provide typical floor plans of each model as part of the tentative plat to demonstrate compliance.
LUC 3.3.4
DS 3-05.2.4.A.6
DS 2-03.2.4.G
DS 3-05.2.4.A.1
DS 3-01.2.4.D

5. Revise typical lot setback detail on sheet 3 of 5. The required perimeter yard building setback in the R-1 zone is the greater of 6 feet and 2/3 height of exterior structure wall. Also, in this setback detail specify that the the required 19 feet from back of sidewalk, 18 feet (revise from 18.5 feet from property line to read 18 feet) from property line only apply to front entry garages and carports.
LUC 3.2.6.4
LUC 3.2.6.5

6. Provide a lot coverage calculation on the lot typical. Show an example of the largest unit with the largest vehicle use area proposed to show that all lots will meet code. Dimension perimeter yard building setbacks to lot lines. The required minimum bldg. setback is the greater of 6 feet or 2/3 height for non-RCP lots in the R-2 zone
LUC 3.2.9

7. CC&R's must be provided for review and approval prior to approval of final plat.
DS 2-03.6.6

8. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans.
DS 2-07.2.1.A


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
01/10/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: January 7, 2004

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-181 Desert Enclave: Tentative Plat Review

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Denied.
Indicate “public, non-motorized recreational trail easement”.
Show trail easement over the whole of the 100-year floodplain limits of Este Wash within the subject parcel including an additional 12 ft.


Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
01/11/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to delineate areas to remain natural. DS 2-07.2.2

2) Indicate limits of grading on the landscape plan.
DS 2-07.2.2

3) Revise the tentative plat and the landscape plan to resolve apparent conflicts between the proposed treatment of Common Area A. The landscape plan indicates plantings in locations where the plat shows grouted rip-rap.

4) Retention basins are required to comply with the design criteria of DS 10-01. LUC 3.7.4.3.A
Revise the basin slopes to comply with the requirements of p. 78 of DS 10-01.

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. An ERZ submittal may be required if development impacts the floodplain.
01/12/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed
12/10/2004 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S04-181 DESERT ENCLAVE / TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2004



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1: Change 36-94 to 55-32 on Location Plan.

2: Change Kenyon Place to Drive on pgs 1 & 2.
12/10/2004 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
12/13/2004 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved December 13, 2004,
12/14/2004 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S04-181
GREG CARLSON ENGINEERING. LLC
DESERT ENCLAVE
12/14/2004 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * No known landfills w/in 1000 feet of this development.
* OK for curbside service. APC's to be placed and removed from the curb on collection day.
12/29/2004 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP:

1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.”

2. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing locations of no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 figure 21)

3. All SVT's as depicted and labeled are oversized. See DS3-01.5.3 for proper sizing. Bonanza is a collector street. All new roads built as part of this development will be local streets.

4. Both cul-de-sac streets exceed 600' in length. Accordingly, the entrance drive as depicted in section B/5 will need to be widened to 32' of pavement. (DS 3-01.6.2.B.4)

5. Keynote 2, sheet 4 calls out vertical curbing. As depicted in plan view and in section B/5 it is wedge curb. Correct this discrepancy.

6. Add an access ramp across the North/South running street near the back of either lot 13 or 14 and across from either of the ramps at lot 1 or 28 to facilitate pedestrian circulation.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
12/30/2004 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approv-Cond DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S04-181 Desert Enclave 12/30/04

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-08

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/06/04

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(XXXX) Resubmittal Not Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 12/29/04
Urban Planning and Design Comments
S04-181 Desert Enclave

In addition, to reviewing the proposed project for conformance with Plan policies, the plans are also being reviewed for conformance with the Mayor and Council conditions, as found on the City Clerk's letter dated September 13, 2004.

Condition #9 should be corrected to read:

Owner/developer shall provide a natural landscape buffer a minimum of 30 feet in width along the east side and a minimum of 25 feet in width along the north side of the subject parcel. Planting density and plant species used in the buffer shall be subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation Department. Native trees shall be planted a maximum of 30 feet apart in the buffer. An irrigation system shall be installed in the buffer.


This addition can be verified by DSD staff.