Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-178
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-178 Rio Vista Condominiums Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: January 3, 2005 DUE DATE: January 1, 2005 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before December 2, 2005. 2. Fill in the S04-178 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. As condominium area is measured in cubic feet, provide the interior height of the units and the square footage of each unit so that the air volume calculations on sheet 22 of 22 can be verified. 4. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of DS 2-03.6.6 and 3.6.1.5. 5. As indicated in the general notes, the property is subject to a rezoning. Place the case number C15-94-4 in the lower right hand corner of the plat. List all City of Tucson conditions of rezoning, as adopted by Mayor & Council for this case on the development plan. Also, add the annexation case number to the lower right hand corner of the plat. DS 2-05.2.1.K 6. In the first line of the legal description for parcel 2 revise text to read: "Section 20". Also, revise the legal descriptions in both the title block and in the location map to be correct. DS 2-03.2.1.G.3 7. Revise the maximum allowed building height in the data to read 40 feet per rezoning condition 1.a, which is more restrictive that the RCP-7 building height maximum of 40 feet. 8. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 requires that 25% of all units be provided with barrier-free accessibility. Please provide a general note so stating and list which units will be barrier-free. Also, provide a drawing detailing how accessibility will be accomplished. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 DS 2-10.3.1.D 9. Add a general note to the plat, which details the requirements for completion of project amenities and site improvements as stated in LUC 3.6.1.4.H. LUC 3.6.1.4.H 10. Revise the restriction in the 5th line of general note 13 to specify that the proposal is subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F. 11. Remove reference to "density bonus" in the last line of general note 13. No increase over the maximum allowed density of 44 units per acre is proposed for this development. 12. Provide the recordation information and show the location with a keynote (as was done for the utility easements) of the vehicle/pedestrian access easement to the property from the Ago Farms subdivision to the north. DS 2-03.2.3.C 13. The required bldg. setback to adjacent SR zoned property is 25 feet. Based on bldg. setbacks detailed on sheet 5 of 22 it appears that proposed buildings 14 and 16 do not meet setback requirements to adjacent Rillito River Park. Also, the required bldg. setback to adjacent R-3 property is the greater of 10 feet or ¾ height of exterior structure wall. The proposed garages do not meet this bldg. Setback requirement to the north property line. Revise. LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-03.2.4.M 14. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") for microfilming purposes. Revise all text (such as the parcel dimensions and bearings, the parking nunber indicators, and other labels on sheet 2 of 22) which does not meet this minimum archiving standard. DS 2-03.2.1.C 15. Based on the square footage of building footprint and vehicle use area given in the site calculation area, the lot coverage provided of 31.4% is incorrect. Revise calculation of site coverage percentage to reflect the actual building plus vehicle use areas divided by the total site area. LUC 3.2.9 16. Sidewalks must be 4-foot clear in all places for accessibility. At the north corner of building 10 (with a 6.3-foot distance proposed between building and front of parking space) the vehicle overhang (standard 2-½ feet) will restrict the sidewalk clear area to less than 4 feet. Revise as required. DS 2-08 17. Bicycle parking must be provided based on requirements listed in the Residential Use Group in LUC 3.3.4. Revise plat to show bicycle parking calculations, the location of bicycle parking on the drawings, and add a fully dimensioned detail showing the configuration of bicycle parking spaces, including the required 5-foot area for maneuvering bicycles into spaces. LUC 3.3.4 DS 2-09 DS 2-05.2.4.Q 18. General notes 11 and 23 are the same. Remove one of these notes. 19. Detail any proposed freestanding lighting and signage on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.W 20. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 01/05/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: January 4, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-178 Rio Vista: Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Provide a minimum 50 ft wide corridor for the Rillito River Park. Provide an access route from the Camino Ecuela Wash southern ramp location to the Rillito River Park Construct the segment of the Rillito River Park corresponding to the subject development’s frontage on the Rillito River. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/06/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 6, 2005 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Rio Vista Tentative Plat S04-178 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 20 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. General Comments 1. Explain which of the development proposals discussed with Matt Flick is intended for this project. The project scheduling relative to the approval of the Pima County LOMR will affect the review. Include a discussion of the progress Pima County is making toward approval of the LOMR removing the site from the A zone. This discussion may be within the response letter. 2. Provide evidence that the developers of this project have permission to perform maintenance in the "Camino Escuela Wash." The permission to maintain the wash must be permanent and ongoing. Include a discussion of the required routine maintenance that will need to be performed in the future. Include language in the CC&Rs or Condominium agreements that ensure that the maintenance will be performed as needed in the future. 3. Explain in the drainage report and label on the nature of the drainage easement along the Camino Real Wash. Revise the label to indicate whether it is a public or private easement. Describe the maintenance responsibilities for the drainageway. Indicate whether the drainageway will be maintained by the Condominium Association or by the Flood Control District. Tentative Plat 4. Add a note to the tentative plat identifying the lots/buildings that must have a floodplain use permit for construction. "A floodplain use permit and/or lowest floor elevation certificates are required for the following buildings:____" (DS 2-03.2.2.C.2.b) 5. Provide 100-year water surface contours for each of the watercourses. Distances between water surface contours should not exceed 200 feet. Include the symbol in the legend. (DS 2-03.2.3.J) 6. Show the City's jurisdictional limits on the project location map. (Ds 2-03.2.1.D.4) 7. The font size for all lettering on the plan must be 12 point or greater. Revise all sheets as applicable. (DS 2-03.2.1.C) Drainage Report 8. Revise the statement on Page 5 of the Drainage Report that the site is no longer in Zone A. The CLOMR does not change the Special Flood Hazard Area designation. The designation will change when a LOMR is issued. Revise the corresponding statement on pages 10 and 13 as well. 9. Address the depth of flow in PAAL. Demonstrate that the depth in the PAAL will be less than one foot in the 100-year event. Provide calculations for the drainage structures within the project area to show that sufficient capacity is provided. Include a discussion of the capacity and discharge through the 54-inch pipe into the Rillito. Please note that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required as part of the grading permit submittal. Submit a revised TP, and a revised DR. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 01/07/2005 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/10/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments/objections. |
| 01/10/2005 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: December 30, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-178 Rio Vista T131420 (108-25) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove shading, hatching and stippling. Add the perimeter boundaries on each sheet. On sheet 5 the rest of the subdivision needs to be shown. There is room to the left to add the bottom portion with match lines. Label the common areas and add the square footages. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 01/10/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/03/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/06/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | The Tentative Plat is Denied December 06,2004. 1. Provide complete site plan indicating vehicular access to River Road. 2. A minimum 20 feet wide, paved fire apparatus access roadway must be provided and extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of all structures. An approved turnaround must be provided for dead-end access roadways. Buildings 16 and 17 do not comply. 3. Indicate locations for Fire Lane signs on plan. 4. Provide a General Note stating: "Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the Developer in accordance with the Tfucson Fire Code." |
| 12/08/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse enclosure detail requires a 10' clear inside dimension. (Side wall protection should be outside the 10' clear area and be with in two feet of the front enge and spaced at 4' maximum spacing. * No recycling provisions stated for the complex. * A 14' by 40' clear area is required in front ot the enclosure. For the enclosures shown the clear area is in conflict with parking and curbing is shown with in the area. For corrects a reduced angle of thirty degree or a setback of approximately fifteen feet from the PAAL to the enclosure would correct the conflict and improve service access. * Enclosure in the SE corner of the complex requires the service vehicle to back up to far to change directions. * The center refuse enclosure by buildings 6 and 8 if relocated would elimenate the service vehicles from driving through the center of the complex. |
| 12/10/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-178 LANDMARK ENGINEERING, INC. RIO VISTA |
| 12/17/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-178 Rio Vista 12/16/04 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C15-97-03, Co9-95-4 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: December 30, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 12/16/04 Please place all conditions of Annexation/Rezoning on the development plan/tentative plat. Please identify all street and security lighting on the tentative plat. Lighting shall be shielded or directed away from adjacent residential uses and mounted no higher than fifteen (15) feet. A covenant is required to be recorded that holds both the City and County harmless in the event of flooding. This is required prior to approval of the development plan/tentative plat. Please provide a copy of this covenant. A cross access agreement is required to allow access to residents, both vehicular and pedestrian access, from River Road, across the north parcel to this parcel. Please provide a copy of this document. To allow residents access to the Rillito River Linear Park, openings in the south wall and paths are to be provided. A minimum of three (3) openings should be provided, spaced evenly along the south property line, and with a five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk that connects to the proposed five (5) foot wide pedestrian sidewalk shown. Preferred location and size of wall openings can be verified by Glenn Hicks, City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, (520) 791-4873 x 215. |
| 12/21/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org S04-178 Rio Vista 12/20/2004 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Widen to 4 lanes River Rd (Campbell to Hacienda del Sol) Yes 2006 31,500 24,000 2 43,000 42,679 4 1,195 None Programmed bike lane with striped shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 12/22/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: RIO VISTA 204 Units S04-178 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated December 1, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities north of the project proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within twenty two (22) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 12/28/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide screening of the vehicular use area (VUA) along the north, east, and west property boundaries per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 5' high masonry walls are required where VUA's are located within 100' feet of residential or office zones. 2) Ensure that refuse storage areas are screened from adjacent uses per LUC 3.7.2-I. Details of storage areas should include information on proposed screening gates. 3) Include a basic irrigation design with the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.C 4) Verify that all protected plants listed on the inventory can be located on the aerial photo. DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 Revise plans as requested by other agencies and submit all revised plans for review. |
| 12/29/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | >>> Dale Kelch 12/28/2004 11:03:25 AM >>> Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. A Category II TIA shall be submitted and approved for this development PRIOR to TP approval. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/29/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-178 RIO VISTA / TENTATIVE PLAT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: DECEMBER 28, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Correct descriptions below Location Map and all Title Blocks. 2: Label Building 3 on sheets 3 and 6. 3: Label Building 14 on sheets 5 and 8. 4: Is there a main entrance into this project? |
| 12/30/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 29, 2004 TO: E. Bruce Wilson, P.E. Landmark Engineering, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Rio Vista Tentative Plat/Development Plan - 1st Submittal S04-178 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. 2. Based on our evaluation of historical records for the sewer improvement district, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-178, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. 4. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 5 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 5. SHEET 1. As found in the Pima County Development Plan Requirements, section J.2.b, please revise General Note 10 and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F). 6. SHEET 1. Add the following General Notes MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 7. SHEETS 6-8. Show and label the existing public sewer easements along with their corresponding recording information. 8. SHEETS 6-8. Show the layout of the existing public sewers including the Pima County plan number, diameter, rim elevations and invert elevations. 9. Revise sewer line S10 to be at a minimum one percent slope. 10. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |