Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-175
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2005 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/22/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-175 ENCLAVE AT SARNOFF / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: APRIL 22, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 05/04/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval at this time. Revise all plans as necessary. Resubmittal of all plans is required. 1) The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: A. Legal description and correct address of site, if applicable. B. Cross-reference to: Subdivision case; Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. C. The name, address, and phone number of the individual who prepared the landscape plan. 2) The following items are required elements of the landscape plan: Maintenance Schedule, Grading Information, Irrigation Plan, Construction Details. DS 2-07.0 3) Revise the plans to provide a street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1. The landscape border shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). The subdivision CC&Rs and shall reference the maintenance standards in Sec. 3.7.6 4) Landscape borders, common areas, and adjacent right-of-way areas are required to comply with the dust control provisions of LUC 3.7.2.7. Revise plans as necessary. Reference the native seed list in DS 9-06 Exhibit 1 for the basin area. Note that decomposed granite will be installed in the right of way areas. Consult with TDOT for specs on decomposed granite and requirements for a pedestrian path. 5) Correct the sheet numbering on the NPP plan. 6) Identify the preparer of the NPP plan. Preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan and on-site monitoring as required under Sec. 3.8.6.7.D shall be performed by a plant professional, such as: A. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture. B. A landscape architect. C. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. 7) The native plant inventory and preservation plan is to include the elements specified in DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 & DS 2-15.3.4.A. 8) Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.B Revise all plans as necessary. 9) Basin sections indicate that the basins may be used for recreational purposes. This is highly desirable, however access slopes of 8:1 or flatter must be coordinated with these zones and there shall be a maximum of 100 feet to the base of an access slope or to a 4: basin side slope. DS 10-01.3.6 |
| 05/05/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: May 5, 2005 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Enclave at Sarnoff Tentative plat S04-175 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 28 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative plat. The Tentative Plat (TP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Submit a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Show the benchmark locations or tie to the nearest section and all information listed per 2-03.2.3.A. 3. Spot elevations shall be provided in all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels and at selected points per 2-03.2.3.1. Additional spot elevations are required for the Ret/Det basin. 4. Include on the TP the following requirements per 2-03.2.4.L.1 and 4. 5. Show where x-sections (2/2 and 3/2) on the plan view of basin where they were taken. It seems that the adjacent pad may be significantly higher than what is shown on the ret./det. basin x-sections. The x-section that was modified shows the condition hypothetically, spot elevations and slope percentages are required in order to convey proposed the conditions as they occur in the field. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. Per pervious comment. 8. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. The response letter reads that a note was added to the TP for this purpose. I looked for the note on the TP, but I cannot find it. Perhaps I overlooked the note. Drainage Report: 1. Submit a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The DR has been accepted for TP purposes only. 3. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. Per previous comment. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Enclave at Sarnoff CDRC 2 |
| 05/06/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The Zoning Review Section approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. Future curb is not labeled on the plat as requested in previous review comments dated December 23, 2004. The face of future curb is located 12 feet in front of the right-of-way line along Escalante Road. Label and dimension future curb on plat. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro at (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/10/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/10/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |