Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-166
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/30/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved June 30, 2005. |
| 07/07/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-166 PLACITA MARIPOSA/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 7/06/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Resub of Southland Park B. 9, P. 25 to Southland Park B. 5, P. 58 on pg. 2. 2.) Mariposa is a duplicate street name. Also Camino and Placita cannot be used together. They are both prefixes. Placita or Corte must be used with the new street name. Please submit a list of street names to check for duplication. es |
| 07/08/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans as requested by other agencies and as requested below. 1) Common Area 'B' along Drexel Road is required to be screened per LUC 3.7.3 and DS 2-06.3.7 2) A street landscape border is required along Drexel Road. LUC Table 3.7.2-I The landscape border is proposed in portions of Drexel Road right-of-way. Provide verification of approval, in writing, by the City Engineer for right-of-way landscaping. 3) Dust control is required for landscape areas, retention/detention basins, unpaved/undeveloped spaces and the adjacent Drexel Road right of way area. Revise the landscape plans to specify the proposed dust control treatments for all areas. LUC 3.7.2.7, LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 4) A masonry screen wall is required for the guest parking area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the tentative plat and landscape plans to provide the required screen wall between the parking area and the adjacent residentially zoned property to the south. 5) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Revise the plans to provide a barrier for the guest parking area along Drexel Road. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 6) Show future sight visibility triangles, based on the future curb location, on the tentative plat and landscape plans. Revise the landscape plans to use plants that conform to the sight visibility criteria within the designated SVT's. Shrubs that typically grow taller than thirty inches in height are to be located outside of the SVT's. 7) Dimension the street landscape border along Drexel Road on the landscape plans. Identify Common Area'B'. 8) Revise the grading plans and the tentative plat to show the same design for the basin in Common Area 'A'. Note the slope ratios on the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2.B 9) Submit a native plant preservation plan. LUC 3.8 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND A REVISED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN/APPLICATION IS REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL PHOTOS ARE REQUIRED. |
| 07/11/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: Colonia Mariposa S04-166 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: July 14, 2005 DUE DATE: July 14, 2005 1. Add the S04-166 number in or near the title block in the lower right hand corner of sheet 3 of 3 (Water Service Plan). DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 2. If this is not a Residential Cluster Project (RCP) subdivision remove all general notes which refer to RCP requirements. RCP notes 16 and 19 should be removed since they only apply to RCP subdivisions. DS 2-10 LUC 3.6.1 3. Add a note stating that the plat is designed to meet the criteria of Sec 2.8.3, Major Streets & Routes setback Zone. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 4. Provide elevation drawings to show how required building setbacks are met based on height. For non-RCP lots proposed for single family homes in the R-2 zone the required perimeter yard setbacks are based on the greater of 6 feet or 2/3 the height of exterior building wall. LUC 3.2.6.4 LUC 3.2.6.5 5. Show future sight visibility triangles at the intersection of the proposed public street and Drexel Road. The future curb and sidewalk locations along Drexel Road must be shown and dimensioned from street monument lines on site plan per the MS&R plan. DS 2-03.2.4.M DS 2-03.2.3.D DS 2-03.2.4.F 6. Visitor parking must be usable by all residents of the project and cannot be located on a residentially zoned lots for use by other than the owner of the lot on which the parking is located. The visitor parking spaces must be evenly distributed and available on both sides of the street, or in common parking areas, within 150 feet of all lots within the subdivision. Revise as necessary. DS 3-05.2.4.A.6 DS 2-03.2.4.G DS 3-05.2.4.A.1 DS 3-01.2.4.D 7. Add the adjacent zoning to the plat. DS 2-03.2.3.J 8. Revise note 18 to be accurate since 5,204 square feet is neither the minimum required lot size nor the minimum proposed lot size. The minimum required lot size is 5,000 square feet and based on the drawing, the minimum proposed lot size is 5,406 square feet. 9. Add a general note stating the development designator is "I". Also add a note stating that this R-2 development is subject to 3.5.7.1.F. LUC 2.3.5.2.A.1 10. Add the name of the drainage feature (Rodeo Wash) to the location map. DS 2-03.2.1.D.2 11. Include the description of common areas in the title block, so that it reads "Lots 1-18 and Common Areas A, B, and C". Provide the square footages dimensions of all common areas. Clearly delineate all lots and common areas in a surveyable manner, with dimensions of curves included. Data for only one curve (number 1) is given on sheet 2 of 2. Provide other curve data as well. Add the docket and page of recordation for any proposed easements or state that they are "by final plat". DS 2-03.2.4.J 12. Dimension the back-up spur at the end of a row of parking on lots 17 and 18. The spur must be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and the buildings or other obstructions over six (6) inches in height. Dimension this additional 3-foot space between the end of the back-up spur and the fence at the southern edge of the parking area located on lots 11 and 12. DS 3-05.2.2.D 13. Lots 1, 2, 12, 17 and 18 have parking lots in the street perimeter yard and require 10-foot street landscape borders measured from the street property line. The landscape border shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). The subdivision CC&Rs shall referencethe maintenance standards in LUC Sec. 3.7.6. Revise plan. LUC 3.7.2.4.A 14. Lot 10 does not have any visitor parking proposed. Revise plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 07/13/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-166 Colonia Mariposa 7/13/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/12/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 12/06/04 () () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 7/11/05 |
| 07/13/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Provide the existing ROW width, recordation data, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) Show and label both existing and future ROW (DS 2-03.2.3.D) This particularly applies to existing and future ROW on Drexel Road. There is no recordation information presented for Drexel Road. Am I to assume that the 30' and 50' dimensions are the existing and future ROW? 2nd request for this item. 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M) This plan as submitted shows only existing SVTs and those are not labeled as to their size. Future SVTs are not depicted at all. Existing SVTs are not clearly identified as existing. 2nd request for this item. 3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 2nd request for this item. 4. The existing curb cuts on Drexel Road at the eastern and western extremities of the Project that are called out as to remain, will be required to be closed. Drexel is a collector roadway as defined in the current MSRP. These driveways WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. See AMG section 5.4.1 2nd request for this item. 5. The proposed Camino Placita Mariposa does not appear to meet the separation requirement of DS 3-01.6.3 from Morris Boulevard. The proposed new street for this Development will either align with Morris Boulevard or be separated by at least 150'. The submitted DSMR to provide relief for this requirement has been rejected by Traffic. 6. Demonstrate how this project meets driveway separation requirements as delineated in Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/16/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Colonia Mariposa 2nd Submittal Tentative Plat Engineering Review LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 6 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-166 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat sheets, Drainage Report, geotechnical report, and title report paperwork were received by Engineering on June 29, 2005. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Some of the comments have not been addressed and there appears to be only one sheet of response letter information in this submittal. For clarification, please provide complete response letter - fax to 879-8010. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.4.2.1: TDOT map center indicates soil type "D" for this site; revise hydrologic data sheets to reflect correct soils type and associated runoff coefficient. Revise design to reflect any changes in basin. 2) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: For basin design address the following: a) On page 3 of the drainage report, check calculations to assure that 5-year coefficients are used to determine correct basin volume calculations. b) Along the proposed cul-de-sac, scuppers and their associated railing usually preclude the use of the sidewalk above the scuppers for access (vehicular and pedestrian). Discuss and/or show how basin area will be accessed. c) Show configuration calculations for basin volume. Show that volume of basin is derived from a basin configuration that includes an access ramp if one is proposed. Show access slope grade. 3) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: Regarding the basin wall design on detail for the basin cross section on sheet 1 of the grading concept, this retaining wall basin design is not acceptable. Provide natural looking design for the basin per DS Sec 10-01.1.1.2, to show that the proposed design provides a detention/retention facility that is multi-use and visually appealing. 4) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: Discuss results of infiltration testing in drainage report to demonstrate how the drain time for the retained stormwater for the proposed basin meets Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria, including maximum disposal time. 5) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a: Describe in the drainage report: a) Proposed permanent erosion control at basin exit. b) Provide storage-volume estimates for routing the 100, and 10-yr events. c) Inlet and outlet routing for weir and spillway: assumptions, equations, and results. d) Provide depth of basin for the design events. 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: On the exhibit, label detention/retention 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevation in basin. 7) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.1: From the topography in the area, stormwater appears to be directed from the Drexel Road / Park Ave intersection westerly along Drexel Road. TSMS node (BR-0311) data shows Q100 =472cfs at intersection of Drexel Road and Park Avenue. Discuss existing flow in Drexel Road. Provide Q100 and show extents on and near the proposed project of any existing floodplain from 100-yr event in Drexel Road. 8) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2: Curb and sidewalk will be required for this project. Discuss in drainage report how the edge of the Rodeo Wash and Airport Wash watersheds will be maintained. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Clarify in the report whether there are any existing wall openings for the existing development to the east onto the subject site. Discuss in report spacing and size of any existing wall openings and how this flow if any affects hydrology for the site. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: On location map, label railroad. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.a: Add as a general note: "All public roads and drainage improvements within and adjacent to this subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.b: Label Camino Colonia Mariposa as a public or private street. Add as a general note: "Total miles of new public streets are ________" or "Total miles of new private streets are _______." 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.3: Provide basin and inlet elevational and dimensional information on Tentative Plat. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Depict and clarify whether any walls will be proposed and if so where any wall openings will be located. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide a typical lot grading detail or show direction of drainage on the lots in a detail or on the Typical Lot Concept detail on sheet 1. Address the following: a) Clarify how distances for minimum setbacks provide appropriate area for drainage swales, mechanical equipment, A/C units, slope setbacks for screen walls, slope run-outs, and general access. b) Assure that the detail complies with any recommendations of soils report. c) Provide in detail the general / typical high point elevation or grade break locations as it relates to the finished pad elevation, as well as minimum flow grades around building pads. 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: The following information regarding the existing public right-of-way will be provided for Drexel Road: label total or half right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving. 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F. Address the following proposed right-of-way improvements: a) Show and label future MS&R right-of-way. b) Provide cross section of Drexel Road labeling proposed curbs and sidewalks along Drexel Road to connect to existing adjacent properties, and conforming to DS Sec.3-10.10.Fig.11 dimensions as well as MS&R requirement of new 6-foot wide sidewalk. 18) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.4.a): Label proposed permanent erosion control at basin exit. 19) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: Show access and/or provide access / maintenance easements to the drainage basin. 20) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: On the Tentative Plat plan view, show detention/retention 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevation in basin. 21) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Show any setback dimensions from basin ponding limits to proposed buildings on plan view. 22) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Address the following survey data: a) Label for basis of bearing on plan view. b) Show tie to permanent survey monuments or to the nearest section or quarter section corner. c) Provide local benchmark with datum location indicated on plan view. 23) DS Sec.10-01.4.3: Show or add note regarding basin security barriers for proposed basin along all sides of basin. 24) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. 25) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Label and enclose with a solid line for the basin to designate as a common area that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association. 26) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01: a) Provide handicap ramps b) Show street monuments in cul-de-sac 27) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.G: Streets designed for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and by refuse collection vehicles. On sheet 1, revise street cross section to conform to DS Sec.3-01.10, to provide sidewalks, a minimum of 20 feet clear unobstructed roadway width, and parking on both sides of the streets. Provide complete response letter. You may call to go over these comments, or if you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/25/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 22, 2005 TO: Steve Corrales Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Placita Mariposa Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S04-166 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested on December 2, 2004, please provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Delete the sewer profile. Add the project number, S04-166, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Add the following General Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. The maximum length of the 8-inch sewer line should be 500 feet. Add the necessary manhole to avoid having over 500 feet of 8-inch sewer. Show the Pima County plan number and the size for the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. A public manhole will be required at the intersection of the proposed private sewer and the existing public sewer. Show this manhole along with its proposed rim and invert elevations. Show the rim and invert elevations for all proposed manholes. Show the slope of the proposed private sewer. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 07/28/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 29, 2005 Larry Potter P.O. Box 57370 Tucsion, AZ 85732 Subject: S04-166 Colonia Mariposa Tentative Plat Dear Larry: Your submittal of June 29, 2005, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (zoning, engineering, traffic, addressing, landscaping, wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (zoning, engineering, landscaping, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO (landscaping, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608. Sincerely, Craig L. Gross CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-1208 |