Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-166
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/20/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 20, 2006 TO: George Holguin Southern Arizona Land Trust, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Colonia Mariposa, Lots 1-18 and Common Areas A, B1-B15, C1 & C2 Tentative Plat – 4th Submittal S04-166 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested on December 2, 2004, on July 22, 2005, and on March 5, 2006, please provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. SHEET 2. Show the size, length and slope of the newly proposed public sewers. SHEET 2. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole number for the existing public manholes shown on this sheet. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 5th submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 07/24/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A masonry screen wall is required for the guest parking area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the tentative plat and landscape plans to provide the required screen wall between the parking area (C.A. B9) and the adjacent residentially zoned property. 2) The Native Plant Preservation Application for Exception is not approved. The landscape plans should document the assertion that protected native plants will not be substantially impacted. Show the location of existing protected native plants and include provisions for preservation such as plan coordination and fencing for plant protection. 3) Revise all landscape plan sheet such that all lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater. DS 2-03.2.1.C 4) Revise the landscape plan to eliminate the conflicts with sight visibility triangles. Cassis nemophylla (M) is to tall. DS 3-01.6.0 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN/IRRIGATION PLAN AND A REVISED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN/APPLICATION IS REQUIRED. |
| 08/17/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S04-166 Placita Mariposa Tentative Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 17, 2006 DUE DATE: August 14, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please remove LUC 2.3.5.2.A.1 from general note 21. That section was provided in the reviewer's comment as the reasoning for adding the "subject to" for R-2 zoning. 2. Due to their configuration, most of the visitor parking spaces will appear to be portions of privately owned lots within the subdivision. The CC&Rs must include provisions for the guest parking within common areas and signage must be placed at the front of these spaces to indicate that these spaces are available for use as visitor parking for the guests of all residents within the subdivision. Show the location of the signage on the plat with a keynote arrow and provide a copy of the CC&Rs for verification. DS 3-05.2.4.A 3. Please add the DSMR case number and conditions for approval on sheet 1. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04-166tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, and CC&R's. |
| 09/25/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Colonia Mariposa 3rd Submittal Tentative Plat Engineering Review LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 6 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-166 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat sheets, revised Drainage Report, landscape documents, and response letter were received by Engineering for review. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat at this time. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.4.2.1: TDOT map center indicates soil type "D" for this site; revise hydrologic data sheets to reflect correct soils type and associated runoff coefficient. Revise design to reflect any changes in basin such that a bleed pipe is provided to reduce ponding problems post construction. 2) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: In the drainage report, check calculations to assure that 5-year coefficients are used to determine correct basin volume calculations. 3) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: Regarding the basin, address the following comments: a) The shotcrete exit proposed for spillway basin outlet, this design limits the amount of energy dissipation for basin outlet. Provide sufficient space for sized spillway with information on energy dissipating material surface. b) Provide natural looking design for the basin per DS Sec 10-01.1.1.2, to show that the proposed design provides a detention/retention facility that is multi-use and visually appealing. The basin should provide adequate elevation for bleed pipe and sufficient space for setbacks and slope runouts. 4) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: Discuss results of infiltration testing in drainage report to demonstrate how the drain time for the retained stormwater for the proposed basin meets Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria, including maximum disposal time not to exceed 12 hours. 5) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.1: The report states that there is no offsite drainage impacting the site however, from the topography in the area, stormwater appears to be directed from the Drexel Road / Park Ave intersection westerly along Drexel Road. TSMS node (BR-0311) data shows Q100 =472cfs at intersection of Drexel Road and Park Avenue. Discuss existing flow in Drexel Road. Provide Q100 and show extents on and near the proposed project of any existing floodplain from 100-yr event in Drexel Road. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Clarify in the report whether there are any existing wall openings for the existing development to the east onto the subject site. Discuss in report spacing and size of any existing wall openings and how this flow if any affects hydrology for the site. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Depict and clarify whether any walls will be proposed and if so where any wall openings will be located. Show 2-3 existing openings on northeast portion of existing wall on adjacent property and how this drainage is addressed; provide drainage easement for interceptor swale or other design consideration. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide a typical lot grading detail or show direction of drainage on the lots in a detail or on the Typical Lot Concept detail on sheet 1. Address the following: a) Clarify how distances for minimum setbacks provide appropriate area for drainage swales, mechanical equipment, A/C units, slope setbacks for screen walls, slope run-outs, and general access. b) Assure that the detail complies with any recommendations of soils report. c) Provide in detail the general / typical high point elevation or grade break locations as it relates to the finished pad elevation, as well as minimum flow grades around building pads. d) The following comment may be addressed at grading plan review stage: Show proposed areas for water harvesting on plan views. Consider careful allocation of areas for waterharvesting that will not cause ponding issues and will be able to drain out of the waterharvest area via notched openings or bleed pipes if necessary. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. 10) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.E: Clarify the two parcels that make up this project site on planview, and submit a copy of the title reports. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01. Show street monuments in cul-de-sac and at intersection of Drexel Road and Drexel Place. Per DS Sec.2-03.2.4.1.a, the sewer layout shall be designed so that manholes will not interfere with street survey monuments. However, survey monuments may be offset from manhole locations if so indicated on the plat. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.G: A DSMR was submitted and approved with conditions. Address conditions of approval including showing the utility easement on sheets. 13) DS Sec.2-03.5.2: A grading permit will be required for this project and an application may be submitted once the basin design has been revised. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A.2: Provide seal for engineer preparing the plat on each sheet. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Clarify legend symbols for electrical pedestal and transformer on planview; assure the planview symbols match the planviews. A meeting to go over comments is required prior to next resubmittal. Provide complete response letter with revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report, copy of title report, and a copy of the geotechnical report at resubmittal. You may call to go over these comments, or to set up the meeting or if you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/26/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 26, 2006 Larry Potter P.O. Box 57370 Tucsion, AZ 85732 Subject: S04-166 Placita Mariposa formerly Colonia Mariposa Tentative Plat Dear Larry: Your submittal of July 17, 2006, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, Wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscaping, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) THIS TENTATIVE PLAT MUST BE APPROVED BY NOVEMBER 8, 2006 IN ORDER TO AVOID NEW REVIEW FEES. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-1208 |