Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S04-152
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
7855 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S04-152
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/05/2004 FRODRIG2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/08/2004 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved November 08, 2004.
11/16/2004 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

RICK LYONS
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: November 16, 2004


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S04-152 Desert Stones T151519 (141-09)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Remove shading.
Add the interior bearings for the lot lines; the dimensions and bearings for street centerlines.
Add the complete curve data.
Sheet 3 – the public drainageway is labeled as Common Area “B”.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.






Susan King
11/18/2004 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S04-152 DESERT STONES/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 11/18/04



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Correct DP 19-24 to 19-94 on Location Map, sheet index map, sheets 4 and 6.

Correct Gray Hawk Ranch, Bk 49, Pg 9 to Grayhawk Ranch (sheet 3).

Correct Gray Hawk Ranch Road to Grayhawk Ranch Road (sheet 3).

Label approved interior street names on Final Plat.
11/19/2004 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S04-152 Desert Stones 11/18/04

(x) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-10

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon/Southeast Subregional Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A

COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/02/04

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(x) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(x) Resubmittal Required:
(x) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(x) Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 11/18/04



Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments
Desert Stones - S04-152 - First Submittal

Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan and Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments.

1. Zoning condition number four states that the 10 feet landscape border along Interstate 10 shall include 24-inch box canopy trees planted 25 feet on center. Please locate the required trees in the required locations.

2. Zoning condition numbers five, six, and 14 relate to screen walls. Please adhere to the zoning conditions. Please show a detail on the appropriate sheet that specifically shows the chosen visually appealing design treatments and graffiti resistant materials. If any of the walls are planned to jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc. please show on the appropriate sheet.

3. Zoning condition seven states that canopy trees shall be planted on each lot. Please locate these canopy trees on the appropriate sheets.

4. Zoning condition 12 states that all pedestrian paths within recreational and open space areas shall connect to the sidewalks in the subdivision. Please provide connectivity and accessibility to the uses within the recreation areas. The recreational uses need to be handicapped accessible.

5. Zoning condition 13 states that all recreation areas shall include passive and active recreational amenities including a variety of uses. Please include and label all the required uses in the recreational areas.

6. Please locate a sidewalk in the pedestrian access area between lots 50 and 51. The sidewalk needs to be built to the same standards as the sidewalks in the subdivision. In addition, to ensure a pedestrian friendly environment please locate canopy trees along the south side of the sidewalk. They should be planted 25 feet on center. Also demonstrate how the 10 feet wide pedestrian access strip complies with ‘safe by design’ concepts.

7. Please show the pedestrian path that is to be built in the El Paso Natural Gas easement. The path needs to connect to the path that is built in the El Paso Natural Gas easement in the Vista Montana Estates subdivision. The path needs to be handicapped accessible.

8. Please show the pedestrian path that connects the two recreational areas.

9. Please connect the sidewalks within the subdivision to the sidewalk along Wilmot Road.

10. City staff has worked with the developers of Vista Montana Estates to allow pedestrian connectivity for the two developments in the area of lots 232 through 238. Please cooperate with developers of Vista Montana Estates to properly align pedestrian access to and from the two respective subdivisions. Please make the pedestrian access areas comply with ‘safe by design’ concepts.
11/23/2004 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Denied A few concerns from ADOT;

- Please identify ADOT R/W and control of access on the plans. We
believe ADOT R/W, on Wilmot, extends south of the existing cattle guard.
- ADOT will need a copy of the TIA to see the extent of the
improvements needed at the Wilmot T.I.
- The new traffic generated by the development will affect the
operation of the T.I., which the developer is to mitigate.
- It will be the responsibility of the developer to install any type
of noise mitigation along the subdivision boundary with I-10, which is
recommended by ADOT.
- ADOT will require a drainage report for review and approval.
- Any work in ADOT right of way, including removal and replacement
of existing fence, will require an ADOT encroachment permit.

If you have any questions you can contact Dan Williams, 620-5427, or
myself at 620-5435 . Thank You. TM.
11/30/2004 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: DESERT STONES
Lots 1-261
S04-152


Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated
October 27, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time.
There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the
development. The facilities along I-10 must be shown on the plat prior to
approval.

A copy of TEP'S facility map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities is enclosed.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative
Plat within thirty (30) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional
plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including
water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have
any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745.

Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tep.com
Office: (520) 917-8745
Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668
Fax: (520) 917-8700
11/30/2004 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Transportation Information for Rezoning,
Subdivision and Development Review Requests
File Number Description Date Reviewed
E
Pima Association of Governments
Transportation Planning Division
177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405
Tucson, AZ 85701
Phone: (520) 792-1093
Fax: (520) 792-9151
www.pagnet.org
S04-152 Desert Stones 11/29/2004
1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street
2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Planned Action:
STREET IDENTIFICATION
3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic
4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E”
5. Existing Number of Lanes
9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development
(Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips)
8. Future Number of Lanes
TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS
10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance)
11. Existing or Planned Bikeway
Remarks:
Street Number 1 Street Number 2
Year Year
Planned Action:
VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS
6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed
7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E”
Wilmot (south of I-10)
No 0
500
24,500
2
24,500
49,332
2
2,498
None
None
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12/02/2004 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, 12/02/2004,

SUBJECT: Desert Stones
S04-152, T15S, R15E, SECTION 19

RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on November 05, 2004

The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments:

Drainage Report:

1. Fig. #2 does not show the locations of the offsite runoff watersheds and their concentration points (OS1 and OS2).
2. Show concentration point OS on the drainage exhibits.
3. OS1 and OS hydrologic data sheets are included in the developed condition section. It seems that they should be in the existing condition section. Additionally, OS2 hydrologic data sheet was not included.
4. Show all existing contributing watershed on Fig. 2.
5. Show existing conditions offsite and onsite runoffs on Fig. 2.
6. Fig. 2 does not depict the off site channel as stated in section 3.5 on sheet 4.
7. Although the subject project is not designated as a riparian habitat area, the Old Rodeo Wash is designated as a proposed ERZ Wash, which should be protected within the 100-year floodplain limits. Since the drainage scheme is proposing an extensive encroachment on the existing 100-year floodplain area, proper mitigation should be provided. Address this issue in the Drainage Report and work with the Zoning Division to determine an acceptable mitigation plan.
8. Reference the equation used to size the sidewalk scuppers (i.e. what chapter of the SMDDFM). Additionally, the equation includes Cf and Cs as parameters, but in the parameter definitions, Cd is defined. Explain and revise as necessary.
9. It is not clear how the Old Rodeo Wash runoff will be transitioned from the flared channel section in Vista Montana to the proposed 26-foot bottom trapezoidal channel in Desert Stones. Clarify the transition in the text, the calculations and graphically on the drainage exhibit.
10. Define the abbreviations VM, VMMF and VMEF on the Figure 3.
11. Provide a graphical representation for all the proposed channel cross sections.
12. Clarify where the channel cross sections with bottom widths of 45 and 90 feet were taken.
13. It is not clear from the Roadway Calculations how deep the water will be. This information is necessary to determine if the water tops over the wedge curb for both normal crown and superelevation scenarios. Include graphical representation of the proposed street cross section hydraulic ratings.
14. Clarify the source of the parameters used to analyze the Wilmot Road Culvert. Additionally, Considering the width of the existing Wilmot Road dip section, the proposed box culvert represents a severe constriction of the Old Rodeo Wash runoff, which causes an increase in the runoff energy and velocity. The submitted box culvert analysis shows very erosive velocity (10.87 fps), which is not acceptable. Revise the culvert design to reduce the outlet velocity and provide energy dissipating structures within Wilmot Road right of way to return the Old Rodeo Wash runoff velocity to pre-development conditions and to protect the Wash's resources downstream of the box culvert.
15. It appears that the proposed channel downstream of the proposed box culvert will be within the "Wilmot & I-10 Commercial Center" property, which was approved for development under Rezoning Case number C9-01-05 and Subdivision Plat Case number S01-040. The Rezoning Case required, under Rezoning Condition # 12, "Sufficient width of land area be preserved and set aside as natural open space along the south property line for the resource area of the Rodeo Wash". The said area shall remain open and natural as required by Rezoning Condition #12 and shall not be permitted to be utilized by this project to install a channel.
16. It is not clear on the drainage exhibit or on the Tentative Plat which storm sewer system is 1 or 2. Additionally, show on the drainage exhibit and the Tentative Plat the pipe numbers and the elevations at pipe and manhole inverts to facilitate the review.
17. Clarify on drainage exhibit and the Tentative Plat the numbers of the proposed curb inlets.
18. It appears on the drainage exhibit that the storm drains outletting into Basin 1 either extend beyond the proposed splash pad or the splash pad is not shown at all. Revise.
19. The proposed Basin 1 bleed pipe is very long, which may create a maintenance difficulty for the Homeowners association. This Office recommends using a larger pipe and controlling the discharge at the inlet of the pipe (installing a smaller orifice at the pipe inlet).
20. All proposed detention/retention basins shall include maintenance ramps.
21. Address sediment traps or other sediment control measures in all the proposed detention/retention basins to demonstrate compliance with Section 3.4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual.
22. Address drainage facilities maintenance responsibility and provide a maintenance checklist. We also recommend including a copy of the check list in the CC & R's to allow the Home Owners Association access to the list and facilitate their maintenance responsibility.
23. Determine in the Drainage Report, based on scour depth calculations, the depth of the cut off walls shown in details on sheet 6 of the Tentative Plat.
24. Address water harvesting.

Tentative Plat:

1. Provide the correct S04-______ subdivision case number according to D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1.
2. Include in General Note #1 the proposed zoning as required by D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1.
3. Add a general note stating that a floodplain use permit is required for this project in accordance with D.S. 2-03.2.2.C.2. Include in the note the purpose of the floodplain use permit (constructing drainage structures within the Old Rodeo Wash 100-year floodplain). Please be advised that the mitigation requirements will be addressed in the floodplain use permit conditions.
4. Benchmark locations, the proposed location of and method of tie to permanent survey monuments or to the nearest section or quarter section corner and the proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments will be shown. All monuments found or set will be described (D.S. 2-03.2.3.A.).
5. Provide the required written documentation from El Paso Natural Gas to verify compliance with Rezoning Condition #11.
6. It appears that not all existing easements included in the Title Report are shown on the Tentative Plat. Additionally, it is not clear to whom the El Paso Natural Gas Easement belongs. Verify this information and revise as needed.
7. The drainage area south of lots 241-245 is shown as Public Drainageway on sheet 1 of 8, but it is shown as a common area on sheet 6 of 8. Revise the discrepancy.
8. It is not clear what the 100-year floodplain line shown on sheet 3 of 8 represents.
9. Clarify how the proposed Old Rodeo Wash Cannel Access Easement will be accessed.
10. Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, will be indicated as required by D.S. 2-03.2.3.J and D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.6. Contained floodplains can be indicated by a note.
11. Indicate locations and types of drainage structures (i.e. curb inlets and their details, etc.) (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.3.).
12. Indicate on the Tentative Plat which lots are Type "A" or Type "B".
13. All proposed interior street cross sections should conform to the requirements of D.S. 3-01.0. (Refer to Figures 2 and 5 for additional information especially the required sidewalk width of 5 feet).
14. Show the detention/retention basins 100-year ponding limits D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.1.
15. Verification is required when any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.5.).
16. Add the entire detention/retention basins dimensions.
17. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.7.).
18. All proposed work in the public right of way requires excavation permits from The Permits and Codes Section of the Transportation Department. Additionally, check with Permits and Codes if a PIA is required for the major work proposed in the public right of way.
19. Set back lines from the proposed detention/retention basins should be determined by the Geotechnical Report and shown on the Tentative Plat (D.S. 2-03.2.4.M.
20. Submit a Geotechnical Report that addresses drainage setback lines and slope protection. Demonstrate compliance with the Geotechnical Report on the Tentative Plat.
21. Cross section B/8 does not appear to match the typical 150' right of way street cross section (Fig 9 of D.S. 3-01.0 shows a 53' pavement and a 20' median). Revise the Wilmot Road cross section to comply with D.S. 3-01.0 and to demonstrate compliance with Rezoning Condition #2.
22. Demonstrate compliance with Rezoning Condition #12.
23. Add a general note, which states that the depicted "existing 100-year floodplain", which impact the areas where lots are proposed, shall be removed or contained within the proposed drainage facilities once they are constructed and completed. Additionally, add a note that requires the Developer to acquire a Floodplain Use Permit, with the Grading Plan, for any proposed work in the said 100-year floodplain, which would result in the floodplain containment. The purpose of this comment is clarify on the plat that floodplain use permits will not be required for the impacted individual lots when they come in for permitting.
24. Add to the existing 100-year floodplain description in the Legend the following: "to be removed with the completion of the proposed drainage facilities".
25. Show sediment traps or other sediment control measures in all the proposed detention/retention basins to demonstrate compliance with Section 3.4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual.
26. Show low-flow channels in all the proposed detention/retention basins in order to provide positive drainage and prevent nuisance ponding in the basins.
27. Revise the Tentative Plat in accordance with the drainage report revisions.

Landscape Plan:

1. Demonstrate compliance with the water-harvesting requirement.

Please be advised that due to the size and complexity of this project, additional comments may be offered on the next submittal.

Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report, on the Tentative Plat and on the Landscape Plan where the revisions were made.


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report
12/08/2004 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection
12/09/2004 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied November 22, 2004

TO: Pattie Davis
MMLA

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Desert Stones, Lots 1-261 and Common Area A
Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal
S04-152

The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

1. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter.

2. Based on the evaluation of the site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

3. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-152, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

4. SHEETS 2-7. For identification purposes, please assign a manhole number to all proposed manholes.

5. SHEET 2. Extend the proposed manhole next to lot 217 so that the HCS may connect via direct tap to the proposed 8-inch sewer line. Per Pima County design standards, connections to manholes shall be avoided when ever possible.

6. SHEET 2 & 3. Show the manhole number for the existing public manhole at the intersection of Wilmot Road and Diablo Sunrise Road.

7. SHEET 3. Extend the manholes next to lots 113 and 130 so that lots 114 and 129 can connect via a direct tap to the proposed 8-inch sewer line.

8. SHEET 4. Extend the manhole next to lot 85 so that lots 86 and 87 can connect via a direct tap to the proposed 8-inch sewer line.

9. SHEET 5. Clearly show from where to where the existing public sewer will be abandoned.

10. SHEET 5. Show the 18-inch public sewer line G-2003-095 which runs through lots 218-231 along with any recorded public sewer easements and corresponding recording information.

11. SHEET 5. The S7 stretch of proposed 12-inch sewer line must lie within a 25-foot public sewer easement "BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT". Additionally a treated drivable surface, and a turn around area with a 55' outside radius will be required so that Pima County Wastewater Management Department's maintenance vehicles can access the proposed manhole. Use PC/COT Standard Details WWM 109, WWM 110 and WWM 111 for assistance and show a detailed cross section showing the public sewer easement.

12. SHEET 6. The proposed public sewer easement between lots 245 and 246 is unacceptable as shown. Pima County Wastewater Management Department's maintenance vehicle require access at all times, however the sharing the easement with a drainageway would not allow for access during a storm event. Please revise this area of your sewer design using the standard details mentioned in item 10 as guidelines.

13. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $250.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947
12/10/2004 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 4, 2005.

2. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-152. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1)

3. Revise general note one (1) as follows: "Existing zoning is SH and C-2. Proposed zoning is R-2." (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2 and .3)

4. Add the following general note: "This plat is designed to meet the Residential Cluster Project (RCP) overlay zone criteria and Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) setback zone." (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.10)

5. All zoning classifications, adjacent to the project, shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly delineated. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.D)

6. Per D.S. 3-01.2.4.D, local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision. Please delineate the on-street parking lanes on all applicable street cross-sections. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.G)

7. Per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A, all new subdivisions shall provide a five (5) foot wide sidewalk along the entire length of street frontage. Revise street cross sections and typical lot details as required.

8. Label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.C)

9. Under the maximum permitted height listed on sheet 1 of 8, a statement is added which limits the development to single-story homes per annexation condition. Please provide a copy of the annexation condition to verify if this statement is correct.

10. On sheet 1 of 8, revise the setback required adjacent to C-1 zone from "20" feet to "height".

11. The typical lot details provided on sheet 7 of 8 show five (5) foot interior lot line building setbacks. The RCP allows for a minimum three (3) foot setback along interior lot lines for detached dwellings. It is suggested that the minimum three (3) foot setback be delineated and you may also add a note which states that all lots will be proposed with a five (5) foot setback if that is the intention.

12. On the typical lot details, a 20 foot setback is proposed to the "garage" or "building". Please clarify. Street setback for buildings and garages shall conform to LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.1 and B.2.

13. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. (D.S. 2-10.3.2.E) (L.U.C. 3.6.1.5)


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
12/11/2004 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: December 10, 2004

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-152 Desert Stones: Tentative Plat Review

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has no comments.



Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
12/13/2004 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Clarify which genus and species of grass is proposed for use in the recreation areas. DS 2-07.2.2

2) Revise the landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with conditions of rezoning case C9-04-10. Show all required landscaping and wall designs.

3) Submit a native plant preservation plan for any off-site work indicated on the tentative plat submittal, such as downstream improvements to the Rodeo Wash. LUC 3.8.3.1

4) Submit an Environmental Resource Report and a Mitigation plan. DS 2-15.2.0

5) Per TCC 26-8(a)(3) "Where natural washes cannot be maintained, a mitigation plan shall be established with emphasis being placed on earthen or naturally appearing channels with landscaping and texture/color added to bank protection materials. The design of earthen channels will be encouraged in order to allow for a more permeable surface which permits reintroduction of the water into the groundwater system, allowing for the reintroduction of native plant species which promotes a natural, partially soil-stabilized system". Revise the plans to mitigate areas where natural washes will not be maintained.

Submittal of all plans is required.
12/13/2004 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
12/13/2004 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP:

1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.”

2. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing locations of no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 figure 21)

3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs on Wilmot. (DS 2-03.2.4.M)

4. Show and label both existing and future ROW on Wilmot. (DS 2-03.2.3.D)

5. Delineate where the travel lanes, turn lanes and parking lanes are and their dimensions in the typical sections on sheets 7 and 8.

6. Clearly delineate how the typical sections proposed for Wilmot Road meet rezoning condition #2. Perhaps provide a separate plan view depiction of meeting this requirement.

7. General note 15 lists the design speed as 25mph. The design speed is required to be 5mph> posted speed. 25mph is the typical posted speed for residential streets.

8. This Development will require a category II TIA in accordance with the AMG.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
12/14/2004 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * No known landfill w/in 1000' of this development.
* Curbside service is approved. APC's to be placed and removed from collection area on the day of service.
12/15/2004 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed