Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-148
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/29/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The plan is approved October 29, 2004. |
| 11/01/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-148 DELPH ENGINEERING INC BONILLAS PARKWAY |
| 11/02/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/03/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-148 BONILLAS PARKWAY/MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: November 3, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include all resubdivision information on all Title Blocks. Change Campbell Rd. to Avenue on Site Location Map. Change Los Ranitos Number 6 to Los Ranchitos Number 6 on pg. 1. jg |
| 11/09/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | BONILLAS PARKWAY - ESTIMATED DAILY TRAFFIC - 48 VEHICLE TRIPS IN 24 HOURS |
| 11/15/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 15, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-148 Bonillas Parkway: Minor Subdivision Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 |
| 11/16/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: November 16, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S04-148 Bonillas Parkway T151407 (140-25) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Per phone conference with Mr. Kent Delph, the following items will be added or corrected before recordation of the plat. The spelling of Ranchitos will be corrected on the northern boundary; the book and page of Los Ranchitos Number 6 will be added to the east, west and south. Tract A and B will be changed to Common Area “A” and “B”, and will be added to the title block. The perimeter lines that are also right-of-way lines will be made solid. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 11/17/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | November 16, 2004 TO: Kent Delph, P.E. Delph Engineering, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Bonillas Parkway at Alvord Road & Park Avenue Final Plat – 1st Submittal S04-148 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of the site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, S04-148, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the final plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 11/19/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse service will be curbside in front of the residence. * APC's to be placed and removed from curbside collection area on the day of collection. * APC's require a screened designated storage area from public R/W and adjacent residence. |
| 11/23/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: BONILLAS PARKWAY Lots 1-5 S04-148 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the final plat for this Minor Subdivision. TEP is unable to approve the plat at this time. Enclosed is the preliminary electrical design for the subject project. Please review this design and contact this office by December 10, 2004 with any conflicts or desired changes. Your written approval of this design is necessary for a final construction drawing. Any changes requested after we have received your written approval will be billable. In order for TEP to approve the plat, the following easements will be required: * A 10' x 10' easement is required at the junction cabinet and transformer locations. * A 10' wide strip easement is required for the underground cable. * A 6' x 6' easement is required at each of the pedestal locations. * Change the dedication to read as: ........EASEMENTS ARE GRANTED TO THE PUBLIC AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE ACCESS, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS OF ABOVEGROUND............(see the attached copy of dedication). A copy of the preliminary design has been forwarded to Southwest Gas. Please insure utility coordination by providing a copy of this preliminary design to Qwest and the Cable Company. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 11/23/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-148 Bonillas Parkway 11/23/04 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Final Plat, Landscape Plan & Utility Plan CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/23/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D.Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 11/19/04 |
| 11/23/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this submittal: 1. The reference cited in general note 11 on the Final Plat refers to an outdated edition. It should be the 2003 edition. 2. All section bubbles on the Utility plan refer to a page 3. The utility plan is only one sheet. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/26/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross, CDRC SUBJECT: Bonillas Parkway REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 26 November 2004 CDRC Case #: S04-148 T15S, R14E, Sec. 7 Resubmittals Required: Revised Final Plat, Landscape Plan, Grading Plan and Drainage Report; a soils report with infiltration test results, and a complete Subdivision Assurance package. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Final Plat, Landscape Plan, Grading Plan and Drainage Report. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The Plat must demonstrate compliance with Final Plat content Development Standards, Floodplain Development regulations and the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes Plan requirements, at a minimum. A revised Drainage Report with soils report and infiltration test results, Tentative Plat, and Landscape Plan addressing the comments below must be resubmitted. The following comments are offered: FINAL PLAT: 1. Include a 2" margin on the left side and ½" margins on the remaining sides to comply with standardization requirements of state law for recorded plats (Development Standard - DS - 2-03.6.1 B). 2. Place the words "Book ____ Page ____" in the upper right (side) outside the margin line, in addition to the one provided on the lower right (bottom). The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation (DS 2-03.6.1 G). 3. Include reference to Common Area(s) in the Title Block. Assure each common area is specifically described (Retention/Detention basin, Open Space, Private Street, etc.), with individual letter designations for each common area. All references to the subdivision in the subdivision assurance package much match the Title Block identically (DS 2-03.6.1.H 1 and DS 2-03.6.4 C). 4. Include in the legend a symbol with description for all lines and symbols used on the Plat (such as easement lines, roadway centerlines, section lines, property/right of way lines, floodplain delineations, etc.) (DS 2-03.6.1 L). 5. Revise General Note # 3 to reflect the new private street mileage. The note should read as shown in Development Standard 2-03.6.2 C. 6. Please include the note provided for relocation, modification of existing utilities (DS 2-03.6.2 I). 7. Provide a Beneficiary Block and signature line(s) if applicable. It appears that a signature line is provided for such under the first "Acknowledgement" paragraph heading (DS 2-03.6.3 C). 8. Insert the word "Department" between the word "Services" and "Director" in the appropriate Assurance paragraph signature line, and replace the word "Engineer" with the words "Development Services Dept. Engineering Division Administrator" (DS 2-03.6.3). 9. Dimension and label Park Avenue "future" right of way to be dedicated by this plat, in accordance with the City's Major Streets and Routes Plan (DS 2-03.6.4 A & DS 2-03.2.4 H). 10. Provide location, dimensions, areas in square footage, and purposes of lots or areas to be dedicated (DS 2-03.6.4 D). 11. Show any 100- year floodprone limits if applicable, in a surveyable, retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of 100-cfs or more (DS 2-03.6.4 F). 12. Show no vehicular access easements where applicable (DS 2-03.6.4 H). 13. Indicate primary control points on the plat, or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which all dimensions, angles, bearings, and similar data on the plat will be referred. Where a coordinate system has been established by the City Engineer or County Engineer, primary control points may be referenced thereto. The plat must include a description of the corner marker and an indication of how the bearings were determined. Corner tie recordation information is to be provided on the plat (DS 2-03.6.5 A). 14. Please check all tract boundary lines; right-of-way widths and centerlines of streets, easements, and future rights-of-way; and property lines of residential lots and other sites, with accurate dimensions, bearings, or deflection angles and radii, arcs, and central angles of all curves (DS 2-03.6.5 B). 15. Provide boundary survey closure calculations (DS 2-03.6.5). 16. Please refer to Development Standard 2-03.6.5 C and assure all items are fully addressed and depicted/described on the Plat. 17. Assure a note is provided on the plat that a ½" iron rod will be set at all corners upon completion of construction (DS 2-03.6.5 C 4 b). 18. Re-check to proposed lot corner pins depicted, and provide a symbol with description in the legend. (DS 2-03.6.5 C 4) 19. The consultant may wish to correct the spelling of the word curb in General Note # 7. Development Standard 2-03.9.0 (Minor Subdivision Plat) states that, "although a tentative (plat) is not required, engineering information is needed to review the project for compliance with regulations and good engineering practices. The comments listed below represent such items needed for this project to assure compliance with existing standards, policies and regulations. Subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of plat and plan revisions. 20. Include in the Title Block a statement as to whether this project is a resubdivision of an earlier subdivision (DS 2-03.2.1 G 3). 21. Provide the following note on the plat: "All public roads and drainage improvements within and adjacent to this subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City of Tucson Engineer's Office for review and approval" (DS 2-03.2.2 D 1 (a)). 22. Provide the method of tie to the permanent survey monuments or nearest section or quarter section corner, and the proposed location and type of subdivision control monumentation. All monuments found or set shall be described (DS 2-03.2.3 A). CONCEPT GRADING PLAN: The grading plan comments provided below do not necessarily address all grading plan review comments. Subsequent comments may be necessary during the normal grading plan/permit application and review process. 23. The City of Tucson's Land Use Code (LUC), Section 4.2.2 requires that all streets bounding the proposed subdivision are fully improved, except for sidewalks which may be improved as a part of the project (LUC Sec. 4.2.2.1 F). Clearly label new curb and sidewalk to be constructed along Alvord Road (see also Street Development Standards 3-01.0 for public street paving, curbing, and sidewalk location and construction requirements). Revise the grading plan accordingly. 24. Provide a note that site grading shall be in conformance with Development Standard 11-01.0. 25. Provide right of way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalk for all adjacent rights of way, labeled as existing or proposed (DS 2-03.2.3 D). 26. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum with City Field Book and Page numbers (DS 2-03.2.3 F). 27. Depict and label any floodplain information, including the location of 100-year flood limits for all flows of 100-cfs with water surface elevations provided (DS 2-03.2.3 J {1-3}). 28. Provide typical cross-sections for each perimeter, fully labeled and dimensioned with elevations provided. Include retention/detention basin dimensions/details, and include 2' minimum grading setbacks from all property lines. DRAINAGE REPORT: Pleases address the following comments in a response letter and a revised drainage report: 29. Calculation of the 5-year threshold retention volume requirement shall be in accordance with Equation 3.3 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0). 30. Specify the name, address, and telephone numbers of the persons firms agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and liability of drainage improvements in accordance with the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management -DS 10-02.0 - Section 2.3.1.2 E. 31. Describe the size, location and hydrologic characteristics of upstream and adjoining watersheds which may potentially affect the site (DS 10-02.2.3.1.3 A 2). 32. Provide either a topographic map at a scale of one inch equal to 200 feet or larger preferably, or a photo-topo which shows all of the items outlined in sub-sections a-d of Section 2.3.1.3 A 3 (DS 10-02.0). 33. Include details in the report (on Exhibit 3 is acceptable) for the retention/detention basin outlet weir, out-fall channel, and a basin maintenance access ramp - fully labeled and dimensioned. Include the security barrier in the outlet weir detail (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6 A 4 {a and b}). 34. Address all items outlined in Sections 1.5.2 and 2.3.1.6 C (1-2). The report must include a detailed inspection checklist and schedule, retention/detention basin performance criteria, and include the language provided in sub-section 2 (DS 10-02.0). 35. Provide certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to applicable Local, State, and Federal Floodplain Regulations, in accordance with Section 2.3.1.7 (DS 10-02.0). 36. Include a soils report with a resubmittal, containing the items listed in Section 14.2.6 - including 30' deep soil boring results. Provide discussion and analysis in the report demonstrating the basin will drain within the allowed time frame (DS 10-01.3.5.1 {3 & 5} and DS 10-02.14). 37. The report must address Embankment/Emergency spillway requirements, as discussed in Section 3.3.4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0). LANDSCAPE PLAN: Any changes to the plat that pertain to the Landscape Plan must be reflected on a revised Landscape plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. A grading permit will be required for this project development. Grading shall be in conformance with all soils and geotechnical report recommendations, and Development Standard 11-01.0 - Excavation and Grading, at a minimum. 2. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with the grading plan/permit submittal. For further information, visit: http://www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html 3. The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the assurances are approved by the City Engineer's Office (DS 2-03.7.1G & 2-03.9.3 E). All sections of the assurance documentation must match word-for-word for the descriptions of the common areas listed on the Final Plat. Please assure all documents verbiage for the subdivision description matches the Final Plat. For example, the letter and use for each common area description shall match the Plat Title Block descriptions and letters. This must be correct in order to prevent delay of the assurance review in the City of Tucson's legal offices. Resubmittal will require: Revised Final Plat and Landscape Plan, a revised Drainage Report, a Soils Report with basin infiltration test results, two (2) complete subdivision assurance packages (including a copy of sample CC&R's, a current Title Report, sample warranty deed, a copy of the original Trust agreement, an original copy of the amendment to Trust, and Agreement to Construct Subdivision Improvements, and all associated exhibits at a minimum), a revised grading plan and boundary survey closure calculations, addressing all comments provided above. Please note that additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 11/26/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: Bonillas Parkway S04-148 Final Plat TRANSMITTAL: November 26, 2004 DUE DATE: November 26, 2004 1. Please place the S04-148 case number near the title block in the lower right corner of all sheets of the plat. DS 2-03.6.1.K 2. Specify the square footages of each lot and common area on the final plat drawing sheet 1/1. Enclose common areas with solid lines rather that dashed line. Also, the north property line for lot one must be solid. DS 2-03.6.4.B & C 3. Add a beneficiary block to the plat sheet 1 of 1. DS 2-03.6.3.C 4. In the title block on sheet 1 of 1, indicate that this plat is a resubdivision of Los Ranchitos and list the common areas A & B. DS 2-03.6.1.H.3 5. Place the words "Book ____ and Page ____" in both the upper and lower right corners of the plat outside the margin line on sheet 1 of 1. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorders Office at time of recordation. DS 2-03.6.1.G 6. Reference recorded subdivisions by book and page numbers within the area shown in the site location map. DS2-03.6.1.D.2 7. Remove general note 3 from the final plat sheet 1/1 as this refers to an unrelated rezoning on Pantano Road. The subject property is not subject to a rezoning. DS 2-03.6.2. D 8. Revise parking note 2 as a DSMR cannot eliminate required parking. The process for that is a Board of Adjustment Variance. Per DS 3-01.2.4.D local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one space per dwelling unit. Per DS 3-05.2.4.A, on-site tandem parking spaces on individual residential lots do not count towards visitor parking requirements, since visitor parking is to be accessible to all residents of the project. If a DSMR is sought it will be to allow the tandem spaces to count as the required visitor parking spaces. Revise parking note 2 and if the DSMR is approved, add the DSMR case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions imposed on site plan sheet 2 of 4. DS 3-01.2.4.D DS 3-05.2.4.A DS 2-02.2.1.A.38 9. Five parking spaces are labeled in the 20-foot wide street area on sheet 2 of 4. This street is not wide enough to allow on street parking. Revise drawing. DS 3-01 10. Revise the zoning immediately to the east of the site to read "O-3" on sheet 2 of 4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 11. Label future curb location, add future sidewalks and label all dimensions from street monument lines of existing and future ½ right-of-way, existing and future curbs and sidewalks on sheet 2 of 4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 & 21 12. Correct "Campbell Road" to read "Campbell Avenue" in the location map on plat sheet 1/1. 13. If the small circle dots along the east line of the subdivision on sheet 1 of 1 are property line intersections (pin locations) they are not located correctly. Revise or clarify and add other lot corner markers if applicable. 14. Add the total miles of new private streets to the general notes DS 2-03.6.2.C 15. Add future sight visibility triangles (based on MS&R future curb location) at the entrance drives to Park Avenue. DS 3-01.5.1 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 11/29/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise all plans to meet the basin slope/depth requirements of DS 10-01.09, p. 78. Basins with depths greater than three feet are limited to 4:1 side slopes. 2) Revise the landscape plan to provide a minimum of 35% vegetative coverage for the retention basin. DS 10-01.4, p.89. 3) Revise the landscape and site plans to show the future sight visibility triangles and adjust planting plan as necessary. Plants, such as shrubs, that typically exceed 30" in height should be excluded from the sight visibility triangles. DS 2-06.3.7.B.1 |
| 12/01/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please clarify the 10' showing adjacent to Park Avenue. Is this existing right of way or right of way to be dedicated per the plat? |
| 12/08/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/08/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |