Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-120
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/15/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-120 DESERT SHADOWS / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: MARCH 15, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Add Place or Court to Desert Stone. |
| 03/15/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-120 DESERT SHADOWS / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: MARCH 28, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Approve on condition that Place or Court is added to Desert Stone on Final Plat ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 03/19/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/25/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) [Previous comment, unresolved] "Show any plantings required by the Department of Planning and Urban Design for the streetscape on the landscape plan. We strongly encourage the use of native tree species to compensate for the loss of native plants on the site. Aerial photos of the site from 2002 clearly indicate the presence of many trees. No native plant preservation plan has been approved." A plan is required prior to approval. 2) Revise the planting plan to include 50% vegetative coverage of the street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 Additional plantings may be required. Provide calculations per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.g. 3) Identify the location of the refuse storage area and any required screening. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 4) [Previous comment, unresolved] "All landscaping and screening must comply with the sight visibility requirements of Development Standard 3-01.0. Plant materials located within sight visibility triangles should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty (30) inches. Alternately, plants taller than thirty inches may be located outside of the SVT. Revise the plan to locate the Caesalpinia pulcherrima shown east of the entrance behind the SVT." 5) [Previous comment, unresolved] "The native plant application for exception is not yet approved. The photos received do not clearly indicate that no protected plants exist on the site. Provide additional close-up photos of any trees on the perimeter of the site or in the adjacent public right-of-way areas." 6) Decomposed granite is also required in the adjacent right-of-way area per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. Revise to clarify. 7) Revise general note 6 on the tentative plat to exclude refuse collection from the designation for Common Area A. Resubmittal of the tentative plat is required. In addition, submittal of landscape and native plant preservation plans is required. |
| 03/25/2005 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 25, 2005 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Desert Shadows Tentative Plat. The activity number is S04-120. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on March 10th, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items recommends approval of the Tentative Plat and the Drainage Report. CONDITIONALLY APPROVED: TENTATIVE PLAT AND DRAINAGE REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standard 11-01. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in DS 11-01.8. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert, 791-5550 for submittal requirements. 8. All proposed easements must be shown in a surveyable manner on the Final Plat. The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. For plat clarity include in a general notes that each home will have individual solid waste pick up. 2. Remove the verbiage, " And Refuse Collection Area," from the title block. 3. Include in a general note the DSMR the case number and a general note describing what the DSMR was for and any conditions that apply on the plat |
| 03/25/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-120 Desert Shadows 03/25/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/24/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other - Elevations REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 03/24/05 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Desert Shadows – S04-120 Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the Grant Alvernon Area Plan, the General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. When RCP site areas are less than four acres in size, the single-family structures need to be architecturally compatible with single-family structures on adjacent parcels. Please show an elevation of the architectural style(s) in the proposed development. |
| 03/25/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-120 Desert Shadows 05/27/05 (XXXX) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other (Grading Plan) CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: n/a SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions (XXXX) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( )) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: D.Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 5/27/05 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Desert Shadows - S04-120 The applicant has submitted photos and elevations to illustrate compatibility with adjacent parcels. Also, the applicant will be adding a general note #30 to the tentative plat stating that architectural treatment such as (pop outs, etc.) will be employed on units 1 and 12 fronting on Presidio Road. The Department of Urban Planning and Design staff requests that DSD staff confirm the changes on the mylar. |
| 03/28/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 8, 2005 Paul Nzomo Coronado Engineering 1010 North Finance Center Drive #200 Tucson, AZ 85710 Subject: S04-120 Desert Shadows Tentative Plat Dear Paul: The above referenced plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee, subject to the revisions required on the mylars. Please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Reproducible Oce or Photo Mylar copy of the Plat, landscape plan and NPPO. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 571-1961 |