Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-119
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/02/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved Sept. 9, 2004. |
| 09/02/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | 1) Real Estate has an open RES 2005-021 for the vacation and conveyance of the rights of way and can not approve of the plat until the transaction is ready to go before Mayor and Council for approval. A general note on the final plat must read: " The Rights of Way shown herein as Vacated were vacated by Mayor and Council adoption of Ordinance #_____on __day of ___2004, and recorded in Docket ___, Page___." Please notify Real Estate one month in advance before the plat is to be scheduled for Mayor and Council approval. When the RES process is complete Real Estate will have the vacation of the Rights of Way agendized for Mayor and Council's adoption simultaneous with the agenda of the final plat. 2) Purchase of the well site from the City of Tucson located on the Southeast corner of said plat must be complete before final approval of Plat. Please contact Real Estate to begin the acquisition process. |
| 09/07/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this developmend. * Refuse collection to be individual 90 gallon APC's. Containers to be placed and removed from the curb side collection area on the day of service. Storage area on site is required for the containers. |
| 09/09/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-119 SAVAGE ADDITION AMENDED/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 9/03/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Shade in only the project area on Location Plan. Change 18/74 to 42/26 and 26/50 to 26/5 on Location Plan. Add Township and Range to all Title Blocks. |
| 09/16/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to include street landscape borders along Igo Way and Rosewood Street. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2) Revise the plans to provide common areas for required street landscape borders. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.c 3) Revise the basin to conform to DS 10-01.0, p. 78 such that continuous uniform slopes do not exceed 20 percent of the basin perimeter. LUC 3.7.4.3.A RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 09/21/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 20, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-119 Savage Addition Amended: TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/21/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-119 Savage Addition Amended 09/20/04 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-74-68 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: September 28, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 9/15/2004 |
| 09/24/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 23, 2004 TO: Antony C. Tsang, A. C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Savage Addition Amended, Lots 1-13 and Common Area A - Submittal S04-119 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the historical evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-119, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Add project reference number C12-64-13 to the title block. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 11 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. SHEET 1. Delete General Note 12. SHEET 1. Revise the legend so that it shows the following Proposed sewer line symbol Proposed manhole symbol (currently shown) Existing sewer line symbol (currently shown) Existing manhole symbol (currently shown) The “Existing Sewer Flow Direction” symbol may be deleted, though the arrows may be left on the layout. SHEET 1. The layout of the existing sewers requires revision. The layout shown is not accurate. Please label the existing public sewer lines with their respective Pima County plan number and their size. Additionally, please revise the layout of the public sewer line along N Igo Way as it does not match the existing layout shown in our records. SHEET 1. The drainage crossing the 8-inch proposed sewer line must provide a minimum of 2 feet of clearance. Please provide the invert elevation of the drainage at the intersection location. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 09/24/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-119 Savage Addition Amended T141510 (133-33) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the square footages for the lots and the common area. Add the bearings for the lots and the dimension and bearing for the street centerline. Add road information for Harrison Road and Rosewood Street. Add the name and Map and Plat of the subdivision to the north of Rosewood Street. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 09/28/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: September 28, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 9100 E. Rosewood St., Savage Addition Amended Subdivision Plat S04-119 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 10 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 4. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 6. It is assumed that the developer has or will acquire the COT owned parcels at the SE corner of the property. 7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 8. Please add note "All earthwork and excavation shall be in accordance with D.S. 11-01". 9. Complete Subdivision plat number (S04-119) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 10. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Compliance with differential grading criteria or obtaining DSD/neighbor concurrence for the justification/mitigation shall be done at the tentative plat stage. 11. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 12. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the entrance, if applicable. 13. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 14. Please dimension the Ret./Det. basin. This aids in construction as well as inspection. 15. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 16. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required prior to any earthwork. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Please include percolation results in the DR in the next submittal along with the Soils report. 3. Please provide and existing conditions step-backwater analysis (HEC-2, HEC-RAS, by hand, other program or spreadsheet) to determine the water surface elevation and floodplain extent leaving the site. The proposed conditions flow should match the existing conditions at the property line and will probably require another analysis depending on what method is used to disperse the flow back to natural conditions. 4. Please grade basin to drain. 5. If the scour hole is below the basin floor, how will the scour hole drain? Please address. 6. Please provide safety barriers around the basin and the pipe inlet. Safety barriers will be needed along the curb scupper also. 7. Please provide hydro graphs for the existing and proposed peak flows for the pipe exiting the property. 8. Please demonstrate the transition of the flow into the inlet. 9. A manhole is required for storm drains in excess of a 10 degree bend per S.M.D.D.F.M. Chap. 10.9.1.8. This will slightly increase the head losses. The water surface at the inlet must be low enough to allow the upstream flows to freely fall into the inlet basin. Otherwise, the flow will tend to "skate" across the top of the backwater from the storm drain and outflank the storm drain system. Please demonstrate that the flow will fall into the inlet. 10. The velocity (too high) of the water exiting the weir does not match the existing velocity. The velocities and quantity must match existing conditions. 11. Please include calculations for scour hole sizing. 12. Inverts for the pipes do not match plan. Please revise. 13. Please dimension the basin. 14. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. 15. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office, (520) 879-8010 fax, C:/9100 E. Rosewood St. CDRC |
| 09/30/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 31, 2005. 2. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-119. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 3. It appears there is a portion of the overall subdivision, located in the southeast corner of Lots 7 and 8 which is zoned SR. The SR portion does not indicate it is excluded. Please clarify whether this portion is included or excluded from the subdivision. If applicable, revise general note two (2) to reflect the SR zone as well. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2) 4. Revise the zoning classification listed on the plat for the proerty (school) south of lots 8 and 9 to Rx-1 zoning. 5. Revise general note 22 to the following: "All lots comply with the minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet." (D.S. 2-03.2.4.B) 6. Under general note 23, the applicable designator is "G". Please add designator to note. 7. All existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plat, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. If an easement is to be recorded or abandoned by final plat, please so state. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.J) 8. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. (D.S. 2-10.3.2.E) (L.U.C. 3.6.1.5) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. |
| 10/01/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/01/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: SAVAGE ADDITION Lots 1-13 S04-119 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated August 21, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. The facilities along Igo Way must be shown on the plat. A copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within thirty (30) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 10/01/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | no comments |
| 10/01/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.” 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). Near and far side at the intersection of Savage Place and Rosewood Street, far side at Igo Way looking down Rosewood Street, near side Rosewood Street looking down Igo Way. 3. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing locations of no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 figure 20) D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/01/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | estimated daily travel - 124 |