Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-108
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/29/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/03/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/06/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * To date KB Homes Representative has not contacted David Bell at Environmental Services, 791-5414, to address the COT Landfill Ordinance. (CERTIFICATION LETTER RECEIVED BY ES ON JULY 14, 04 AND A COPY RECEIVED IN THIS OFFICE ON JAN. 3, 05) |
| 12/07/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | December 7, 2004 TO: Marty Magelli, P.E. Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Pantano Overlook, Lots 1-153, Blocks A & B and Common Area A Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S04-108 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project is hereby approved as submitted. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 12/09/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 9, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Pantano Overlook Tentative Plat S04-108 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 17 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Tentative Plat 1. As previously commented, show how the increased concentrated discharges will affect the Davidson Local Trail (as labeled on Sheets 2 and 3 of the Tentative Plat.) If the trail is incorrectly identified on the Tentative Plat, address the effects of the increased drainage on any existing or proposed trail along this project. 2. Show on the Tentative Plat how the increased discharge from the two new channels will be handled without causing an increase in erosion of the bank of the Pantano Wash. A complete discussion of the potential effects of the increased discharge on the existing and future sand and gravel pit as well as the on the banks of the wash must be presented in the drainage report. 3. Provide a six-foot sidewalk along the complete 22nd Street frontage.(3-01.2.7.A) 4. Show the improvements for the Riverpark that are to be provided along the Pantano Wash. 5. Revise the profile for street H so that it provides parking on both sides of the street or demonstrate that sufficient on-street parking is provided. (3-01.10 Figure 2) Drainage Report 6. As previously commented, the drainage report indicates that the existing direct discharges to the Pantano Wash are predominately sheet flow. The proposed drainage improvements concentrate much of the flow into two discharge locations. Show how that the concentrated discharges will not cause additional erosion or other adverse impacts on the adjacent properties or to the banks of the Pantano Wash. 7. As previously commented, permission from Pima County Flood Control District will be required for the increased volume and more concentrated discharges from this project. If additional flows are directed to the existing or future gravel pit, provide a notarized letter from the operator of the pit accepting the additional water. The operators of the gravel pit have told the City that they have rights to mine additional area in this vicinity. Address the effect of the increased discharge on the full extent of their mining right. (DS10-02.2.3.1.5.G) 8. As previously commented, discuss how the increased concentrated discharges may affect the Davidson Local Trail as shown on Sheets 2 and 3 of the Tentative Plat. If the trail is incorrectly identified on the Tentative Plat, address the effect on any existing or proposed trail in this area.(DS10-02.2.3.1.5.G) A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required when the Grading Permit is issued. Submit a revised TP, and a revised DR. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 12/13/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | This tentative plat has been approved with the following condition: 1. A change to the preliminary development plan submitted for the portion of the site to be rezoned from RX-1 to C-2 has been requested. If the rezoning condition/s change, a revised tentative plat addressing all rezoning conditions will be required to be submitted for review. l |
| 12/14/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-108 Pantano Overlook 12/13/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: December 13, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other: REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 12/10/04 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Pantano Overlook – S04-108: 2nd Review Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. 1. Lots that incorporate walls that are on or abut amenity areas such as, designated open space areas, common areas, and trail systems should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four feet, eight inches in height, except for pillars, with one foot six inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of community” on these areas. Please show the wall heights on the appropriate sheets. 2. Any proposed masonry screen wall around the perimeter of the subdivision, or within the development shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or a combination of the above materials. Please identify the location of the walls. Please provide a detail of all proposed walls in the development and indicate the materials that will be used. In addition please state on the detail that the walls will be graffiti-resistant. 3. To allow functional pedestrian circulation, construct a sidewalk along 22nd Street and connect the internal pedestrian circulation system with the sidewalk along 22nd Street. 4. The purpose of a RCP is to allow greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. Due to the size and location of this RCP there are numerous ways to have creative and enhanced design. Some of these include: Add visual interest and character with color, finished materials, massing, varying rooflines, and building orientation. Locating no more than two of the same types of house models in succession. Minimized garagescapes. This includes rear or side loading garages and emphasized front porches. Enhanced drought tolerant and native landscaping on the individual lots. Energy efficiency including but not limited to, location of canopy trees, building materials, and building orientation. Construct a percentage of homes for the low and moderately priced housing market. This property has numerous opportunities. Please address how the subdivision will have creativity, enhanced design, and be an asset to the community. 5. The title states lots 1-173. Please change to the appropriate 153 lots. |
| 12/15/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. As previously commented, wedge curbing encourages parking. Place vertical curb where there is to be no parking. This comment specifically addresses Street "H" south of Street "D." This section of roadway shall be required to have vertical curb (see DS3-01.0 fig 1) and show the no parking signs in the section view (section 2/1). 2. I think the subtitle of Section 2/1 should read "no homes fronting on Street "H." 3. Traffic Engineering is in receipt of and concurs with the submitted Traffic Impact Study. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/16/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |