Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-108
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/25/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved August 25, 2004. |
| 08/27/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-108 PANTANO OVERLOOK / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: AUGUST 24, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Label approved interior Street names on Final Plat. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** sg |
| 08/30/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the tentative plat and landscape related plans to show the same number of lots and/or blocks in the same locations. 2) Show the limits of grading/disturbance on the landscape/NPP plans. 3) Revise the plans as requested by other agencies and revise the landscape plans as appropriate. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 08/30/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Development is w/in 1000 feet of Prudence and Broadway South Landfills. Contact David Bell at Environmental Services, 791-5414, for landfill ordinance compliance.(Certification letter received December 10, 2004.) * Refuse service will be individual APC containers for curb side service. * On-site storage is required for two 90 gallon cotainers. Containers to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service. |
| 09/02/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-108 BAKER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC. PANTANO OVERLOOK |
| 09/02/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-108 Pantano Overlook 09/02/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: September 20, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other: REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 08/27/04 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Pantano Overlook – S04-108: 1st Review Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. 1. The landscape plan does not show the sizes of the proposed the trees. Please label the tree sizes in the landscape legend. Also, please show the type of vegetation that will be used. 2. The General Plan and Design Guidelines Manual state that common areas should be used for open space and as additional active or passive recreational amenities. Please locate amenities such as; shade trees, picnic tables, benches, barbecues, tot lot, etc. in the designated park areas. Please show these amenities on the appropriate landscape plan pages. Please make the amenities handicapped accessible by an all-weather path. 3. Lots that incorporate walls that are on or abut amenity areas such as, designated open space areas, common areas, and trail systems should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four feet, eight inches in height, except for pillars, with one foot six inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of community” on these areas. 4. Any proposed masonry screen wall around the perimeter of the subdivision, or within the development shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or a combination of the above materials. Please identify the location of the walls. Please provide a detail of all proposed walls in the development and indicate the materials that will be used. In addition please state on the detail that the walls will be graffiti-resistant. 5. Please provide a landscaped pedestrian corridor along the Pantano Wash, as approved by City of Tucson Parks Department. Please connect the corridor with the internal sidewalk system, via a handicapped accessible all weather path. 6. It is required that on lots less than 4,000 square feet the following is required: floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each type of unit, showing exterior dimensions, building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions, and a list indicating which models will fit on which lots. 7. The purpose of a RCP is to allow greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. Due to the size and location of this RCP there are numerous ways to have creative and enhanced design. Some of these include: Add visual interest and character with color, finished materials, massing, varying rooflines, and building orientation. Locating no more than two of the same types of house models in succession. Minimized garagescapes. This includes rear or side loading garages and emphasized front porches. Enhanced drought tolerant and native landscaping on the individual lots. Energy efficiency including but not limited to, location of canopy trees, building materials, and building orientation. Construct a percentage of homes for the low and moderately priced housing market. This property has numerous opportunities. Please address and show how the subdivision will have creativity, enhanced design, and be an asset to the community. 8. The landscape plan and tentative plat do not match. The tentative plat has 153 lots and does not show development along 22nd Street. The landscape plan has 173 lots and shows residential development along 22nd Street. Please fix the discrepancy. |
| 09/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: PANTANO OVERLOOK Lots 1-153 S04-108 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated August 18, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along 22nd Street proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within twenty two (22) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 09/17/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 14, 2004 TO: Marty Magelli, Baker & Associates THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Pantano Overlook, Lots 1-153, and Blocks A & B, an RCP Project and Common Area A - Submittal S04-108 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project D99-077, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-108, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Add project reference number D99-077 to the title block. SHEET 1. Replace General Note 17 with ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 09/17/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 17, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Pantano Overlook Tentative Plat S04-108 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 17 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Tentative Plat 1. Show lot drainage patterns for all lots. Discuss the sizing and erosion protection design for wall openings for lots 1-24. (DS 2-03.2.4.L.2) 2. Show how the increased concentrated discharges affect the Davidson Local Trail. (DS10-02.2.3.1.5.G) 3. Revise the drainage scheme so that street flow is a maximum of 50 cfs in all areas. Show that 10-year flows will be completely contained between the curbs. (DS 3-01.4.4.B) 4. Provide clear details for grading of perimeter lots. Provide contour information for adjacent properties. Show how pad grades will be achieved while not cutting or filling within 2 feet of the project boundary. Show how transitions from natural grade to pad grade will be achieved for lots 1-23. (DS 11-01.9) 5. Revise the sight visibility triangles (SVT) so that they follow the curb line where the through side street curves. (DS 3-01.5.1.B.3 and Figure 18) 6. Provide a six-foot sidewalk along the complete 22nd Street frontage.(3-01.2.7.A) 7. Revise the profile for street H so that it provides parking on both sides of the street. (3-01.10 Figure 2) Drainage Report 8. The drainage report indicates that the existing direct discharges to the Pantano Wash are predominately sheet flow. The proposed drainage improvements concentrate much of the flow into two discharge locations. Show how that the concentrated discharges will not cause additional erosion or other adverse impacts on the adjacent properties or to the banks of the Pantano Wash. 9. Permission from Pima County Flood Control District will be required for the increased volume and more concentrated discharges from this project. If additional flows are directed to the existing gravel pit, provide a notarized letter from the operator of the pit accepting the additional discharge. (DS10-02.2.3.1.5.G) 10. Show how the increased concentrated discharges affect the Davidson Local Trail. (DS10-02.2.3.1.5.G) 11. Revise the drainage scheme so that street flow is a maximum of 50 cfs in all areas. Show that 10-year flows will be completely contained between the curbs. (DS 3-01.4.4.B) 12. Address long term maintenance responsibilities for the drainage channels and erosion protection. Provide a detailed maintenance checklist and identify the parties responsible for inspection and maintenance. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.2.E and DS 10-2.2.3.1.6.C) A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required when the Grading Permit is issued. Submit a revised TP, and a revised DR. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 09/17/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: September 15, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-108 Pantano Overlook T141517 (134-14) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. The basis of bearing must be in the general notes, whether it is in an attached legal description or not. Remove the shading from the streets. On sheet 2, remove or dash the line between the two Common Area “A”’s located by Block B. The item between lots 7 and 8 needs to be a dashed line, otherwise it looks like another parcel. Add the square footage for the Common Area “A” on the east side. Add the bearings for the lot lines. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 09/22/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 22, 2005. 2. Since a change of rezoning condition is being requested by the applicant, the tentative plat resubmittal shall reflect all applicable rezoning conditions and tentative plat requirements. The following comments do not reflect the existing rezoning case C9-95-06. 3. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-108. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 4. All existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plat, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. If an easement is to be recorded or abandoned by final plat, please so state. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.J) 5. Under general note 25, indicate by note how many and which units will be provided with barrier-free accessibility in conformance with Sec.3.6.1.4.A.5 of the LUC. The tentative plat should reflect how accessibility will be accomplished. Barrier-free access, as applied under this criterion, is access from a street and/or a parking spaces to the front door of a unit. (D.S. 2-10.3.1.D) 6. Add the following general note: "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council." (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.10) 7. Proposed site coverage percentage is incorrect, please revise. (LUC 3.6.1.4.B) (D.S. 2-10.3.1.C) 8. Provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner lot, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard and street yard setback. These typicals are to be fully dimensioned and are to be drawn at a larger scale than the tentative plat. (D.S. 2-10.3.1.B) 9. Revise the lot setback requirements for all streets to be based on an ADT over 140 but less than 1,000. Residential ADT for single-family dwellings is 10.0 per unit. ADT counts for each street exceed 140 ADT. 10. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. (D.S. 2-10.3.2.E) (L.U.C. 3.6.1.5) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/22/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no objections. |
| 09/22/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.” 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M) 3. Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision at a ratio of one parking space per welling within the subdivision. (DS 3-01.2.4.D) Section 2 (sht 1/3) does not meet this requirement. A DSMR will be required and will be supported by this division to allow no parking in this section. If the DSMR is granted, this section of roadway shall be required to have vertical curb (see DS3-01.0 fig 1) and show the no parking signs in the section view. 4. None of the interior streets will have ADTs less than 140, contrary to the note in the Lot Setback requirements. 5. Reposition the handicap access ramps on the east side of street "A" and the west side of street "H" to align perpendicularly across the centerline of said streets with one or the other access ramps across the street. 6. A category I TIA will be required for this development IAW TAMG 6.3.2 D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) |
| 09/28/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments |
| 09/30/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approv-Cond | DATE: September 30, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-108 Pantano Overlook: Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services The plat is conditionally approved provided the developer and the Parks and Recreation Department can come to an agreement regarding an appropriate contribution for development of the Pantano Riverpark which is adjacent to the subject development. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/30/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |