Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-107
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/18/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/19/2004 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: EL RANCHO MERLITA Lots 1-17 S04-107 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated November 17, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing junction cabinet to the south of the project, the existing pole west of the project, and the pole north of the project. As you are aware, there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 11/19/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved November 19, 2004. |
| 11/29/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide the easement and path required in rezoning condition 10 or have the conditions modified. C9-04-06 WASH PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL. Based upon materials received to date the Landscape Section is prepared to recommend approval of the WASH Plans. Additional revisions may necessitate an additional review. |
| 11/30/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | November 24, 2004 TO: Steven Hill, P.E. Lodestar Engineering Company, LLC THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: El Rancho Merlita, Lots 1-17 and Common Areas A & B Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S04-107 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project is hereby approved as submitted. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 11/30/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-107 EL RANCHO MERLITA/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Camimo Rancho Merlita to Corte El Rancho Merlita. Correct lot numbers on pg. 3. jg |
| 12/01/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: December 1, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 8520 E. Wrightstown Road Tentative Plat S04-107 (Second Review) T14S, 15E, Section 04 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Mitigation Plan. The Development Plan (DP) and Mitigation Plan (MP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Proposed street section, the R/W width does not meet COT standards per D.S. 3-01.10, figures 1 through 3. As per our conversation, the TP cannot be approved prior to the DSMR approval. 3. Add note to TP stating that lots affected by the 100-year flood plain limits may require a Flood Plain Use permit. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The SVT's are not shown correctly. The "PI" is located at the edges of the new pavement and the "arm" should also connect to the edge of pavement. Future SVT's need to be on the TP or a letter from TDOT stating that Wrightstown Road will not be widened to future width will be required. 5. The bleeder pipe for the det./ret. basin should shorted, due to maintenance factors, then the rip-rap splash pad could be taken out of the resource area and lessen the area of disturbance. Drainage Report: 1. The DR is accepted for TP purposes only. Final acceptance will be done at the Grading plan stage. 2. Show the project address on the cover of the DR. Mitigation Plan: 1. As stated in comment 6 of the TP, by shortening the bleeder pipe for the det./ret. basin and removing the rip-rap splash pad from the resource area, this would considerably lessen the are of disturbance. 2. The MP is accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 8520 E. Wrightstown Road TP 2 |
| 12/03/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-107 El Rancho Merlita, Lots 1-17 and Common Areas "A" and "B" Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: November 3, 2004 DUE DATE: November 30, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 22, 2005. 2. Please submit a copy of the authorized memo listing all conditions of rezoning for review and verification. DS 2-03.2.2.B.3 3. This comment has been left as reference until resolution of the DSMR. Please be advised that additional comments may be forthcoming based on the next submittal packet. The proposed street cross section for the interior streets do not meet street standards for required parking on both sides. The proposed street cross section depicts two ten-foot wide travel lanes with concrete headers. The street must be provided with vertical curbs and a minimum of five feet for a pedestrian refuge along the entire length of both sides of the streets. Also, if street sidewalks will not be constructed, concrete driveways are required from the street curb to the garage. With the proposed street cross section proposed without on street parking on either side of the street, visitor parking spaces must be provided in a common area at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling unit in the subdivision. The tentative plat depicts bumpouts (or pull out parking spaces) for visitor parking along both sides of the street and is labeled as a 10-foot PUE and parking easement. Thirteen bump outs have been provided to accommodate a total of fourteen spaces (one of the bumpouts appears to be long enough for two spaces. Seventeen parking spaces must be provided to meet the ratio requirement. It is also preferable that the parking spaces be part of the Street common area rather than easement. Per DS 3-01 cross section Figure-1, the cross section may be used as depicted as long as visitor parking is provided in common areas and distributed evenly throughout the subdivision. The five-foot pedestrian area must be a full five-foot wide behind the bump outs as well as along the street frontage. Provide a street cross section that depicts the visitor parking bumpouts and label and dimension the bumpouts and the pedestrian refuge area. On street parking spaces or as depicted in the bump outs must be a minimum of eight feet wide and twenty-three feet long. Label the length and width of the typical bumpouts. The 23 feet length does not include the angled portion of the bump out. Add a typical detail drawing of a lot depicting the required concrete driveway from the vertical. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this issue based on the revisions to the street cross sections. DS 2-03.2.4.G 4. The previous comment was not addressed. Please submit a copy of the final letter that authorized the rezoning conditions. Also, a separate response letter that states how all the rezoning conditions have been dealt with, must be submitted with the next submittal packet. As indicated in comment 4 the conditions of rezoning must be listed on the plat. Please submit a response letter with the next submittal packet of the tentative plat stating how all conditions of rezoning have been met. Submit for review all required documents as stated in the rezoning conditions. 5. The Zoning Review Section cannot approve the tentative plat until the DSMR has been approved. If the DSMR is approved, please list on the tentative plat the case number, date of approval, and list the conditions of approval. If the DSMR is conditionally approved please revise the drawings and incorporate all the conditions of approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04107tp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 12/06/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: December 2, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-107 El Rancho Merlita: Tentative Plat Review Resubmittal CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Indicate a public, non-motorized trail easement that coincides with and occupies the same area in space as Common Area A will be dedicated by final plat. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/06/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-107 El Rancho Merlita 12/06/04 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-06 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/01/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other - Elevations REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 11/29/04 Rancho Merlita – S-04-107 Condition 6. – All residential units shall be designed using four-sided architecture and shall include a variety of rooflines. The applicant shall provide detailed and dimensioned elevations with the subdivision plat at the time of review by the Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Discussion: In your response, you stated that a note has been added to the cover sheet addressing this comment. However, we are asking that you provide detailed elevations illustrating four-sided architecture showing massing, and varying rooflines. Also include a color palette, and the type of finished materials that will be utilized for architectural compliance and compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. |
| 12/06/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-107 El Rancho Merlita 12/16/04 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-06 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/14/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other - REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 12/17/04 Rancho Merlita – S-04-107 Condition 6. – All residential units shall be designed using four-sided architecture and shall include a variety of rooflines. The applicant shall provide detailed and dimensioned elevations with the subdivision plat at the time of review by the Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Discussion: Per phone conversation with applicant on 12/14/04, note #40 under the General Notes section will suffice the above requirement. Note #40 reads as follows: Architecture will vary and reflect old southern Arizona and Sonoran Styles, including but not limited to Ranch Mission Revival, Spanish Colonial Revival, Sonoran, and Bungalow. Colors and finishes to be compatible with architectural style. Buildings will be limited to 25 feet high maximum. All walls visible from public right-of-ways to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatments, such as; the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, adobe, or metal; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; and/or trees and shrubbery in voids created by wall variations. All outdoor pole and building lighting shall be full cut-off lighting-directed down and away from residential parcels and public roads. No resubmittal required. |
| 12/09/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/09/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |