Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-107
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/26/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Development in and near the Robb Wash is subject to TCC Article VIII Sec. 29-16(b). The review procedure for such projects has changed recently. Refer TCC 23A-50 and TCC 23A-51 for information. (Ord. 9967, eff. 7/01/04) A pre-application conference is required. 2) A native plant preservation plan is required for off-site development depicted on sheet 5 prior to approval of permits. 3) Provide the easement and path required in rezoning condition 10. C9-04-06 4) Show the limits of grading and areas of non-disturbance on the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.2.B 5) A conceptual grading plan showing areas of cut and fill is necessary per DS 2-03.2.4.K. 6) The native plant preservation plan indicates "preserved-in place" trees within a proposed sewer easement. Revise as necessary. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, PUBLIC NOTICE, AND WASH PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL. |
| 08/27/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | The Tentative Plat is denied August 27, 2004. 1. Sheet 2 of 5. Gates must provide a minimum of 20 feet clear, unobstructed access. Provide gate detail and indicate method of emegency fire apparatus ingress ( lock box). 2. Sheet 4 of 5. Indicate fire lane signs provided on both sides of streets for Street Sections 1, 2, and 3. 3. Provide the following General Notes on the plan: a. " On street parking shall be prohibited on both sides and signs shall be installed so indicating." b. " Fire lane signs shall be provided as needed to provide 20 feet clear unobstructed width along all fire apparatus roadways in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code. Plans for location and installation of sighs shall be submitted for Fire Department review prior to submitting site plans for Paving and Grading permits." |
| 08/30/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill w/in 1000' of this development. * Gated community - Will require access code for collection vehicles. * 20' roadway will require no parking signs. * Refuse collection to be curbside collection. * Onsite storage required for two 90 gallon APC's per unit. * APC's are to be placed and removed from the collection area on the collection day. |
| 09/01/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-107 EL RANCHO MERLITA/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 8/24/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: On Location Map change Wright Stone Square Bk 43, Pg 11 to Wrightstown Square Bk 37, Pg 91, change Hidden Hills Bk 28, Pg 55 to Pg 68 and change Hidden Hills Bk 20, Pg 68 to Pg 25. Delete 8520 E. Wrightstown Road Administrative Address on pg. 1. On Site Plan and pg. 2 change Saguaro Place to Saguaro Verde and change Brentwood Estates Book 37, Page 91 to Book 43, Page 11 on Site Plan and pg. 3. El Rancho Merlita will require Spanish review and a Spanish suffix Corte or Placita. Also, there will need to be two different street names both with the suffix of Corte or Placita. Change Marlena Circle to Marlena Circle North on pg. 3. |
| 09/02/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-107 LODESTAR ENGINEERING EL RANCHO MERLITA |
| 09/07/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: September 7, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 8520 E. Wrightstown Road Tentative Plat S04-107 (First Review) T14S, 15E, Section 04 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Proposed street section, R/W width does not meet COT standards per D.S. 3-01.10, figures 1 through 3. Please revise. 4. The Camino Seco wash is labeled as a Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat on the Tucson Department of Transportation maps. The W.A.S.H. ordinance regulations will apply for this wash. Perhaps leaving the wash natural may be an alternative. 5. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 8. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 9. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 10. Complete TP number (S04-107) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 11. Per section 13 - Fills of the 2000 IBC, fills cannot exceed 2' from the existing grade at any point within 100' of the boundary. Please revise lot 6 to reflect this requirement. 12. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 13. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain in a surveyable manner and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 14. Please include a boundary closure calculations with your next submittal. 15. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 16. Please coordinate with COT parks and recreation of the location of the pedestrian trail along Robb Wash. 17. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 18. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. Drainage Report: 1. The DR was reviewed for TP purposes only. Final acceptance will be done at the Grading plan stage. 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR 3. The Camino Seco wash is labeled as a Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat on the Tucson Department of Transportation maps. The W.A.S.H. ordinance regulations will apply for this wash. 4. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. (Cam. Seco Wash). 5. The data in the DR for the Camino Seco wash cannot be reviewed without a mitigation plan and without the W.A.S.H. criteria considered. Perhaps leaving the wash natural may be an alternative. 6. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain in a surveyable manner and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 7. It seems that the client will be responsible for the sizing and replacement of the crossing of the Camino Seco wash to the existing residences and the improvements to the existing CBC at Robb Wash and Wrighstown wash. Please address. 8. Show the project address on the cover of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 8520 E. Wrightstown Road TP |
| 09/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: El Rancho Merlita Lots 1-17 S04-107 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated August 18, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. All the existing facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. A copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. There are some conflicts with the existing facilities. The facilities that are to be relocated must be removed by the customer's request. You may contact Frank Kilpatrick, Design Build Department at (520) 918-8227, regarding the apparent conflicts. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. Also, for your information, our above ground facilities cannot be placed in the Public Utility Easement if this easement is to be used for parking as well. We will require a separate easement outside of the parking easement. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 09/17/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 16, 2004 TO: Steven Hill, P.E., Lodestar Engineering THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: El Rancho Merlita, Lots 1-17 and Common Areas A & B - Submittal S04-017 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. A capacity letter from PCWWM Planning Services signed by Ilene Deckard, has been received. Based on the preliminary evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-017, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 9 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. SHEET 1. Change the last sentence of General Note 12 to read SEWER SERVICE FOR LOTS 13 & 14 WILL REMAIN ON-SITE SEPTIC. IN THE EVENT THAT THE ON-SITE SEPTIC SYSTEMS FOR EITHER LOT 13 OR LOT 14 FAILS, THE OWNER OF THE LOT WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONNECT TO THE PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM. SHEET 2. Show any existing public sewer lines that are within 100 feet of the project boundaries. Additionally, the sewer line size and Pima County plan number shall be shown as well. SHEET 2. Show the number for the existing manhole shown on this sheet. SHEET 2. Revise the slope from manhole 6 to manhole 3 to be one percent. SHEET 3. Extend manhole 5 to the cul-de-sac as lots 13 and 14 will likely have to connect to the sewer network at some point in the future. SHEET 4. Show the number of the existing manhole shown on the detail. SHEET 4. Show the public sewer line, its size and the Pima County plan number for the public sewer line serving the existing manhole shown on this sheet. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 09/17/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: September 15, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-107 El Rancho Merlita T141504 (133-07) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the bearings to the lot lines. Add the tie to the section corner. If there area any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 09/23/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-107 El Rancho Merlita, Lots 1-17 and Common Areas "A" and "B" Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: September 21, 2004 DUE DATE: September 20, 2004 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 23, 2004. 2. Add the owner's phone number to the Owner/Developer text block. DS 2-03.2.2.A.1 3. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S04-107. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. List on the tentative plat sheets the conditions of rezoning verbatim as authorized by Mayor and Council. Please submit a copy of the authorized memo listing all conditions of rezoning for review and verification. DS 2-03.2.2.B.3 5. List as a general note the existing and proposed use of the property. List the following as the general note for the proposed use: "Proposed use is Single Family Dwelling DD "F" subject to LUC section 3.5.7.1.F." 6. This site is subject to the requirements of the MS&R overlay. Add a general that states that this site has been designed to meet the criteria of the Major Street and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone, LUC Section 2.8.3. Also if this site is subject to W.A.S.H. ordinance a separate review and approval will be required unless development has been verified by the Engineering section to be fifty feet or more outside the study area. In addition a general note stating that this site is subject to the criteria of the WASH ordinance of the Tucson Code and has been designed to comply will all the requirements. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 7. On single family projects bounded or intersected by a Major Street or Route, list the following note: "Lots with frontage on a street designated a Major Street or Route shall have ingress-egress designed in a manner so that motor vehicles do not back out onto the Major Street or Route, through the use of circular drives, turnarounds, or other similar solutions." See related comments by the Engineering reviewer. DS 2-023.2.2.D.2 8. Draw, label and dimension future curb and sidewalk locations along the Wrightstown Road right-of-way. It is necessary for this information to be on the plat to reference MS&R street building setbacks. DS 2-03.2.3.D 9. Delineate and label all areas on the plat associated with Common Area "B" and list the square footage of the Common areas labeled as C.A. "B". DS 2-03.2.4.C 10. The proposed street cross section for the interior streets do not meet street standards for required parking on both sides. The proposed street cross section depicts two ten-foot wide travel lanes with concrete headers. The street must be provided with vertical curbs and a minimum of five feet for a pedestrian refuge along the entire length of both sides of the streets. Also, if street sidewalks will not be constructed, concrete driveways are required from the street curb to the garage. With the proposed street cross section proposed without on street parking on either side of the street, visitor parking spaces must be provided in a common area at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling unit in the subdivision. The tentative plat depicts bumpouts (or pull out parking spaces) for visitor parking along both sides of the street and is labeled as a 10-foot PUE and parking easement. Thirteen bump outs have been provided to accommodate a total of fourteen spaces (one of the bumpouts appears to be long enough for two spaces. Seventeen parking spaces must be provided to meet the ratio requirement. It is also preferable that the parking spaces be part of the Street common area rather than easement. Per DS 3-01 cross section Figure-1, the cross section may be used as depicted as long as visitor parking is provided in common areas and distributed evenly throughout the subdivision. The five-foot pedestrian area must be a full five feet wide behind the bump outs as well as along the street frontage. Provide a street cross section that depicts the visitor parking bumpouts and label and dimension the bumpouts and the pedestrian refuge area. On street parking spaces or as depicted in the bump outs must be a minimum of eight feet wide and twenty-three feet long. Label the length and width of the typical bumpouts. The 23 feet length does not include the angled portion of the bump out. Add a typical detail drawing of a lot depicting the required concrete driveway from the vertical. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this issue based on the revisions to the street cross sections. DS 2-03.2.4.G 11. Please clarify if the public trail is to be dedicated to the City of Tucson, Pima County or other public entity or will the trail remain under the common ownership of the proposed subdivision home owner's association. DS 2-023.2.4.I 12. Draw and label the following items on the plan. The Wrightstown Road street perimeter building setback for lots 4, 5, and 6, subdivision perimeter building setback for lots 11, 12 , 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17. Also add a note or draw a lot typical that depicts the interior perimeter building setbacks of 20 feet and the street building from the privates streets as allowed per LUC section 3.2.6.5. DS 2-03.2.4.M 13. As indicated in comment 4 the conditions of rezoning must be listed on the plat. Please submit a response letter with the next submittal packet of the tentative plat stating how all conditions of rezoning have been met. Submit for review all required documents as stated in the rezoning conditions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04107tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 09/24/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: September 23, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-107 El Rancho Merlita: Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Indicate a public, non-motorized trail easement that coincides with Common Area A will be dedicated. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/24/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-107 El Rancho Merlita 09/21/04 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-06 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/20/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 9/20/04 Rancho Merlita – S-04-107 The proposed El Rancho Merlita Subdivision is located at 8520 W. Wrightstown Road, with Robb Wash running along the whole western portion of the site. The subject property consists of a parcel of approximately 12.74 acres that is in the process of rezoning (Case C9-04-06). The rezoning request is to rezone from SR to RX-2 zoning. In addition, to reviewing the proposed project for conformance with Plan policies, the plans are being reviewed for conformance with the Mayor and Council conditions, as found on the City Clerk’s letter dated July 2, 2004. Discussion: A list of the Mayor and Council approval conditions is to be located in the General Notes section of on the tentative plat. Condition 6. – All residential units shall be designed using four-sided architecture and shall include a variety of rooflines. The applicant shall provide detailed and dimensioned elevations with the subdivision plat at the time of review by the Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Discussion: Please provide detailed elevations illustrating four-sided architecture showing massing, and varying rooflines. Also include a color palette, and the type of finished materials that will be utilized for architectural compliance and compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. Condition 7 – All residential units shall be limited to one-story and shall not exceed 25 feet in height. Discussion: Please provide elevations illustrating how this condition will be met. Condition 11- All walls visible from a public right-of-way and/or adjacent to existing residential development, are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one (1) or more visually appealing design treatments, such as the sue of two (2) or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments, (job, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations. Discussion: Please show that all walls visible from a public right-of-way are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one of more visually appealing design treatments, such as; the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; and/or, trees and shrubbery in voids created by wall variations. Condition 13 – All outdoor pole and building lighting shall be full cut-off lighting – directed down and away from residential parcels and public roads. Discussion: Please provide a detail of lighting. |
| 09/28/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments |
| 09/28/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/28/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments |
| 09/28/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.” 2. Wrightstown Road is within the City of Tucson jurisdiction. General note 26 should read "City of Tucson" vice Pima County. 3. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing locations of no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 figure 21) 4. Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision at a ratio of one parking space per welling within the subdivision. (DS 3-01.2.4.D) If providing common parking areas, vertical curbing must be used (DS 3-01.0 fig 1) vice the concrete headers shown. Show no parking signs in section 1/4. 5. The "pullout" parking area depicted near lots 14/15 appears to lie within the required no parking area of the cul-de-sac. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |