Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-102
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/10/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved November 10, 2004. |
| 11/17/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-102 ALLEN ROAD TOWNHOMES / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** sg |
| 11/19/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Comments from previous submittal have all been addressed to satisfaction. Thank you. 2. The driveways as depicted on sheet 4/4 do not meet criterion as established in Tucson City Code, Chapter 25 section 38. Maximum driveway width for 2 adjoining properties is 30'. These appear to be closer to 40'. Single driveways shall be separated by a minimum of 12'. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/23/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Second Engineering review of the Allen Road Townhomes Tentative Plat. The activity number is S04-102. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on November 10, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP, DR GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a recent Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert, 791-5550 for submittal requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal. 8. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. The 10 ft. PUE shown on Detail A Sheet 2 is not shown on the plan Sheet 3. 2. Street section B and C are incorrect. Parking and sidewalks are required on both sides of the street. If a DSMR is obtained note this on the plat. 3. The area behind lots 14-18 appears to be common area but it is not labeled. Identify this area. 4. Lot to lot drainage is proposed for lots 6-13. Maintenance of these drainage structures must be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Lot perimeter walls will not be permitted in the easement area, as these would block access. Note on the plat that walls are not allowed in this area. 5. Lot to lot drainage is proposed for lots 6-13. An appropriate drainage structure (swale) must be provided to channalize the flow. Also, a sidewalk scupper must be provided between lots 9 and 10 where the flow exits the lots. The drainage report must size these structures. 6. Detail I shows that all the lots are both front and rear draining. It is assumed that lots 14-18 and 1-5 will drain out the back to the common area. Drainage structures must be provided to direct this flow. Show on the plat and provide appropriate calculations in the Drainage Report. 7. All screen walls on the plat that require flow through openings must be shown as such. The screen wall on the north side of the property needs to be labeled. 8. Show a detail of the weir structure. The drainage report shows a section through the wall and along the wall which properly details the weir. Show these on the plat. DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Size all drainage structures. See Tentative Plat comments. James C. Tate, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer |
| 11/23/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-102 Allen Road Townhomes 11/23/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: November 22, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 11/19/2004 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Allen Road Townhomes – S04-102 – 2nd submittal Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Northside Area Plan and Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. 1. Please show what type of amenities such as picnic tables, benches, barbecues, shade shelter, etc. will be located in the “Picnic Area” in Common Area C. In regards to the pedestrian path in the common area, at minimum, please construct the portions from the sidewalk along Chartres Avenue to the two picnic areas as a sidewalk equal to the standards as the sidewalks in the subdivision. 2. Any proposed masonry screen wall around the perimeter of the subdivision, or within the development should be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. Please label on the detail that the proposed walls in the development will be graffiti-resistant. |
| 11/24/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/24/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/06/2004 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: ALLEN ROAD TOWNHOMES Lots 1-19 S04-102 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review. As you are aware, there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 12/08/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |