Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-086
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/14/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Provide the following General Notes on the plan: a. On street parking shall be prohibited on one/both sides and signs shall be installed so indicating. b. "No Parking-Fire Lane" signs shall be provided as needed to provide 20 feet clear unobstructed width along all fire access roadways in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code.Plans for locations of signs shall be submitted for Fire Department review and approval prior to submitting site plans for Paving and Grading permits. 2. Revise "36.5' P.A.A.L. X-SECTION" to indicate fire lane sign on travel lane side of roadway. Revise "30' P.A.A.L. X-SECTION" to indicate fire lane signs on both sides of roadway. |
| 07/23/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 26, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-086 Encanto Village T141409 (125-11) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove the shading from Common Area “A”. Add bearings for the lot lines. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 26, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-086 Encanto Village T141409 (125-11) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove the shading from Common Area “A”. Add bearings for the lot lines. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 26, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-086 Encanto Village T141409 (125-11) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove the shading from Common Area “A”. Add bearings for the lot lines. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King v |
| 07/27/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: ENCANTO VILLAGE Lots 1-10 S04-086 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated June 24, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along Fourth Street. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. As you are aware, there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision. These facilities are currently serving existing customers; the facilities will only be removed by customer request. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8479. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 08/02/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | *Not within 1000 ft. of any known landfill. *OK for individual APC's in front of the lots off the PAAL. *Clarification is required as to access along the east side of the PAAL. If there is access to the adjacent lots then refuse service cannot be provided along the east side with the right turning movement onto 5th Street. |
| 08/06/2004 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: August 6, 2004 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Encanto Village: Tentative Plat. The activity number is S04-086. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on July 15, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP, DR GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section 13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert, 791-5550 for submittal requirements. 8. All proposed easements must be shown in a surveyable manner on the Final Plat. The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. All lettering and dimensions must be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or when photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record keeping purposes. Change the font to twelve point or greater for plat legibility. DS 2-03.2.1.C. 2. Place the subdivision case number (S04-086) in the lower right hand corner of each sheet adjacent to the Title Block. 3 The north arrow, contour interval, and scale should be placed together on each sheet preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. Add the contour interval to the north arrow and scale located in the upper right hand corner. DS 2-03.2.1.H. 4. To general note number 20 add the verbiage, "All public roads." DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.a. 5. The plat must be legible. For plan clarity relocate the verbiage pertaining to the 30' Public ROW for 5th Street. The verbiage is located directly on top of the sewer line line/symbol. DS 2-03.2.3.D. 6. Per the MS&R ROW map, 5th street is a collector street, not an arterial street. Change the verbiage, "arterial" to "collector." DS 2-03.2.3.D. 7. Street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan will be shown. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Per the MS&R Plan the future ½ ROW width for 5th Street is 45'. Label and dimension the Future ROW width for 5th Street from centerline. Dedicate right-of-way prior to Tentative Plat approval. DS 2-03. DS 2-03.2.4.H. 8. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Dimension and give a detail for the proposed access easements. DS 2-03.2.4.J. 9. The private street is not a PAAL. A PAAL is a parking area access lane accessing the parking on one lot. The private street accesses ten lots. Remove the PAAL verbiage from all relative places (on plan and sections). 10. Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01. Minimum pavement widths are specified in 3-01.2.3. Parking is required on both sides of the street. DS 3-01.2.4. The requirement is to have 7' parking and a 5' sidewalk on both sides of the street. See DS 3-01 Figure 2. Revise the plat. DS 2-03.2.4.F. 11. Detail 2 street section says one way travel lane. The section shows two lanes. Minimum width for a one-way street is 12 ft. Sidewalks are required on both sides of the street. DS 3-01.2.3.A and DS 3-01.2.7.A 12. Show, label, and dimension to existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks on 4th and 5th. Label as existing or proposed. 13. On the plat it appears the curb is wedged but the cross-section depicts a vertical curb. Clearly indicate what type of curb is being used on the plat. 14. Show the 100-year peak ponding limits on the plat. List the top of basin elevation, bottom of basin elevation, 100-yr. peak water surface elevation (WSEL). DS 2- 03.2.4.L.1. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.A 15. Provide proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage. Or, as an alternative, provide a typical lot drainage detail and provide one elevation on each lot. Indicate on the plat proposed ground elevations (finish grades) for common area "A" and "B". DS 2- 03.2.4.L.4. 16. The plat shows a right-of -way width of 12.57 ft. for 5th. Was this a separate right- of-way dedication from the 30 ft. (M&P 3/107) shown on the plat? Is the actual total right-of-way width 42.57? Clarify on the plat. DS 2-03.2.3.D 17. Show the proposed FFE for Lot 1. The finish floor elevation must be 1 ft. above the 100-yr. peak WSEL for the basin. Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, SDRM, 3.5.1.10 18. Clearly show on the plat and in detail the dimensions and elevations (top, invert, etc.) of the directional vane type inlet grate. Specify the type. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4.a. 19. Show, label and dimension the pipe from the grate to the basin. Show and specify the proposed bank protection at the outlet. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.A.4.A DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The drainage on this property runs from the south to the north. On page 3 of the drainage report under the existing conditions it is stated the general slope runs from the north to the south. This is incorrect. Stormwater must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under natural or existing conditions. Please revise this section of the report to state that the general slope/drainage patterns for the property runs from the south to the north. 2. A soils report and percolation test is required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility that utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The basin must infiltrate in 12 hours. The soils report must also provide a recommended minimum basin setback from buildings. SDRM 3.5.1.5. and SMDDFM 14.2.6. 3. Finish Floor Elevation (FFE) of structures must be a minimum of one foot above the 100-yr. peak WSEL of any adjacent basin. It is not clear if lot 1 is 1' above the 100- yr. peak WSEL. Clearly indicate in the drainage report the 100-yr. peak WSEL. DS 2-03.2.4.L.4. 4. Indicate on the plat the location and size of the access and maintenance access ramps. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4.b. 5. Per SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.C., a very detailed Drainageway and Detention/Retention Basin Maintenance Checklist and Schedule shall be provided by an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer, which will be followed by anyone performing scheduled and unscheduled maintenance on behalf of the owner(s). A maintenance checklist and schedule shall be provided in the drainage report in effort to clearly communicate the responsibilities involved by the homeowner association for proper maintenance of retention basins. Include a detailed retention basin maintenance checklist and schedule in the drainage report. 6. All drainage structures must be sized in the Drainage Report. Specify the type and size of the proposed grate. Show the appropriate calculations used to size the grate. Specify assumed ponding depth, invert, tailwater depth, etc. Provide computer summary (Flowmaster for example) if so used. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.5.C 7. All drainage structures must be sized in the Drainage Report. Specify the type and size of the proposed pipe from the grate to the basin. Show the appropriate calculations used to size the pipe. Specify assumed headwater depth, invert at inlet and outlet, slope, tailwater depth, etc. Provide computer summary (Flowmaster for example) if so used. Specify proposed outlet bank protection. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.5.C. Patricia Gilbert Engineering Associate James C. Tate, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer |
| 08/06/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-086 Encanto Village 08/06/04 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: [C9-03-24 scheduled for M&C R-2 (rcp)] NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon/Broadway Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: August 09, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 8/3/04 The Purpose of the Residential Cluster Project (RCP) is to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered development by providing incentives to achieve community goals, such as historic and archaeological preservation, preservation of natural vegetation, barrier-free housing, development within low-income areas, and in-fill projects. Certain bonuses are allotted the developer who utilizes the RCP. They are greater density of units (with or without density bonus), reduced lot sizes, and reduced setbacks. In the Land Use Code (LUC) a density increase can applied if the subdivision meets certain criteria. These are designated as development alternatives “B” in table 3.2.3.1.F in the LUC. The tentative must identify that the subdivision is utilizing this option and provide the additional requirements with the submittal. The RCP using the density increase alternative “B” must meet at least one of the development categories listed in LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B. Please identify on the tentative which criteria will be utilized. When using RCP alternative “B” the common area has specific criteria that must be met. The area must be conveniently located and commonly owned, be a recreation facility, designed for, and usable by, both resident adults and children. Twenty-five (25) percent of the site area that is not part of the site coverage is to be commonly owned or set aside as accessible to all residents of the development for this purpose. (LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.2) Twenty-five (25) percent for this project would equal 6,216.5 square feet. Common area currently shown on the plat only equals 3,769 square feet and is designated as a detention basin and drainageway. These are not acceptable as recreation facilities and do not meet the intent as defined by the Land Use Code as currently shown. An area equal to eighty percent of lot 1 & 2 would be required to meet this requirement, with placement of playground equipment, barbecues, picnic tables, or other recreational equipment. Please be reminded that all facilities provided on site must also be handicapped accessible per ADA requirements, providing access constructed of all-weathered materials. Additional parking requirements are required when the RCP is designed utilizing development alternative “B”. These are listed in LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.F.2. Required parking that is located on the perimeter of the proposed subdivision is not allowed. These spaces need to be removed from the plat RCPs less than four (4) acres must be compatible in architectural design with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of those existing single-family attached or detached structures along the same block frontage and the block frontage across the street, and/or development on the opposite lot corners. Architectural compatibility will be in compliance with design criteria in applicable adopted neighborhood or area plans. (LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3) The site is within the Alvernon/Broadway Area Plan. Residential Policy 1 is to ensure that new residential development is sensitively designed to enhance existing land uses by compatibility of scale, density, and character with existing development. Details of design compatibility are outlined in the Plan’s General Design Guidelines. They include the following: Provide setbacks and transition of heights and/or densities for proposed development, which is adjacent to less intense uses, unless other mitigation measures provide adequate buffering. Design or locate balconies and windows to protect the privacy of adjacent residential development. Staff will also be reviewing for four-sided architecture that embraces those elements from the surrounding neighborhood, this includes color, finished materials, massing, and varying rooflines to add visual interest and character. Currently to the west the existing housing are one story in height. Those located in the R-2 portion adjacent to the proposed subdivision have a north-south orientation. Proposed two-story structures placed adjacent to this existing development have a similar density and should have a mitigated impact on current residents, since there are no direct openings facing the future subdivision. But in the R-1 portion, adjacent lots are single-story and have an east-west orientation that could be impacted by the development of two-story units. Due to this potential impact, Lots 8-9 are to be restricted to single story units. Residences to the east of the project are a mix of one and two story structures. Given the distance from proposed units to the property line and the mix of one-and-two –story units on the adjacent site, an adequate transition has been provided to meet Plan policy. Submission of photos will be required, taken of the surrounding area to assist staff in reviewing for architectural compliance and compatibility to surrounding neighborhoods. Please provide. On those lots that are less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. The following additional information will be required to be submitted: Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings. Plans can be reviewed in a more timely manner if copies of the building footprints drawn at the same scale as the plat are provided. This allows staff the ability to check which models fit which lots using a light table, instead of performing the tedious lot-by-lot math work. Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits. A list indicating which model homes fit which lots (if needed). Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. The list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., would still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. The tentative plat identifies access within the project as a PAAL. When access is provided to more than two lots the access is required to be designed as a street either public or private as shown on street cross-sections in DS 3-01.10.0 Figure 2. This would also require that sidewalk widths be a minimum of five (5) feet and provided on both sides of the street. Parking on both sides of the street is required as well. A DSMR will be required to remove these requirements, which would be supported by this Department. Please contact Development Services for process information. A public utility easement has not been identified on the tentative plat. Areas that allow the installation of electrical and telephone pedestals, water meters, etc. are not shown on the plan, which may cause interference with proposed landscaping. Please address. General note 15 indicates that the mechanical equipment will be screened and integrated into project. Please provide a detail of how screening is to occur or indicate that equipment will be ground mounted and screened by residences walls. Water harvesting techniques shall be utilized by conveying all roof runoff into landscape areas in the residential portion, prior to discharging in the retention area(s) per the Design Guidelines Manual. Lots that incorporate walls that abut amenity all common areas, should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot six (6) inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of the community” on these areas. All proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall also incorporate one of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of the above materials. |
| 08/10/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 12, 2005. 2. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-086. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 3. Add the following statement to general note 13: "This plat is designed to meet the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone criteria." (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7) 4. The tentative plat identifies access within the project as a PAAL. When access is provided to more than two lots the access is required to be designed as a street either public or private as shown on street cross-sections in DS 3-01.10.0 Figure 2. This would also require that sidewalk widths be a minimum of five (5) feet and provided on both sides of the street. Parking on both sides of the street is required as well. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.G) 5. Remove all "PAAL" references on the plat (i.e. cross sections, parking calculations, title block, lot setback requirements, and any other place on the plat). PAAL shall be referred to "street" see above comment number four (4). 6. All visitor parking spaces must be located within the RCP subdivision boundaries. Remove visitor parking spaces delineated on 4th Street. In addition, correct LUC Section 3.6.1.4.F.a and .b noted under the Density Bonus Compliance block. The section is labeled incorrectly. (LUC 3.6.1.4.F.2) 7. The RCP using the density increase alternative "B" must meet at least one of the development categories listed in LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B. Please identify on the tentative which criteria will be utilized. 5th Street is designated a "collector" street by the MS&R plan. Revise the reference to LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B.9 under the Density Bonus Compliance block on sheet 1 of 2 and revise 5th Street arterial designation on sheet 2 of 2. 8. When developed with a density increase, the RCP must provide for conveniently located commonly-owned recreation facilities, designed for, and usable by, both adults and children residing within the project. 25% of the site area that is not part of the site coverage is to be commonly owned or set aside as accessible to all residents of the development. Please revise tentative plat to provide and identify appropriate recreational open space(s) with amenities for all ages. Recreational amenities may include but not limited to ramada, tot lot, bbq grill, table/benches, and a passive exercise area. Appropriate open space recreational use area(s) are to provide amenities to all on-site residents. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.2) 9. Under general note 14 on sheet 1 of 2, indicate which units will be provided with barrier-free accessibility in conformance with Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.5 of the LUC. The tentative plat should reflect how accessibility will be accomplished. Barrier-free access, as applied under this criterion, is access from a street and/or parking space to the front door of a unit. (D.S. 2-10.301.D) 10. Add the following general note: "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council." (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.10) 11. Under the Density Calculation block on sheet 1 of 2 please correct the number of lots allowed in RCP-6 from 8.02 lots/acre to 20 lots/acre. 12. Under the Lot Setback Requirements for a street perimeter yard listed on sheet 1 of 2, revise the street perimeter yard setback listed to reflect all setback distances listed in Table 3.2.6-I for ADT of 140 or less. The building setback, which provides the greatest distance from the street shall be provided. Distances are based on the following, "five (5) feet measured from back of curb, or ½ height of exterior building wall measured from back of curb, or one (1) foot measured from the property line or nearest edge of the sidewalk." 13. Submit drawings, photographs, or a combination of both, showing how the architectural compatibility requirements of Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.3 of the LUC will be met. 14. On those lots that are less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. The following additional information will be required to be submitted: 1. Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings. Plans can be reviewed in a more timely manner if copies of the building footprints drawn at the same scale as the plat are provided. This allows staff the ability to check which models fit which lots using a light table, instead of performing the tedious lot-by-lot math work. 2. Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits. 3. A list indicating which model homes fit which lots (if needed). Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. The list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., would still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. 15. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. (D.S. 2-10.3.2.E) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/10/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | no objections/adverse comments |
| 08/10/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 9, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-086 Encanto Village: Tentative Plat CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/10/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | To: City Planning From: Kay Marks, Addressing Official Subject: S04-086 Encanto Village/Tentative Plat Date: 7/16/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Correct scale on Location Map. 2.) Delete Block numbers on pg. 2. 3.) Spell out Boulevard of Richey Blvd. On pg. 2. 4.) Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. |
| 08/10/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments |
| 08/10/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | August 9, 2004 TO: Lou Catallini, P.E., Baker & Associates THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Encanto Village, Lots 1-10 and Common Areas A & B - Submittal S04-086 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater TreatmentFacility via the South Rillito West (South Line) Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on a historical evaluation of the project area, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, S04-086, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Delete General Note 9. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 10 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 08/12/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no objections. |
| 08/12/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.” 2. 5th Street is a Collector roadway, not an arterial roadway as listed on sheet 2. 3. Provide the existing ROW width, recordation data, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) If 5th street is at the ultimate ROW, label it as BOTH existing and future. 4. Common area "A" is not a PAAL as identified on the plans. It is a street. It may be dedicated as a private street. Change all references to PAAL in the plan set. Correct General note 3 on sheet 1 to reflect the total milage of new private street. 5. Show no parking signs where applicable in sections 1/1, 2/1. 6. This is a new street that is being created. As such, parking is required on both sides of the street OR no parking on either side of the street with common parking provided elsewhere. (DS 3-01.2.4.D) A DSMR will be required and will be supported by this division to eliminate the parking from one side of the street. 7. Label intersection curb returns. 18' minimum at new private street/4th St., 25' minimum at new private street/5th St. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) |
| 08/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |