Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-083
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/16/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/21/2004 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Bach Property Lots 1-20 S04-083 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated September 3, 2004. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 09/26/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 7, 2005. 2. Previous comment will be removed and the tentative plat approved once documentation required is submitted to the Zoning Review Section. Previous comment: Per City rezoning maps, the subject property is subject to two (2) previous rezoning cases. Case numbers are C9-70-60 (refers you to case C9-64-61) and C9-77-23. For information regarding these cases please contact the Rezoning Section at 791-5550. You may need to search the microfiche files to obtain a copy of the rezoning conditions for these cases. If conditions do apply, please list the case number/s in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans, note the conditions on the plat, and submit a copy of the conditions with the resubmittal of this plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming as a result of the rezoning conditions. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/27/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Plan to designate plants within the Rose Hill Wash Study area as preserved in place. 2) Revise the native plant inventory list clarify the duplication of #28. 3) Revise the landscape plan/development plan to provide screening for parking areas per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. At the perimeter of the RCP Parking lots are to be screened from adjacent residential property with a 5' high masonry wall. Revise all plans as necessary. 4) Remove the note stating that "No landscape borders are required-RCP Project" on sheet L1. Landscape borders may be required along streets and adjacent to common areas on RCP projects. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 09/28/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/29/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/01/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Section B/1 calls out this private drive as ROW. Is this common area or ROW? If this is ROW (as annotated) then my comment from the first submittal is still valid. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/01/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approv-Cond | DATE: October 1, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-083 Bach Property: Tentative Plat Resubmittal CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Tentative Plat is conditionally approved provided final plat shows a dedicated public trail easement a minimum of 20 ft wide measured from the top of bank of Rosehill Wash and running the length of the subject parcel. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/06/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-083 Bach Property 10/05/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia - Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: September 29, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 09/22/2004 Department of Urban Planning and Design Bach Property Comments – S04-083 – 2nd submital Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan and Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. 1. The plans encourage the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. In order to provide such a microclimate, please provide a minimum of one fifteen (15) gallon tree, no more than ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk, on at least every other lot frontage. 2. The plans state that detention/retention basins or open areas should be used as active or passive recreational amenities. Please locate amenities such as; shade trees, picnic tables, benches, barbecues, tot lots, etc. in or around the detention/retention areas. Please show these amenities on the appropriate landscape plan pages. Please make these recreational amenities handicapped accessible by an all-weather path. 3. Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or a combination of the above materials. Please show a detail of the walls on the appropriate sheets. |
| 10/07/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 7, 2004 TO: James King Rick Engineering Company THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Bach Property, Lots 1-20 and Common Areas A1-A4 & B1-B3 Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S04-083 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET 1. Add the following General Notes THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. SHEET 2. There is a proposed manhole 1 shown on Sahuara Avenue. Please delete this proposed manhole from the layout. SHEET 2. Create a 20-foot wide public sewer easement BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT from the northwest property line to the Sahuara Avenue right-of-way. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 10/07/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |