Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-083
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/09/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-083 BACH PROPERTY/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 7/09/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: Change 17-63 to 13-91 on Location Map. 2.) Label approved interior street names. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 07/09/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. The following General Note must be provided on the plan: "On street parking shall be prohibited on both sides and signs shall be installed so indicating." 2. Revise Street Section "A" to indicate no-parking signs on each side of the street. |
| 07/12/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | No known landfills within 1000' of this development. No turn around for lots 4&5 for the service vehicles. To be curbside service off public right of way. |
| 07/21/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan plan sheet 2 to identify what is "existing to remain". 2) Provide a plant habitat and mitigation plan for any development proposed within 50' of the banks of the Rose Hill Wash. TCC Sec. 29, Article VIII |
| 07/22/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 21, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-083 Bach Property T131436 (110-16) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove shading and rip-rap symbols. Add interior bearings and add dimensions and bearings to Common Area “A”’s. Add complete curve data. Move the term “Basis of Bearing” over the bearing N 00-00-00 E instead of over the bearing N 85-00-30 E. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 08/03/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 3, 2004 TO: James King, Rick Engineering Company THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Bach Property, Lots 1-20 and Common Areas A1-A4 & B1-B3 - Submittal S04-083 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on historical data, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-083, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 2. The tentative plat shows the construction of a fill slope approximately 5 feet high and 12 feet wide over approximately 300' of existing 36-inch public sewer line that crosses this property, the Pantano Interceptor. Pima County Wastewater Management Department’s sewer maintenance vehicles cannot travel on such side slopes, and the fillslope would bury two manholes in this line. Adequate vehicular access must be maintained/provided to all manholes in the existing 36-inch line during the development of this property. The adequacy of the existing 16-foot public sewer easement over this existing 36-inch is also in question. Please set up a meeting between Bob Decker (740-6625) PCWWM Planning Services, Eric Wieduwilt (326-4333) PCWWM Field Operations or one of his representatives and myself to discuss methods of addressing these issues before re-submitting. I can usually accommodate their schedule, so please contact them first. SHEET 2. Show all the manholes along the existing sewer line G-72-17. While the manhole information is included, please include the manholes on the layout. SHEET 2. What are rectangles shown over the existing public sewer line in Sahuara Avenue? (These rectangles are shown in many other areas as well.) If these rectangles are not necessary, please delete them. SHEET 2. The required slope for 8-inch diameter pipe is 0.44 percent, except in terminal reaches where it shall be no less than 1.0 percent. Please revise the sewer design (slope and invert elevations) to accommodate a 0.44 percent slope at non-terminal reaches. SHEET 2. Why have some paved areas been shaded and others have not? Please explain all shading in the legend on Sheet 1. SHEETS 1 & 2. A public sewer easement has been shown in the shaded area between Lot 6 and Lots 4 & 5. This shaded area was designated as a common area in the plan view, but as a public right of way in Keynote 5 and Cross Section A. Revise as necessary and then reevaluate the need for the public sewer easement. SHEET 2. Please label manhole 8 to be watertight. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Eric Wieduwilt, PCWWM Field Engineering |
| 08/04/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments/objections |
| 08/05/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: August 5, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 2660 N. Sahuara Ave., Bach Property Development Plan S04-083 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 36 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Statement. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 5. Please address the drainage between lots 15 and 16. Perhaps a drainage easement, channel or scuppers are warranted here. 6. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 7. Complete Tentative plat (S04-083) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 8. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 9. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 10. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 11. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 12. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. The DS was reviewed for TP purposes only. 3. The minimum erosion hazard setback for the Pantano Wash on a curved section is 870', not the 350' for a straight section as stated in the DS. Please address. 4. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage Statement. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/2660 N. Sahuara Ave. CDRC |
| 08/05/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing locations of no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 figure 20) 2. The provided section A/1 is not wide enough for parking on either side of the road. Show no parking signs in the section on the left side as well as is depicted on the right side. 3. The roadway as extended to the southern end of the project (terminating in front of lot 5) appears to be longer than 600' as measured from Sahuara Avenue. Increase the entrance drive to 32' (vice 24') of pavement until fully within the development (ie, where the entrance drive intersects the interior street) (DS 3-01.6.2.B.4) D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/05/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 7, 2005. 2. Show the City limits on the location map. (D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.4) 3. Since this subdivision is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), a statement to that effect should be included in the title block. (D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2) 4. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-083. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 5. Per City rezoning maps, the subject property is subject to two (2) previous rezoning cases. Case numbers are C9-70-60 (refers you to case C9-64-61) and C9-77-23. For information regarding these cases please contact the Rezoning Section at 791-5550. You may need to search the microfiche files to obtain a copy of the rezoning conditions for these cases. If conditions do apply, please list the case number/s in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans, note the conditions on the plat, and submit a copy of the conditions with the resubmittal of this plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming as a result of the rezoning conditions. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1) 6. The northeast corner of the site is zoned R-3. Revise the existing zoning under general note two (2) to include both R-1 and R-3 zones. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2) 7. Dimension the width of the standard parking spaces in the common parking areas. Minimum 8.5 feet width required. (LUC 3.3.7-I) 8. Dimension the radii of the back-spurs. Minimum three (3) foot radii required. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.D) 9. It appears there is an easement located through lots 3 through 5 and a significant portion of lot 20, which may inhibit the location of a dwelling on these lots. If an easement is to be recorded or abandoned by final plat, please so state. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.J) 10. Indicate how barrier-free accessibility is to be provided by adding a detail to the plat showing the accessibility. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5) (D.S. 2-10.3.1.D) 11. Length of parallel parking spaces in CA "A-1" must be 23 feet in length for a total of 46 feet. Detail only shows 44 feet in length. 12. Under the site coverage calculation on sheet 1 of 2, streets are labeled as 20 foot wide and the cross section provided indicates a 24 foot width. Revise calculation as required. 13. Provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner lot, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard and street yard setback. These typicals are to be fully dimensioned and are to be drawn at a larger scale than the tentative plat. (D.S. 2-10.3.1.B) 14. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. (D.S. 2-10.3.2.E) (L.U.C. 3.6.1.5) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/05/2004 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Approved | no comments / objections |
| 08/05/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | no comments / objections |
| 08/06/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: August 6, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-083 Bach Property: Tentative Plat CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Indicate a 20 ft wide, developable, public non-motorized trail corridor is to be dedicated along Rose Hill Wash for a future trail connection to the Pantano Riverpark. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | From: Castillo, Liza > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:53 AM > To: 'Craig Gross'; 'Ferne Rodriguez' > Subject: Bach Property, S04-083 > > SUBJECT: Bach Property > Lots 1-20 > S04-083 > > Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated > July 6, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. > There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the > development. The facilities along with the easement recording information > must be shown on the plat prior to approval. > > A copy of the plat with the approximate location of the existing > facilities is enclosed. There is an existing service from unit #9 south > of the project, a request must be submitted for its removal. All > relocation costs will be billable to the developer. > > TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative > Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. > Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building > plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. > Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8479. > > > Liza Castillo > Land Management > Tucson Electric Power Company > lcastillo@tep.com > Office: (520) 917-8479 > Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 > Fax: (520) 917-8400 > |
| 08/09/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-083 Bach Property 08/06/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia - Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: August 04, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 07/29/2004 Department of Urban Planning and Design Bach Property Comments – S04-083 The tentative plat has 20 lots, 18 of which are smaller than the required minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet. On the application, the applicant stated that the tentative plat is not a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), which would allow for the lots to be smaller than 7,000 square feet. Please correct the tentative plat to show the lots as a minimum of 7,000 square feet or designate the tentative plat as a RCP. Staff will be able to review the tentative plat after the correction. |
| 08/09/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/09/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no objection. |