Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL- OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-075
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL- OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/14/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a native plant preservation plan and incorporate any required native plants into the landscape plans. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 09/17/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-075 6TH & DREXEL SUBDIVISION/ REVISED MINOR SUBDIVISION DATE: September 14, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: RECORDED DEEDS WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO SPLIT PROPERTY. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 09/17/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The majority of the previous comments have not been adequately addressed. Engineering Division requests that a meeting be arranged with myself and the owner/applicant and engineer of record. |
| 10/01/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/04/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | no comments |
| 10/05/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-075 6th and Drexel Subdivision, Lots 1-6 and Common Area "A" Final Plat TRANSMITTAL: October 5, 2004 DUE DATE: September 27, 2004 COMMENTS: The following comments were not addressed. A response letter stating how all Zoning were addressed was not provided with the submittal package. Submit a response letter with the revised plat and additional drawings requested. 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before July 9, 2005. 2. Address and revise the following items on the location map. a. Label correctly the section corners adjacent to sections 1 and 12. b. It is preferable that the location map be drawn without the delineation of the lots. The lot lines make it hard to read any information that may be relevant on the map. The map should be a line drawing depicting the major streets and the streets on where the parcel is located. c. Please label following streets, Nebraska Street, 12th Avenue, and Southern Pacific Rail Road. d. All recorded subdivision plats within the location map must be labeled by book and page numbers, i.e. 39/45 etc. 3. If CC&R's are proposed for this development please submit a copy with the next submittal of the final plat packet. Clarify who will be responsible for the maintenance of the detention basin. DS 2-03.6.6 4. Please add an additional sheet depicting the proposed development (overall site plan), which includes building locations, building setbacks for each lot, and parking spaces. The additional sheet should include the following: a. Building setbacks based on the lot locations, i.e. corner lot, interior lot, street perimeter and adjacent zoning. b. Visitor parking is to be provided for this development at a ratio of .25 cars per unit, which equals 1.5 spaces or two on street parking spaces. The parking spaces must be within 150 feet of the all lots. On street parking is not allowed on major streets. Both Drexel Road and Sixth Avenue are on the Major Streets and Routes map. On street parking may be allowed on Missiondale Road but verification from the Traffic Engineering Division must be provided. If the on street parking cannot be provided as required, one additional vehicle parking space must be provided on site. The parking spaces must be accessible to visitors for that dwelling unit. Approval through a CDRC development standard modification request will be required. c. The lots must be designed in a manner that provides for complete on site vehicular maneuverability into and out of the parking spaces. The vehicles are not allowed to back up onto a major street. Please demonstrate on the plat that the three vehicle parking spaces have sufficient vehicular use area on site to maneuver into and out of the parking spaces without backing out onto the streets. d. The lot detail drawing must be revised to demonstrate how the three parking spaces are to be provided on site. e. The detail drawing must demonstrate that the street building setback is from the back of future curb location. The minimum major street building setback is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure. f. This development is subject to the development criteria of the Major Streets and Routes Setback and the development criteria of the Airport Environs Zone. The plan must demonstrate how the AEZ criteria have been met. Both the mean sea level elevation for the northwest runway must be listed (M.S.L. for NW Runway = 2,583') and the MSL at the site plus the height of the proposed buildings. The heights must not exceed 216 feet for lots 4, 5, and 6 and 220 feet for lots 1, 2, and 3 above the M.S.L. of the northwest runway. See LUC section 2.8.5.7 for more information on the airport environs zone. 5. The following information is for other items that must be addressed on the plan. a. Seven keynotes have been added to the plat. The keynotes do not appear to be noted anywhere on the plat. Please clarify if the keynotes are typos or label the locations with the respective keynotes or remove if not applicable to this project. b. Add a general note to state that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of the MS&R and AEZ overlay zones. c. Correct the date typo on general note 4. d. The lot typical detail drawings must be drawn with the driveways. The detail drawings should be drawn with the actual design of the subdivision. e. Please insure that all drawing sheets match. The lot layout and the parking spaces and driveway locations must be consistent through out all of the plan sheets. Please revise as required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S04075fp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat and additional requested documents |
| 10/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 12, 2004 TO: Rene Pina, P.E. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: 6th & Drexel Subdivision - Submittal S04-075 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Utility Plan (UP): The City of Tucson will not allow the private sewer line to enter the Drexel Road right of way at an angle to reach the public sewer manhole. To avoid the need to construct a new manhole over the public sewer line in Drexel Road, revise the Utility Plan to show: Lots 1-3 discharging to the public sewer line in Drexel Road via a single, shared 4" House Connection Sewer (HCS) line that is perpendicular to the right of way. Lots 4-6 discharging to the public sewer line in Drexel Road via a second, shared 4" House Connection Sewer (HCS) line that is perpendicular to the right of way. UP: Sewer Notes 7, 8 (the second Sewer Note 8), 10, 11 & 12 do not appear to be necessary for this project. Delete all unnecessary sewer notes. Final Plat (FP): Show that the 15' public utility and private sewer easement on Lots 1-3 will be created by final plat. Also, move the label for this easement, so that it is not partially obscured by the line depicting the subdivision boundary. FP: Show that the private sewer easement on the west side of Lots 4-6 is 10 feet wide (i.e.: change 10 to 10'). FP: The 10' public utility easement on the east side of Lots 4-6 does not need to be a private sewer easement as well. Revise the label for this easement appropriately. As we do not see the Mylars for projects within the City of Tucson, we will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. But as these are the types of changes that are typically allowed to be shown on the Mylars, we will expedite the review of the next re-submittal and no wastewater review fees will be charged for this review. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 10/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |