Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-070
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/22/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-070 CORONA ROAD ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 3/22/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Tucson-Nogales Hwy to Nogales Hy on Location Map. Change 13-26 to 31-26 and 4-40 to 58-43 on Location Map. Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Map. |
| 04/02/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-070 Corona Road Estates, Lots 1 - 20 and Common Areas "A" and "B" Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 04/02/05 DUE DATE: March 31, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Add to general 3 on sheet one for the subject to section, ". H " after the Subject to section number 3.5.7.1.E, .F, .G. 3. For consistency with the Land Use Code requirements, keynote four under building setbacks on sheet 2, must be revised to state the correct building setback for the interior street building setbacks. The correct setback is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the nearest edge of travel lane. It is acknowledged that a 6-foot wide easement is proposed behind the property line and that no structure may be constructed over the easement other than a walkway or the driveway. The setback for the garage or carport setback has been listed correctly. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S03070tpca.doc |
| 04/07/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Additional note required on the landscape plan to clarify that landscaping will be installed in the common areas. Plans depict plants outside of common areas in conflict with COT requirements and note 13 on the landscape plan. |
| 04/08/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | >>> Dale Kelch 4/6/2005 3:41:49 PM >>> Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. The symbol used for new street signs is not correct in accordance with Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition. 2. Rotate the symbol at the eastern PRC 180 degrees. 3. Modify the note concerning no parking sign installation. These signs shall be installed by the Developer/Owner. City forces ARE NOT responsible for sign installation. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/22/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Corona Road Estates 2nd Submittal Tentative Plat Engineering Review LOCATION: T15S R13E Section 13 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-070 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, landscape documents, revised Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report and title report paperwork were received by Engineering on March 17, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.8: Provide copy of drainage report which states that the new El Vado Wash channel is designed to fully contain the 100-year flows. Response letter states that a copy of the report would be attached in this submittal, however Appendix D is missing. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5: The proposed basin outlets to the south by a weir and by bleeder pipe. Correspondence will be required when any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional documentation may be needed of that approval (from TDOT) and submitted with the drainage report.) 3) DS Sec.10-02 page 8.06: Table 8.1: Revise worksheets for scuppers and roadway capacities to reflect a roadway Manning's coefficient of .020 for the maximum value for asphalt when cars are present, per this section of the standards. Revise Tentative Plat accordingly. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 4) DS Sec.10-02 page 8.06: Table 8.1: Revise Tentative Plat according to revised worksheets for scuppers and roadway capacities with a roadway Manning's coefficient of .020. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: For detail A on sheet 3/3, street section shall reflect geotechnical recommendations or 2.5" AC over 4" base course, per the Pattison-Evanoff report page 11. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: 6) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Delineate basin access and show that no proposed vegetation will block access. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit copy of the response letter, the revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report and revised Landscape Plan. You may call to schedule an appointment to go over these comments, or if you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 04/27/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |