Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-070
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/28/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/29/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | The Tentative Plat is approved, June 29,2004, with the understanding that the fire hydrant locations indicated on the plan are not a part of this approval. We will determine the fire hydrant locations when water master plans are submitted. |
| 07/01/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-070 CORONA ROAD ESTATES/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: JUNE 30, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Bk. 4, Pg. 41 to Bk. 4, Pg. 40 in all locations (sheets 1 and 2). What address is being used on the excluded parcel? jg |
| 07/01/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-070 CORONA ROAD ESTATES |
| 07/08/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the landscape plan to provide mitigation plantings for Prosopis velutina per the native plant preservation plan. LUC Table 3.8.I Revise the preservation plan aerial photo such that all plant locations are readily determinable. Locations for #4 and #9 could not be determined. DS 2-15.0 3) Revise the landscape plan to identify and show the location of the preserved tree. |
| 07/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: CORONA ROAD ESTATES Lots 1-20 S04-070 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated June 24, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along Corona Road proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 07/12/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | No known landfills within 1000' of this subdivision. Curb side pick up off public R/W. |
| 07/14/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 14, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-070 Corona Road Estates T151313 (138-20) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the bearings for the lot lines and add the dimensions and bearings for the street centerlines. Add the complete curve data. If possible, add the tie to a section ¼ corner. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 07/14/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | |
| 07/19/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 19, 2004 TO: Greg Carlson, P.E., Greg Carlson Engineering THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Corona Road Estates, Lots 1-20 - Submittal S04-070 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, S04-070, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 07/20/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-070 Corona Road Estates 07/20/04 (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12TH Ave./Valencia Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: July 26, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (ü) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 7/12/04 |
| 07/26/2004 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Corona Road Estates 1st Submittal Tentative Plat Engineering Review LOCATION: T15S R13E Section 13 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-070 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, landscape documents, Drainage Report, and title report paperwork were received by Engineering on June 28, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-03.2.4.L.4: Elevation at channel bottom appears to be different on drainage report and El Vado Wash Project sheets. Explain discrepancy and/or provide discussion in Drainage Report explaining datum used for drainage exhibit and datum for El Vado Wash project. 2) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C: Show WSEL and floodplain limits for El Vado Wash channel on drainage exhibit. 3) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.8: Provide copy of drainage report which states that the new El Vado Wash channel is designed to fully contain the 100-year flows or show floodplain limits on exhibit plan view. 4) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5.A: Provide schedule for when the construction of the new El Vado Channel will be completed. State in drainage report whether the containment of the flows may be dependent on the completion of the south channel project. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5: The proposed basin outlets to the south by a weir and by bleeder pipe. Correspondence will be required when any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional documentation may be needed of that approval (from TDOT) and submitted with the drainage report.) 6) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3.B.1: Correct the Book / page on watershed map (Bk4 pg40). 7) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: On exhibit, show location of access to the basin. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: On location map, identify San Fernando Avenue on sheet 1. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: On legend, clarify the following: a) Elevations shown on sheet 2 are not clearly depicted as either existing or proposed; clarify description / symbols of existing and proposed spot elevations used on the drawing on the plat; b) provide delineation for floodplain limits; c) provide delineation for water surface elevation. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Address the following survey data: a) Verify whether the elevations used in the channel and on site and for any FEMA WSEL's are based on the same datum. b) Clarify benchmark datum location. c) Show tie to permanent survey monuments or to the nearest section or quarter section corner. d) The proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments will be shown; all monuments found or set will be described at boundary corners. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.H: Other significant conditions on the site, such as structures, fences, walls, etc., are to be shown. These elements should be indicated and labeled to be removed or retained. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Power poles are indicated along Corona Road; show any poles to the east of the two poles indicated on sheet 2. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: Address the following grading related comments: a) Acknowledge that erosion protection for the channel and basin areas as well as scupper sizing shall be reviewed at Grading Plan review stage; b) Provide a typical lot grading detail; c) Provide section showing that the proposed retaining wall at west property line is setback from boundary to accommodate area for construction of the retaining wall footer and the minimum 2 foot perimeter setback; d) Provide geotechnical report. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Provide / address any setbacks per the geotechnical report recommendations and this section of Tucson Code IBC Chap.36 Sec.14.2&3: a) setbacks from basin ponding limits to proposed buildings; b) setback from west boundary for proposed retaining wall slope setback and construction of footer. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J: Show water surface contour elevations for the 100-year flood indicated on plan view. Provide WSEL at corners of south boundary near channel. The linear distance between water surface contour intervals should not exceed two hundred (200) feet. FEMA X-shaded floodplain limits are shown on plan view; label off-site Q100 in channel and actual floodplain limits. 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Label and enclose with a solid line for the basin to designate as a common area that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association. 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01. a) Show minimum 5' sidewalk on proposed street section detail; b) Provide handicap ramps; c) Extend sidewalks along Corona Road frontage. 18) DS Sec.2.4.K, -L.4, & IBC Chap. 36 Sec.13.1: Procedures for differential grading outlined in this section shall apply and the engineering justification must be submitted as well as subsequent notification responses for lots 4-9. Proposed pad grades for Lots 1-3 must meet differential grading of 2 feet above natural grade; show compliance on sheet 2. 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.G: Streets designed for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and by refuse collection vehicles. Explain where locations of no parking will be signed in proposed cul-de-sac. 20) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. 21) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5: Provide area for erosion protection for wall outlets along west side of project within project limits. If a drainage easement is needed for splash pads beyond the property boundary, verification is required when any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) 22) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Show on plan view SVT's at Corona Place and Corona Road. 23) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Clarify common area description information in title block to clarify use of any common area, such that any proposed drainage areas for the retention / detention basin has a letter designation. At a minimum, this will need to be done at Final Plat submittal. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit copy of the response letter, the revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report, and a soils report. You may call to schedule an appointment to go over these comments, or if you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/29/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 29, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-070 Corona Road Estates: Tentative Plat CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/29/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | NO COMMENTS/OBJECTIONS. |
| 07/30/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.” 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x180) SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) 3. Section A-A (sht 2) is required to have 32' of pavement. See DS 3-01.0 Figure 2. This allows for (2) 10' travel lanes, (2) 6' parking lanes and using the 2' wedge curb to make up the additional parking lane requirement. The ADT note referenced in the section should be 0-1000. Consultant should ensure they are using the most current development standard in regards to street section. 4. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing locations of no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 figure 20) D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/02/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-070 Corona Road Estates, Lots 1-20 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: August 2, 2004 DUE DATE: July 26, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is June 28, 2005. 2. Please insure that all text that is less than 12 point (.12) is adjusted to meet the minimum. DS 2-03.2.1.C 3. Draw and label the City of Tucson/Pima County jurisdictional limits on the location map. DS 2-03.2.1.D.4 4. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S04-070. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 5. Add to general note 3, the subject to section numbers applicable to this use and development designator. The section numbers are as follows, "Subject to sections 3.5.7.1.E.,.F, and .G. DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 6. Add the bearings to all lot lines. DS 2-03.2.4.A 7. The street must be designed for parking on both sides of the street. See the street cross-section detail drawings in DS 3-01 at the following internet address http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStd301.pdf for more information on the correct street cross section dimensions. Please depict on the plan the on street parking spaces. The spaces must be a minimum of 8 feet wide and 23 feet long. The new cross section calls for a minimum right-of-way width of 51 feet when wedge curbs and parking on both sides of the street is proposed. The cross section for half the roadway is as follows, 16 feet of roadway from the center line to the face of the wedge curb, a two-foot wedge curb, two feet minimum behind the curb to the sidewalk, a five-foot wide sidewalk, and 6 inches from the back of the sidewalk to the property line. The parking lane is to be eight-foot wide, which includes the two-foot wedge curb. Please revise the cross section and drawn and label the on street parking lane. Also on sheet two label the street as public. DS 2-03.2.4.F and .G 8. Please address the following items: Please add a matrix table that lists the development criteria information as follows. The development designator is "G", the lot size requirement is 7,000 sq. ft. or greater per lot, the lot coverage max is 70%, the number of units per lot is one, maximum building height is 25 feet, and the perimeter yard indicator is "AA". The matrix should list the above information as maximum, minimum, or allowed and the matrix must include the proposed info for all categories. List the number of on street visitor parking spaces required and the actual number of spaces provided. Draw and label on the plan the required perimeter boundary building setback of six feet or two thirds the height of the structure whichever is greater where adjacent to R-1 zoning. The building setbacks for structures adjacent to Corona Road is the greater of 21 feet or one and one half times the height of the structure or wall adjacent to the Corona Road property line. The interior street building setbacks are based on the greater of 21feet or the height of the structure from the nearest edge of travel lane for all structures except front loading garages. The building setback for a carport or garage is 18 feet minimum from the property line or 19 feet from the back of the side whichever is greater. Please add a typical detail drawing of a lot and corner lot that depicts the building setbacks. The building setbacks from interior property lines are based on the greater of six feet or two-thirds the height of the structure. This information should be added to sheet two. 9. This project is not to be developed as and RCP development and therefore is not required to have CC&R's but three of the lots will have drainageways or some form of drainage structure built over them and will require maintenance. Please clarify who will be responsible for the maintenance of the drainageways. Will it be the individual lot owner or will there be a homeowners association? If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04070tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 08/02/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |