Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-069
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/24/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved June 24, 2004. |
| 07/07/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading and to identify areas to remain natural. DS 2-07.2.2.B, DS 2-15.3.4.A 2) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plan to identify any paths through natural areas. Locate the paths outside of the required scenic route buffer area. LUC 2.8.2.4.A 3) Revise the native plant preservation plan to comply with note 3 on sheet 2 of the tentative plat. Viable and transplantable native plants are to be preserved or transplanted within the scenic corridor zone per LUC 2.8.2.6.A |
| 07/09/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-069 CASITAS DEL SOL ESTATES NORTH/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: July 6, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 48-099 is the wrong location on the Location Plan. Please correct. Label lot 20 on Project Overview. Page numbers do not match on Project Overview. Correct lot numbers on pg. 3. Correct lot numbers on Mission Circle pg. 4. Four new street names are needed for this project-adjacent to lots 21-31, 32-42, 51-56 and 1-20. Please submit a list of street names. jg |
| 07/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: CASITAS DEL SOL ESTATES NORTH Lots 1-66 S04-069 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated June 22, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. A copy of the plat with the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, paving and driveway placements. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 07/12/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Not within 1000 feet of any known landfill. Refuse collection will be by individual containers picked up at the curb. |
| 07/12/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 12, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-069 Casitas Del Sol Estates North T141334 (119-11) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Remove the shading. Add square footage for the blocks and common areas. Add interior bearings for the lot lines; add dimensions and bearings for the common areas. Add the complete curve data. The word “Quarter” in the section tie is misspelled. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 07/14/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 14, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Casitas Del Sol Estates North Tentative Plan S04-069 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. 1. This TP and DR are presented as though the improvements proposed for Casitas Del Sol Estates (CDSE) have been completed. Revise the DR and TP to provide for construction of required off-site street and drainage improvements in the event that the adjacent proposed project does not get completed. Provide a discussion to show that access, floodplain and drainage requirements will be met independent from the Casitas Del Sol Estates improvements. Drainage Report 2. For clarity, please use consistent designations for drainage areas, concentration points and structures throughout the DR and TP 3. Provide a discussion of the Floodplain Requirements for mapped floodplain. Provide existing (pre-CDSE and post-CDSE) and proposed (pre-CDSE and post-CDSE) water surface contours at intervals of 200 feet or less. Indicate that Floodplain Use Permits will be required for the road and site improvements and for home construction on the affected lots until a LOMR is approved. 4. Provide for positive drainage of the sediment traps as shown in Figure 3.7 of DS10-01.0. (Page 52 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual) 5. The DR and TP propose changing existing sheet flow to channelized flow between lots 10 and 11. A notarized letter from the affected property owner granting permission for this off-site drainage solution will be required. You might consider obtaining an easement from the neighboring property owner for constructing off-site drainage solutions that would address this. Tentative Plat: 6. Add a note to the TP stating that Block A and Lots 1, 2, 65 and 66 are subject to the floodplain ordinance until a LOMR is approved. (DS 2-03.2.2.C.2.b) 7. Show that the basin design meets the criteria of Development Standard (DS) 10-01.4.3. Provide varying side slopes and an undulating shape to the extent practicable. 8. 9. The minimum jog for local streets is 150 feet. Revise the TP to increase the offset to 150 feet or to eliminate the jog. (DS 3-01.6.3) 10. Clarify Detail U on sheet 6 to indicate that no cut or fill slope will be constructed nearer than 2 feet from the property line in accordance with IBC 2000 11. Label and describe the proposed disposition for the existing structures shown on the tentative plat. Include the locations of all WAPA structures and guy wires on the plan view. (DS 2-03.2.3.F) 12. Provide consistent lot numbering between plan view and details. Correct the index map on the cover sheet to refer to the correct sheets. 13. Provide Sight Visibility Triangles along Brasilia Drive and Belmopan Drive. (DS 3-01.5.0) 14. Revise the detail on Sheet 2 to indicate that the screen wall including its footing will be fully within the property. 15. Check details and references. Basin 3 references AE/8, which does not exist. Detail A/8 as called out in detail AC/8 is not provided. A Floodplain Use Permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required when the Grading Permit is issued. A geotechnical report will be required with the permits for the retaining walls and the basin walls. Submit a revised TP, and a revised DR. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 07/14/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-070 CORONA ROAD ESTATES |
| 07/14/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org S04-069 Casitas del Sol Estates North 7/8/2004 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Mission Rd (Irvington to Ajo) No 0 27,200 44,000 4 44,000 40,453 4 631 Route 23, 30 Minutes, 0 Miles Bike route with striped shoulder Irvington (Mission to I10) No 0 37,800 44,000 4 41,481 44,000 4 Route 23, 30 minutes, .25 miles Bike route with striped shoulder |
| 07/16/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 16, 2004 TO: Derek Roberts, Arcadis THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Casitas del Sol Estates North, Lots 1-66, Block A & B, Common Areas A-D - Submittal S04-069 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southwest Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, S04-069, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 4. Delete key note 4. SHEET 4. Revise sewer design to provide a one percent slope for S6. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 07/22/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-069 Casitas Del Sol Estates North, Lots 1-66, Blocks "A" & "B", and Common Areas "A", "B", and "C" Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: July 21, 2004 DUE DATE: July 20, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is June 23, 2005. 2. Please revise the brief legal description in the title block. The description listed is describing a location not a re-subdivision or subdivision of land. DS 2-03.2.1.G.3 3. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S04-069. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. Demonstrate that the on street visitor parking will be provided and will be useable. The narrow width of the lots limits the street area in front of the dwellings for visitor parking spaces, which are to be 23 feet in length. Demonstrate on the plan that the visitor parking spaces can be accommodated without encroaching onto the driveway or that the on street parking will not restrict the pickup of the refuse containers. DS 2-03.2.4.G 5. Please double check the coverage calculation related to the square footage for the house/garage and driveway. Per coverage note 3, the maximum individual lot coverage is to be 892 square feet. The total coverage for the 66 lots times 892 square feet equals 58,872 square feet. Yet under the site coverage notes the total lots coverage is listed as 173,069 square feet. Please clarify if the calculation includes other type of coverage that is not drawn or listed on the plan. Please revise or clarify as required. DS 2-10.3.1.C 6. Please draw a barrier free detail drawing that will most closely resemble the proposed development. This development does not appear the typical dwelling with a two-car garage. The proposed homes are two stories and have tandem parking. Please revise the detail drawing to accurately represent the actual method for barrier free accessibility. DS 2-10.3.1.D 7.Please revise the building setbacks under the "Lot Setback Requirements" text block as follows: DS 2-10.3.2.A a. This project does not have streets that are less than 140 ADT, therefore please remove all of note 1 under the "Lot Setback Requirements". b. Remove under note 2, the sentence "Or 1' (Measured From Property line) distance from front loading garage/carport." c. Note 3 must be revised to state that the building setbacks adjacent to C-1 and RV zoning are based on the height of the structure. Also this site is not adjacent to O-3 zoning. Please revise as required and remove the O-3 Zoning. Label the C-1 zoning classification adjacent to the north of the this development. d. Revise under the RCP data text block, note 2, the perimeter yard indicator from BB to CC. 8. On lots of four thousand (4,000) square feet or more, it will be assumed that the lot is of sufficient size to accommodate a dwelling unit; therefore, on projects with lots of this size, floor plans will not be required. However, on lots of less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, units have to be custom designed to fit onto these smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance with RCP requirements. Therefore, on projects that have lots less than four thousand (4,000) square feet in size, submit: a. Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings. Plans can be reviewed in a more timely manner if copies of the building footprints drawn at the same scale as the plat are provided. This allows staff the ability to check which models fit which lots using a light table, instead of performing the tedious lot-by-lot math work. b. Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits. c. A list indicating which model homes fit which lots. Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. The list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., would still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. Please submit the requested documents and drawings. DS 2-10.3.2.D 9. If available please provided copies of the CC&R's for review. DS 2-10.3.2.E and LUC 3.6.1.5 10. The following items must be addressed. a. Note 7 under the RCP data text block must be revised. Sidewalks are required on both sides of the street including adjacent to Block "A". Remove the annotation stating that the sidewalks will not be provided adjacent to block "A". b. Three of the Scenic Corridor Route notes listed on sheet two are not relevant at this time. The notes in question are 1, 6, and 13. This plan must be reviewed for scenic corridor compliance. A public meeting has not been held and therefore any of the colors or building materials listed on sheet two has not been approved. Please request labels for notification and pickup a copy of the LDO application. Please review the requirements of LUC 2.8.2 and incorporate into the tentative plat drawing. The tentative plat drawing cannot be approved until the Scenic Corridor Route has been approved. c. Draw the view corridors and add the view corridor calculation. Demonstrate on the plan that the view corridors have been provided. See LUC section 2.8.2.6 for more information of view corridors. d. Clarify if the symbol for the cross section AH/6 is placed in the correct location on sheet 4. It does not appear that the cross section depicts the portion of the roadway as drawn on the cross section. Revise as required. e. Please review the plan correct multiple typos throughout the plan. f. Clarify if this development is detached homes or for attached town homes. The lots seem very narrow and if this is to be a town home development additional requirements must be met. See LUC section 3.6.1.4.D.2.c.1-.5. Demonstrate if applicable how these requirements have been met. 11. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revised plan and response comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04069tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 07/22/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 21, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-069 Casitas Del Sol Estates North: Tentative Plat CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/23/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-069 Casitas Del Sol Estates North 07/23/04 ( x) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other (Final Plat) CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor COMMENTS DUE BY: July 20, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( x) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( x) Resubmittal Required: ( x) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( x) Landscape Plan ( x) Other: Color palette for houses REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: July 16, 2004 Department of Urban Planning and Design S04-069: Casitas Del Sol Estates North – First Submittal The General Plan, Santa Cruz Area Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual provide guidance for the proposed Residential Cluster Project. 1. The plans promote development that complements surrounding residential developments. Please place a note under “General Notes” that states that the lots along the northern edge, 21-31, and a portion of the eastern edge, 12-19, shall be one-story in height. 2. The plans promote connectivity and accessibility within developments. Please locate a five feet wide sidewalk around Block B. 3. The plans promote development that creates a microclimate along the sidewalks of the interior streets of subdivisions. Please locate, at minimum, one canopy tree on every other lot no more than 10 feet from the back of the sidewalk. The trees should be at minimum 15 gallons in size. 4. The plans promote connectivity and accessibility within developments. Please construct the trails that lead to recreation areas as handicapped accessible. Please show a detail for the pedestrian trails. 5. The landscape plan shows pedestrian trails that are not on the tentative plat. Please show all the pedestrian trails on the appropriate sheets of the tentative plat. 6. The plans call for enhanced landscape around recreational amenities. Please increase the landscape in common area ‘b’ and around the pedestrian trails throughout the development. This should include canopy trees. 7. The plans encourage detention/retention and other common areas to be also used as active/passive recreational facilities. Please locate an additional passive/active recreational facility within the development. This could include picnic tables and a barbecue. In addition, to make the tot lot area more functional, please locate picnic tables and a barbecue in the tot lot area. 8. Please show all locations of screen walls in the development. Please show a detail of the walls. Any required or proposed masonry screen wall should be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The screen walls should incorporate one of the following decorative materials: a) tile, b) stone, c) brick, d) textured brick/block, e) a coarse textured material such as stucco or plaster, or f) a combination of the above. 9. Lots that incorporate walls that abut amenity areas such as designated open space areas, common areas, and trail systems should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four feet, eight inches in height, except for pillars, with one foot six inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of the community” on these areas. 10. The Scenic Corridor Zone requires building or structure surfaces to have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. Please provide a color palette of the proposed color schemes for the houses. Also, the plans promote a diverse pattern of building colors within developments. Please state under “General Notes” that a specific color scheme will not be used on more than two lots in a row. |
| 07/26/2004 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | no comments provided by agency. |
| 07/26/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/26/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments/objections |
| 07/26/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Label far side SVT with key note 20 at intersection of Irvington Place and Belmopan Drive. 2. The symbol for stop sign on sheet 1 is not in accordance with SDPI SD 100. There are no signs of any sort shown on these plans, why include the symbol? D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |