Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-064
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/22/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-064 SIERRA PANTANO / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 02/24/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-064 Sierra Pantano 02/24/05 ( x ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor COMMENTS DUE BY: March 04, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( x ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( x ) Resubmittal Required: ( x ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other: REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 02/22/05 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Sierra Pantano - S04-064 - 3rd Submittal 1. Condition 13 states that all retention/detention areas shall be designed as usable passive and active open space. Please provide active open space amenities in the designated area between lots 25 and 26. This needs to include, at minimum, a child play area amenity. 2. Condition 14 states that passive recreational facilities shall be provided in the common area. Please provide passive recreational facilities in the Common Area B, between lots 16 and 17. This needs to include, at minimum, shade trees, ground vegetation, and a sitting area. 3. Lots that incorporate walls that abut amenity areas such as, designated open space areas and common areas need to meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot six (6) inches wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the "eyes of the community" on these areas. 4. Condition 20 states that any masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and incorporate decorative materials. Note what decorative materials will be used in the construction of the walls. 5. Condition 21 states that any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please demonstrate on the applicable sheets that the outer subdivision walls on all four sides will be varied and that trees/shrubs will be placed in the appropriate locations. |
| 02/28/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Sheets 3 & 4 of TP indicate improvements in scenic route buffer area. Improvements are limited to those listed in LUC 3.7.5.2.c. Revise the plans as necessary to include only permitted improvements. Items such as the retaining wall are not allowed improvements. If applicable, submit any documents referred to in the response letter that permit the improvements. No attachments were received. 2) Trees and shrubs required along Houghton Road may not be located as to conflict with the gas easement. LUC 3.7.2.6.b. Revise as necessary. Provide confirmation from the holder of the easement of acceptance of the landscape plantings. 3) PER LUC 3.7.5.2.E "Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length". Revise all plans to comply with this SCZ requirement. The use of retaining walls along the scenic route is limited by the above section. If applicable, submit any documents referred to in the response letter that permit the improvements. No attachments were received. 4) The project is subject to the provisions of the scenic corridor zone. An SCZ review and approval is required prior to approval of tentative plat. Resubmittal of all plans is required. |
| 03/04/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/07/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is June 7, 2005. 2. Tentative Plat may not be given approval until the SCZ plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/08/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: March 8, 2005 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Sierra Pantano, 10496 E. Escalante Road Tentative Plat S04-064 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 36 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat. The Tentative Plat (TP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Cuts or Fills located in the SCZ shall be no greater than 3:1 (h:v) per LUC Sec. 3.7.5.2.E, please revise. A variance will be required for the vertical walls greater than 3' in the Scenic Corridor Zone. Per previous comments, discussions and meeting. 3. Please contact PCDOT for information on construction in the Right-of-way for Escalante Road. Please contact Maggie Shaw or Robert Young at PCDOT for more information. Also please show any intersection widening for Escalante Road if applicable. Please provide documentation from Pima County and from the COT indicating that none of the intersection improvements and/or widening will not be required. 4. The future right-of-way for Escalante Road is 150'. Dedication will be required. Please contact Maggie Shaw or Robert Young at PCDOT for more information. Please provide documentation from Pima County that it is not requiring the dedication of the additional ROW on Escalante Road. Will any or all sections and plan views remain the same or will the ROW dedications need to be eliminated? 5. Please show compliance with zoning condition numbers 3. Per previous comment. Rezoning condition requirements: · No. 3: Provide documentation the $190,000 for the permanent improvements along the East half of Houghton Road was placed in escrow prior to the TP approval. Please verify with and provide documentation from Vincent Catalano of TDOT at 791-5100. Drainage Report: 1. The DR was reviewed for TP purposes only. The final acceptance is at the Grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Sierra Pantano CDRC 3 |
| 03/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/08/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 8, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-064 Sierra Pantano: Resubmittal(2/18/05) Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Approved. |