Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-064
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/01/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-064 SIERRA PANTANO / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Change Camino Escalante Del Pantano to Camino Ensenada Del Pantano on pgs. 3,4 & 8. |
| 10/01/2004 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: SIERRA PANTANO Lots 1-42, Common Area "A" & "B" S04-064 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated September 21, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along Houghton Road and Escalante Road proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. As you are aware, there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk, and paving. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 10/02/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is June 7, 2005. 2. In the upper left hand corner of sheet 2 of 8, revise title from "Zoning Conditions" to "Rezoning Conditions". 3. SCZ response comment acknowledged. SCZ case number SCZ-04-10 shall be labeled in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. Tentative Plat may not be given approval until the SCZ plan has been approved. Since a Board of Adjustment Variance has been applied for, please list the following as a general note: Variance case number, date of approval , variance/s granted, and conditions imposed. HDZ response comment acknowledged. The previous request has not been addressed: Notes that must be added to the tentative plat include: 1) All proposed site work, including grading must comply with Development Standard 9-04.0. 2) Exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, except satellite dishes, must be earthtone in color and will blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot. Satellite dishes may be black. White is not permitted. 3) Building height is limited to 24 feet within the HDZ. (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04) 4. If an easement is to be recorded or abandoned by final plat or it is to be recorded or abandoned by separate instrument, please so state on the plat. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.J) 5. A total of 11 lots are to be barrier free accessible. 25% of 42 lots is 10.5, which must be rounded to 11. Revise RCP note eight (8) as required. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5) (D.S. 2-10.3.1.D) 6. Response to free standing sign comment is acknowledged, previous comment stands. Previous comment: Provide a detail of proposed free standing signage. In addition, indicate the proposed location/s of the signs. (Rezoning condition 17) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/05/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-064 Sierra Pantano 10/05/04 ( x ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor COMMENTS DUE BY: October 6, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( x ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( x ) Resubmittal Required: ( x ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( x ) Other: Color building elevations & colored sign details REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 09/30/04 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Sierra Pantano - S04-064 - 2nd Submittal 1. Condition 10 states that pedestrian systems within the development shall be conveniently connected to adjacent pedestrian systems. In addition, the applicable policies promote connectivity to adjacent developments. Please connect the sidewalk along Escalante Road to the path along Houghton Road. 2. Condition 13 states that all retention/detention areas shall be designed as usable passive and active open space. Please provide usable passive and active open space amenities in all the retention/detention areas. This can include canopy tree areas with picnic tables, barbecue grills, tot lots, etc. 3. Condition 14 states that passive recreational facilities shall be provided in the common areas. Applicable policies state that recreational amenities should be centrally located. Please provide the required passive recreational amenities. This can include canopy tree areas with picnic tables, barbecue grills, etc. Please locate at least one recreational amenity in a central location. 4. Condition 15 states that buildings and landscaping shall be designed to be architecturally consistent with the surrounding area. Please submit the required dimensioned elevation drawings, which condition 15 states should be in color. 5. Condition 17 states that freestanding signs shall be integrated into the overall landscape plan. Please show a color detail of the proposed signs and how they will be integrated within the surrounding landscaped area. 6. Condition 20 states that any masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and incorporate decorative materials. Note what materials the wall will be constructed with and how the wall will be graffiti-resistant on the details. 7. Condition 21 states that any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please show the wall variations and trees/shrubs on the applicable sheets. |
| 10/05/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) SHEETS 3 & 4 OF TP INDICATE IMPROVEMENTS IN SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA. IMPROVEMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THOSE LISTED IN LUC 3.7.5.2.C REVISE THE PLANS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ONLY PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS. ITEMS SUCH AS THE RETAINING WALL AND HANDRAIL ARE NOT ALLOWED IMPROVEMENTS. CLARIFY WHAT IS INTENDED IN THE BUFFER AREA IN FRONT OF COMMON AREA B, THE PLAT SHOWS AN UNIDENTIFIED "HATCHING". 2) REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO IDENTIFY THE EXISTING EASEMENTS IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE TENTATIVE PLAT. EASMENTS TO BE VACATED OR ABANDONED SHOULD BE LABELED AS SUCH. 3) HDZ SITE IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS APPLY TO THIS SITE. REVISE THE PLANS TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR COMPLYING WITH THE VEGETATION/REVEGETATION AND SLOPE STABILIZATION STANDARDS OF DS 9-04.3. ADD NOTES AS NECESSARY TO CLARIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS. LUC 2.8.1.3.B, LUC 2.8.1.8. 4) REVISE THE LEGEND ON THE TENTATIVE PLAT TO USE THE TERM NUOS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. DS 2-03.2.4.I 5) PER LUC 3.7.5.2.E "Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length." REVISE ALL PLANS TO COMPLY WITH THIS SCZ REQUIREMENT. THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS ALONG THE SCENIC ROUTE IS LIMITED BY THE ABOVE SECTION. 6) REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO CLARIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANT COVER/DUST CONTROL PROVISIONS OF LUC 3.7.2.7. 7) REVISE THE PLANS TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR DUST CONTROL IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA ADJACENT TO ESCALANTE ROAD. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 8) REVISE THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANS TO CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS FOR DESERT HACKBERRY AND REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO LIST THE CORRECT QUANTITY. 9) REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO LIST THE CORECT NUMBER OF TRANSPLANTS. 10) ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE TO THE LANDSCAPE PLANS: "All exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, retaining walls, and accessory structures, except satellite dishes, shall be earth tone in color and will blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot or parcel. Satellite dishes may be black. White is not permitted." LUC 2.8.1.8.C THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE. AN SCZ REVIEW AND APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PLAT. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 10/08/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. The symbol used for the no parking signs in the cul-de-sacs is incorrect. These will be NEW signs. The symbol depicted is for existing signs. See SDPI, SD100. 2. Orient the above mentioned symbols to face oncoming traffic. 3. On sheets 3 and 8, there are call outs for 2 existing signs on Houghton to be relocated as they will fall in the proposed turn lane. There are 2 existing signs on Escalante that appear to lie withing the proposed turn lane that are not so annotated. Traffic Engineering is in receipt of the submitted TIA for this project as required by rezoning conditions. Traffic Engineering APPROVES the TIA. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/08/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: October 8, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Sierra Pantano, 10496 E. Escalante Road Tentative Plat S04-064 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 36 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat. The Tentative Plat (TP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Please see comment no. 5. 3. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Cuts or Fills located in the SCZ shall be no greater than 3:1 (h:v) per LUC Sec. 3.7.5.2.E, please revise. As per your response, this comment may be eliminated when the results of the variance process have been received. 4. Please contact PCDOT for information on construction in the Right-of-way for Escalante Road. Please contact Maggie Shaw or Robert Young at PCDOT for more information. Also please show any intersection widening for Escalante Road if applicable. Please provide documentation from Pima County and from the COT indicating that none of the intersection improvements and/or widening will not be required. 5. The future right-of-way for Escalante Road is 150'. Dedication will be required. Please contact Maggie Shaw or Robert Young at PCDOT for more information. Please provide documentation from Pima County that it is not requiring the dedication of the additional ROW on Escalante Road. Will any or all sections and plan views remain the same or will the ROW dedications need to be eliminated? 6. Please show compliance with zoning condition numbers 3, 8 and 22. Per previous comment. Rezoning condition requirements: · No. 3: Provide documentation the $190,000 for the permanent improvements along the East half of Houghton Road was placed in escrow prior to the TP approval. Please verify with and provide documentation from Vincent Catalano of TDOT at 791-5100. · No. 8: Contribution of the $25,000 in assurances will be allowed at the Final plat stage. · No. 22: An archaeological assessment and survey must be performed before any grading or modifications take place. Please submit the assessment prior the TP approval to ensure the amount or possibly where the cut and fill the project is proposing will be allowed. Drainage Report: 1. The DR was reviewed for TP purposes only. The final acceptance is at the Grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Sierra Pantano CDRC 2 |
| 10/08/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: October 8, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-064 Sierra Pantano: Tentative Plat Resubmittal CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Houghton Greenway: Locate paved path adjacent to landscape buffer. Include a cross-section of the paved path. Plant more trees along west side of paved path. Trees should be spaced irregularly at 20 ft -30 ft apart(25 ft average spacing). Trees should be minimum 3 ft from path. Plant more shrubs along west side of path. Density should be about 2x what is shown. Install irrigation to landscaping in greenway. Maintain 2 ft clear area along sides of path. Indicate slope of paved path meets ADA requirements. If City requires bollards, use 1 removable bollard(vesus 2 bollards) in center of path where path meets roadways. Drainage channels crossing the paved path shall be directed under the path. Traffic medians in roadways must not extend into line of greenway path where it crosses roadways. Curb ramps where path meets roadway should be 10' to 12' wide. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/18/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | October 18, 2004 TO: Peggy Rau EEC THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Sierra Pantano, Lots 1-42 and Common Areas A & B Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S04-064 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET 4. Remove the public sewer easement that is being created BY THIS PLAT between lots 17 and 18. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 10/19/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |