Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S04-064
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S04-064
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/08/2004 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/08/2004 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved June 08, 2004.
06/10/2004 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S04-064 SIERRA PANTANO/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 6/09/2004



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:


1.) Delete all street directions on Location Map.

2.) Change 40/25 to 40/27 on Location Map.

3.) Add See Sheet 3 and See Sheet 4 to pgs. 3 and 4.
06/14/2004 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved Individual lots fronting on public R/W. Ok for curb side pick-up.
06/22/2004 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Craig Gross DATE: June 22, 2004
Planning Administrator
SUBJECT: Sierra Pantano, 10496 E. Escalante Road
Tentative Plat S04-064 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 36

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report.

The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Tentative Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
4. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Cuts or Fills located in the SCZ shall be no greater than 3:1 (h:v) per LUC Sec. 3.7.5.2.E, please revise.
6. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
7. SRP's are not allowed in the right-of-way. Contact Permits and codes at 791-5100 for more information.
8. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP.
9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
10. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.
11. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Please call out NVAD 88 with the elevation on the plans.
12. Please consult the new street cross sections per D.S. 3-01.0 to allow for on-site street parking. See zoning condition no. 4. Please revise.
13. Show Subdivision number (S04-064) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
14. Please move the lot lines shown the on retaining wall details to include the entire wall within the property.
15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way of Houghton Road. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
16. Please contact PCDOT for information on construction in the Right-of-way for Escalante Road. Please contact Maggie Shaw or Robert Young at PCDOT for more information. Also please show any intersection widening for Escalante Road if applicable.
17. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
19. Explain curb and pavement in section detail N/6.
20. Grading and Stormwater pollution prevention plans are required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information.
21. The future right-of-way for Escalante Road is 150'. Dedication will be required. Please contact Maggie Shaw or Robert Young at PCDOT for more information.
22. Please show compliance with zoning condition numbers 3, 8 and 22.
23. Please include the soils report with the next submittal.
24. Label lots A or B per detail on sheet
25. Call out all hatch designations.

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. The DR was reviewed for TP purposes only. The final acceptance is at the Grading plan stage.
3. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. This comment pertains to the trail and scuppers that will be required Houghton Road.
4. Show the main project address on the cover of the drainage report.
5. Provide calculations for compliance of an all-weather access at the subdivision entry.
6. Provide calculations for WSEL at grate inlet on Street "B".
7. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
06/25/2004 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) DISTURBANCE IN EXCESS OF THAT SHOWN ON PDP AND IN REZONING APPLICATION MATERIALS IS INDICATED ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY. PRELIMINARY PLANS INDICATED THAT ONLY 20' OF THE 60' WIDE DESERT BUFFER WOULD REQUIRE DISTURBANCE. REVISE AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
C9-03-17

2) SHEET 5&6 OF TP INDICATE IMPROVEMENTS IN SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA. IMPROVEMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THOSE LISTED IN LUC 3.7.5.2.C
REVISE THE PLANS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ONLY PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS.

3) HDZ SITE IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS APPLY TO THIS SITE. REVISE THE PLANS TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR COMPLYING WITH THE VEGETATION/REVEGETATION AND SLOPE STABILIZATION STANDARDS. DS 9-06.3

4) CLARIFY WHICH NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION METHODOLOGY IS EMPLOYED ON SHEET 1 ON THE PLAN. LUC 3.8.6.1


5) IDENTIFY ANY NUOS AREAS ON TENTATIVE AND FINAL PLATS. DS 2-03.2.4.I

6) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDES REFERENCES TO INTRODUCED PLANTINGS IN THE SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER. NO DISTURBANCE IS ALLOWED WITHIN THESE AREAS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED. PROVIDE PLANTING/IRRIGATION PLANS. LUC 3.7.5.2.A

7) IRRIGATION PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO INCLUDE: irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation.


8) PER LUC 3.7.5.2.E "Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3)
foot length." REVISE ALL PLANS TO COMPLY WITH THIS SCZ REQUIREMENT. THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS
ALONG THE SCENIC ROUTE IS LIMITED BY THE ABOVE SECTION.

9) REVISE THE NPP TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR SITE PRESERVATION FENCING. DS 2-15.6.0

10) THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANS INDICATE REMOVAL OF PROTECTED PLANTS WITHIN THE AREAS TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY ALONG ESCALANTE ROAD. REVISE THE PLANS TO PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION WHERE POSSIBLE.


RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED.
07/01/2004 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

RICK LYONS
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: June 30, 2004


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S04-064 Sierra Pantano T141536 (136-32)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Remove all hatching and shading.
Add bearings to the lot lines and dimensions and bearings to the street centerlines.
Add the complete curve data.
Add the Map and Plat to the adjacent subdivisions.
Add the bearing and distance from the NW ¼ corner to the point of tie to the subdivision.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.





Susan King
07/01/2004 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: SIERRA PANTANO
Lots 1-42, Common Area "A" & "B"
S04-064

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated June 4, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval.

A copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk, and paving.



Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tep.com
Office: (520) 917-8479
Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668
Fax: (520) 917-8400
07/06/2004 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S04-064 Sierra Pantano 07/02/04

(x) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(x) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-17

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor

COMMENTS DUE BY: July 5, 2004

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(x) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(x) Resubmittal Required:
(x) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(x) Landscape Plan
(x) Other: Building elevations

REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 06/25/04

Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments
Sierra Pantano – S04-064

1. Condition 10 states that pedestrian systems within the development shall be conveniently connected to adjacent pedestrian systems. In addition, the applicable policies promote connectivity to adjacent developments. Please construct a sidewalk along Escalante Road per City of Tucson standards.

2. Condition 11 states that a typical detail for street trees on residential access streets shall be provided. Please provide the required detail.

3. Condition 13 states that all retention/detention areas shall be designed as usable passive and active open space. Please provide usable passive and active open space amenities in all the retention/detention areas. This can include canopy tree areas with picnic tables, barbecue grills, tot lots, etc.

4. Condition 14 states that passive recreational facilities shall be provided in the common areas. Please provide the required passive recreational facilities. This can include canopy tree areas with picnic tables, barbecue grills, etc.

5. Condition 15 states that buildings and landscaping shall be designed to be architecturally consistent with the surrounding area. Submit the required dimensioned elevation drawings and color photographs of surrounding properties.

6. Condition 17 states that free-standing signs shall be integrated into the overall landscape plan. Submit the required details of the proposed signs.

7. Condition 20 states that any masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and incorporate decorative materials. Note what materials the wall will be constructed with and how the wall will be graffiti-resistant on the details.

8. Condition 21 states that any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please show the wall variations and trees/shrubs on the applicable sheets.
07/06/2004 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is June 7, 2005.

2. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-064. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1)

3. Revise general note one (1) and first sentence of RCP note one (1) to the following. "Existing zoning is SR. Proposed zoning is R-1."

4. This project is within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) and Hillside Development Zone (HDZ).

A separate review is required for the SCZ. The case number for this review must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape and NPPO plans. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc..) as shown on the approved SCZ plan must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. A thirty-foot-wide buffer area, adjacent to the future MS & R right-of-way, is to be preserved in place and maintained in its natural state. Maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future-right-of-way, not to exceed 24 feet in height. Material and/or paint description for areas of structures and signage visible from the Scenic Route are reviewed for colors, which are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earthtones. The SCZ process requires that the applicant offer to meet with the adjacent property owners and neighborhood associations. For more specific information on this process, please contact our office. (LUC 2.8.2)

The HDZ review is done along with the review of the tentative plat. The ACS calculations must be reviewed and verified by the City Engineer. Refer to Land Use Code Sec. 2.8.1 for development criteria that needs to be submitted. Notes that must be added to the tentative plat include: 1) All proposed site work, including grading must comply with Development Standard 9-04.0. 2) Exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, except satellite dishes, must be earthtone in color and will blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot. Satellite dishes may be black. White is not permitted. 3) Building height is limited to 24 feet within the HDZ.
(LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04)

5. Label and dimension on-street parking lanes in applicable street cross sections. Per rezoning condition number four (4), all new streets within the development shall be designed to accommodate parking on both sides of the street. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.G)

6. All existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plat, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. If an easement is to be recorded or abandoned by final plat, please so state. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.J)

7. Barrier-free accessibility must be provided to twenty-five percent of the ground floor units and all common areas within the project. Indicate how this accessibility is to be provided, and add a detail to the plat showing the accessibility. In addition, label those units, which are proposed for barrier free accessibility on the plat. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5) (D.S. 2-10.3.1.D)

8. Add the following RCP note: "All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP" and demonstrate the type of screening proposed. (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9)

9. Revise general note 16 with the following: "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council." (LUC 3.6.1.4.A.10)

10. On sheets 3 of 7 and 4 of 7, revise zoning classification for the adjacent property to the east of the subject property from RX-1 to SR. In addition, remove reference to 20' PYS along the east subdivision boundary. The correct perimeter yard setback adjacent to SR zoning is 25 feet.

11. Revise the Escalante Road perimeter yard setback call out on sheets 3 of 7 and 4 of 7 to the following: "21' or the height, whichever is greater, measured from back of future curb."

12. Typical "B" lot detail on sheet 2 of 7 includes the SCZ buffer within the lot boundaries and the cover sheet indicates the SCZ buffer is in common area "A". Revise for consistency.

13. Re-check the site coverage calculation. The total area does not add up correctly. (D.S. 2-10.3.1.C)

14. Provide a detail of proposed free standing signage. In addition, indicate the proposed location/s of the signs. (Rezoning condition 17)

15. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. (Rezoning condition 16)


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
07/07/2004 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Passed
07/07/2004 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied July 6, 2004

TO: Peggy Rau, Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc.

THRU:


FROM: ____________________________________
representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality

SUBJECT: Sierra Pantano, Lots 1-42 and Common Areas A and B
- Submittal
S04-064


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the both the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano and South Rillito Interceptors and the Tucson Boulevard Flow Control Facilty. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available, and provide a copy of that letter to this office. PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at 520-740-6500.
Please note: The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.

Based on the sewer layout shown, this project would qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of a sewer service agreement.

All Sheets: Add the tentative plat case number, S04-064, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision.

Sheet 2: Provide a flow-through sewer to serve the unsubdivided property to the east (APN 136-32-0080). The terminal manhole must be located within 10' of the property line, and the flow-through sewer line must be located within an appropriately wide public sewer easement. The easement must be located entirely on one lot if possible, and a stabilized surface must be created within the easement for adequate vehicular access to the terminal manhole.

Sheet 2: New Manhole #1 should be relocated into the paved portion of the street.

Sheet 2: New Manhole #1 is 20' deep. The proposed sewer easement that crosses Common Areas A and B must therefore be 40' wide near New Manhole #1, but it may taper down to 20' wide where it crosses the subdivision boundary.

Sheet 2: The boundaries of the proposed sewer easement must connect to the boundaries of the existing public sewer easement to the south.

Sheet 2: Show that the proposed sewer easement will be created BY THIS PLAT.

Sheet 2: Show the recording information for the existing public sewer easement to the south, and show it as an easement, not as a separate parcel.

Sheet 2: Show the required stabilized surface within both of the public sewer easements within the plan views and in a cross section detail.

We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature.

Copy: Project
07/07/2004 CRAIG GROSS OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
07/09/2004 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: July 08, 2004

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-064 Sierra Pantano: TP

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


The Houghton Greenway as shown does not conform to the City/County divided urban pathway standard(see attached cross-section):

Indicate a minimum 6 ft wide landscape buffer on the west and east sides of the paved path.

Trail should meander.

Paved path may be relatively straight.


Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
07/09/2004 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.:

1. Add a general note to read "All non-signalized intersection street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways."

2. Label the SVTs as to size at the intersection of Escalante Road and the entrance to the Development.

3. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC (DS 3-01 figure 21). So indicate by showing no parking signs on the plans.

4. SVTs shown on sheet 4 are not identified by keynote.

5. Section bubbles on sheet 7 incorrectly identify several of the sections as being on sheet 6.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
07/13/2004 CRAIG GROSS COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved no comments/objections
07/13/2004 CRAIG GROSS CDRC STAFF TRACKING Completed