Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-053
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/11/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-053 RIO NUEVO MERCADO DISTRICT / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: MAY 11, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Add Road to St. Mays on the Location Map. 2: Add Resubdivision information to all Title Blocks. 3: Change lots 1 through 98 to 1 through 104 on all Title Blocks. 4: Delete “Menlo Park Bk 10, Pg 95 Project Layout. 5: Change “Menlo Park Bk 3, Pg 113” to Menlo Park Annex & South Menlo Park Bk 3, Pg 131 on Project Layout. 6: Please provide Spanish approval for Avenida Del Convento. 7: Delete Landers Drive on Pg 2. This is not an official street name. 8: Add Commercial Pad “E” on Pg 3. 9: Spell out Grande Ave on Pg 4. |
| 05/11/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Minimum width of Fire apparatus access roadway is 20 feet, paved, unobstructed. Street Sections "A", "B", "C", "D"and "E" shall be modified to indicate so. 2. Existing Landers Apartments drive complies with Fire Code requirements for access drives. We will not accept reduced pavement widths for access to the existing apartments. 3. Dead-end fire access roadways shall be provided with approved turnarounds. 4. Minimum 18' and 32' turn radii required at several street intersections contact Jim Egan at 791-3234 for locations. |
| 05/24/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: RIO NUEVO MERCADO DISTRICT Lots 1-98 S04-053 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated May 6, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. A copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. TEP's approval of the tentative plat is necessary if you request a preliminary electrical design prior to the signed Approved Tentative Plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, sidewalk and paving. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8479. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 05/25/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org S04-053 Rio Nuevo Mercado District 5/21/2004 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Congress (Silverbell to I-10) No 0 17,200 43,000 4 43,000 42,133 4 6,988 Route 29, 30 minutes, 0 miles None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 05/28/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Within 1,000 feet of Nearmont and Rio Nuevo South (Congress) Landfills. Self-Certification Notification Statement required. |
| 05/28/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-053 Rio Nuevo Mercado District 5/28/04 (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (ü) Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: Rio Nuevo Mercado District PAD NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: none COMMENTS DUE BY: June 7, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) Resubmittal Required: (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 5/28/04 Review for the tentative plat at this time cannot be completed until the PAD submittal has been accepted and reviewed. Once the PAD document is accepted any review prepared for CDRC review, using the PAD document, comments made run the risk of being incomplete until actual approval by Mayor and Council. A first review can not be accomplished without criteria to review the tentative plat with. Most, if not all comments made on the PAD review are probably the same comments that would be made for the tentative plat. Be assured that this department, and reviewer will provide a review in a timely manner on the second submittal. |
| 06/02/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: June 2, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-053 Rio Nuevo Mercado District T141314 (116-20) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the dimensions and bearings for the perimeter on all sheets. Add bearings for the lot lines. Add the square footage for the common area. Add the tie to the section corner. Remove shading and stippling. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 06/07/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-053 Rio Nuevo Mercado District Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: June 7, 2004 DUE DATE: June 7, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 10, 2005. 2. This plan could not be reviewed at this time. It is not possible to review the submitted plan for compliance until such time as the PAD document has not been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04053tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 06/07/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 03, 2004 TO: David Little, P.E., The WLB Group, Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Rio Nuevo Mercado District, Lots 1-104, Commercial Pads A-E and Common Area A - Submittal S04-053 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Northwest Outfall. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available, and provide a copy of that letter to this office. PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at 520-740-6500. The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Based on our records for Rio Nuevo, Blocks 1-15 and Common Areas A-C under subdivision plat case number, S02-003, the bulk of this project would qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate. However, more must be known about how the southern portion of the project will be sewered. All Sheets: Add the tentative plat case number, S04-053, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. All Sheets: Add cross reference number, S02-003, to the title block of each sheet. Sheet 1: Combine General Notes 10 and 13 into a single general note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. Sheet 2: Show the plan number for the existing public sewer line in the Congress Street right of way. Sheets 2-6: The alleys must be a minimum of 20' if they are to be utilized as public sewer and utility easements. Sheets 2-5: Show the sewer design data, on the sheets where the sewer lines have been shown. Sheet 4: Show the size and the plan number of the existing public sewer to which you are proposing to connect. Also show the manhole number of the existing public sewer manhole to which you are proposing to connect. Note: The Pima County Wastewater Management Department's section and base maps do not show any existing public sewer lines in this area. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $250.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 06/07/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide verification in writing of City Engineer approval to locate required native plant mitigation and relocated plants in the public right-of-way. 2) Required mitigation and locations for native plant preservation is to be determined at this time, the preservation plan cannot be approved until compliance with the requirements is demonstrated. Mitigation is to be provided on-site or in the adjacent public right-of-way as may be approved by the City Engineer. LUC 3.8.4.2, LUC 3.8.6.2.C 3) Plantings proposed in the public right-of-way are required to be selected from the ADWR plant list. LUC 3.7.2.2, MUNICIPAL CONSERVATION PROGRAM, THIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN, TUCSON ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA 4) The proposed 30' temporary landscape buffer adjacent to Clearwater Dr. is located offsite. Relocated native plants are to be located on site. See comment #2. 5) Revise the irrigation plan to include the source of irrigation water, whether potable or reclaimed. DS 2-07.5.4.A.1 6) Revise the plans to include canopy trees to shade parking areas. LUC 3.7.2.3 |
| 06/08/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 7, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-053 Rio Nuevo Mercado District: TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 06/08/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No Objections. |
| 06/09/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | no comments. |
| 06/09/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.: 1. Stem side length on SVTs is 20' 2. On sheet 2of6, the section through Congress St reads 2/4, it should read 2/5. 3. On sheet 3of6, the section through Street "B" reads 3/4. There are no sections on sheet 4. 4. On sheet 4of6, the section through Clearwater Drive reads 5/4, it should read 5/5. 5. On sheet 1, general note 30, the note should read "A traffic impact analysis was prepared..." D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/14/2004 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Rio Nuevo Mercado Tentative Plat Submittal Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R13E Section 14 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-053 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, PAD Report, Landscape Plan, Site Analysis, Drainage Report, and title report paperwork were received by Engineering on December 29, 2003. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for PAD and Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-03.2.4.L.1: Discuss and provide data in drainage report for the potential for ponding at water harvest areas and stormdrain inlets. Show locations on drainage exhibit. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.4: On drainage exhibit, provide more general spot elevations in areas of Plazas, commercial pads, project perimeter areas, and storm drains to indicate flow for proposed drainage in these areas. Provide size, type, and invert elevations for stormdrain pipe. 3) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: Discuss in Drainage Report areas of Water Harvesting. 4) DS Sec.3-01.4.4.D: Provide assessment for all weather access. Include cross sections and spot elevations for streets showing depths (not to exceed 1-foot deep), velocities, and flow rates. 5) Tucson Code Sec.29.22.D: For Tentative Plat approval, it is necessary to provide certification that the landfill to the south will not adversely effect neighboring property. Per this section of code, the developer of the property which is within 1,000 feet of a designated landfill may file with the director of development services center a certified statement that, after full and appropriate investigation and analysis, the designated landfill does not currently, nor can reasonably be expected in the future to, pose a health or safety risk to development of the property as a consequence of the generation and/or migration of methane gas or any other potentially dangerous substances from the designated landfill. The certified statement shall be signed by a professional who is licensed by the Arizona Board of Technical Registration and who is knowledgeable regarding landfills, methane gas and related health and safety issues. The certified statement may not be accepted for any property which is on or above a designated landfill. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 6) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-03.2.1.G.3: Provide brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision. Provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat for resubdivisions. Explain how blocks 3, 8, and 10 of the Amended Final Plat for Rio Nuevo meet General Note 7 on Bk57 pg40. 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.F: Since the project is located within the boundaries of Rio Nuevo Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the entire PAD District on the first sheet and indicate the location of the portion being developed. 8) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.J: Address the following PAD comments: a) Per the PAD, it is stated that surface and underground parking beneath each block of the Town Center is proposed. Show in the Tentative Plat how and where this is provided. b) It is stated on page 11 of the PAD Report that parking will be provided on both sides of the streets for the residential portion of the site. Revise section detail 7 for Street "A" to comply with PAD and development standards. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: For detail on page 41 of the PAD Report, clarify whether the utility companies have accepted close proximity of proposed utility pedestal locations for the proposed utility niches. 10) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a & Sec.2-03.2.4.K, Sec.10-02.14.2.6, Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Sheet 1 states that the Soils Report was submitted with this submittal per general note 29. It does not appear to be in the Attachment to the Menlo Park Mercado District PAD Report Item 8 of the Site Analysis. Please submit a separate bound report of the geotechnical evaluation for this project. The geotechnical report shall address the following items: a) existing geotechnical conditions b) suitability of the soils for this project c) assessment of gravel/borrow pit or any other manmade soil conditions onsite d) proposed recommendations for foundations and pavement design e) recommendations for proposed slope grades f) setback distance from proposed building foundations to edge of drainageways g) specifically address all criteria listed in section DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design h) boring data i) status of methane gas monitoring for landfill at south of the project as well as any percolation results and infiltration test location map j) any other typical geotechnical recommendations used to review the Tentative Plat 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I: Indicate the existing conditions on site and within 100 feet of the site. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the subdivision will be shown. Show extents of the landfill boundaries at the south side of the project on plan view on sheet 4. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide further clarification for proposed grades and ground elevations for reference to future grading and site drainage: a) Clarify discrepancy in high point spot elevation and manhole #2 rim elevation on sheet 2. b) Manholes and concentration points have similar keynote types. Clarify differences between manhole callouts and storm drain inlet locations on sheets 2 and 3 of the Tentative Plat. Clarify drainage direction at manhole #3. Provide details for the storm drain inlets with spot elevations on plan view. c) On sheets 2, 3, and 4 provide more spot elevations in areas of Plazas to indicate flow for proposed drainage in these areas. d) At west end of Landers Drive provide existing and proposed spot elevations to indicate proposed drainage design at this location. e) Provide proposed spot elevations to indicate proposed drainage design along Avenida Del Convento. f) Provide finished pad elevations for commercial pads. g) Provide other typical grading details to show minimum grades away from structures to accommodate flow around buildings. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: On sheets 2 and 3, show 100-year ponding limits on planview. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.6: The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of 100 cfs or more will be drawn on the plat. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.C: Increase font size descriptions in the Title Block. 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Reference any of the following special overlay zones that are applicable, and add a note stating that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: The following information regarding the existing public right-of-way for Grande Avenue and Congress Street will be provided: the names, MS&R right-of-way widths, recordation data, type and dimensioned widths of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Revise sheets 2 and 4. 18) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: There are common areas used for proposed alleys, sewer easement, plazas and existing storm drain easement. Clarify common area description information in title block to clarify use of the Common Areas. Assurance paperwork will need to match common area descriptions on the plat. At a minimum, this will need to be done at Final Plat submittal. 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F: Label and identify the basis of elevation as described in General Note 7 on a plan view. 20) 21) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Provide dimensions and bearings for tie to property boundary from section 14. All monuments found or set will be described. 22) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: The proposed streets do not meet Development Standards for typical cross section and horizontal geometry. Address the following comments for the proposed street alignments "A", "D", "B", "C": a) horizontal geometry at intersections and street curves should meet minimum curb return radii per DS Sec.3-01.10.Figure 6; b) Parking lanes of 7 feet may only be used for ADT up to 1000; c) If any modification to DS Sec.3-01.10 for cross sections 3, 6, and 7 are proposed, and if Fire and Solid Waste (Environmental Services) accepts proposed reduced widths, submit Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR); d) Add a general note identifying by case number any modifications that are applicable to the project, including any DSMR together with the date and conditions of approval or, if the review has not been completed, a statement that it is in process. 23) DS Sec.6-01.4.1.I & 3.2.A: Address the following solid waste service comments: a) Only three solid waste service areas are proposed for the entire project; show how the lots and commercial sites will be accommodated by solid waste pick-up. b) Solid waste containers are to be placed so that the collection vehicle does not have to back into moving traffic, on or off the premises. Show maneuverability for safe pick-up at Street "C" and on Clearwater Drive. 24) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: A portion of the MS&R arterial Grande Avenue is where a signal is warranted on page 28 of the TIA and a roundabout is proposed. Although the plans state that the turnaround will be submitted under separate cover, this turnabout should be an integral part of the Tentative Plat review and approval. In response letter, provide status of this review. 25) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.2: Assure locations for parking stalls for proposed parking do not restrict the sight visibility within the corrected sight visibility triangles. On plan view, show associated setbacks for buildings on lots that are restricted by SVT's. 26) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: The minimum distance between curb cuts for residential driveways is 12 feet per Tucson Code Section 25.38(a). Clarify how lots will have access. 27) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Explain purpose of 3 foot setbacks on private alley detail 8 on sheet 5. 28) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: On plan view, label streets as public or private. Per page 1 of the Drainage Report, the proposed streets are public; clarify. If 16' Paseo is for non-motorized vehicle use only, depict bollards or other traffic control device at ends of the Paseo. 29) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and proposed status. Also, specifically address the following: a) include any existing easements as listed in Title Report; b) as it pertains to Bk57 pg40, show ingress/egress easement at Avenida Del Convento; c) show other sewer and utility easements and right-of-ways that fall within this project's boundaries as shown on Bk57 pg40; 30) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: Delineate and label 30' public storm drain easement per Bk57 pg40. 31) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 32) Tucson Code Sec.6-34.Chap.36.Sec.9: A Grading Plan and Permit will eventually be required. Grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated as "engineered grading". Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: 33) LUC 3.7.4: Show how water harvesting will be provided on Landscape Plan. 34) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.2: Assure correct SVT's are shown on Landscape Plan. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit the revised Tentative Plat, revised Landscape Plan, revised Drainage Report, and a bound copy of soils report. You may call to schedule an appointment to go over these comments, or if you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |