Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-052
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/04/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/05/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Minor Subdivision Review is approved May 05, 2004. |
| 05/05/2004 | JEGAN | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/06/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-052 SEARCY PLAZA/MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: MAY 5, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Location Map scale. Include resubdivision information on all Title Blocks. Spell out all streets suffixes except on Location Map. Label El Dorado Place on pg. 2. Label Block 1 on pg. 2. It appears that buildings on existing Development Plan BK 27, PG 12 may encroach on to lot lines. Please verify. jg |
| 05/07/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-052 THOMAS P. PANNO SEARCY PLAZA |
| 05/19/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-052 Searcy Plaza 05/18/04 (x) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-81-33 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: May 31, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (x) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 05/18/04 |
| 05/24/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Searcy Plaza S04-052 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the minor subdivision plat dated April 14, 2004. The Designer for this project is Mike Kaiser. He can be reached at (520) 918-8244. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 05/25/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | |
| 05/28/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit copies of any revised plans. Submit a copy of the approved landscape plan. |
| 06/01/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | No known landfills within 1000 ft. of this development. Dumpster enclosures require 10' clear distance between bollards. Side wall protection is required. No provisions for recycling. |
| 06/01/2004 | ANY | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Assurances (copy) to Laith on 4MAY04. |
| 06/01/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | 8 Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: June 1, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S04-052 Searcy Plaza T141506 ((133-14) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. __X____ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections. The title should read Lots 1-5 and Common Area “A”. There is no Block 1, since that is what has been divided up into lots and common area. Add the road information for Speedway Boulevard to sheet 2. Add names of adjacent subdivisions or add UNSUBDIVIDED. The paragraph dealing with survey monument on sheet 2 needs a monument with an arrow pointing at it. If there area any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 06/01/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 28, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-052 Searcy Plaza: Subdivision Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the tentative plat and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 06/03/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 06/04/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this minor subdivision. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/08/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-052 Searcy Plaza, Lots 1-5 and Common Area "A" Final Plat - Minor Subdivision Commercial Medical Offices TRANSMITTAL: June 7, 2004 DUE DATE: May 31, 2004 COMMENTS 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before May 4, 2005. 2. Reference on the location map all recorded subdivision plats by book and page number that fall within the one mile area. Also please reference Grant Road along the northwest corner of the location map. In addition, label the City of Tucson/Pima County jurisdiction limits. DS 2-03.6.1.D.2 3. Revise the title block to the following. Final Plat for Searcy Place, Lots 1-5 and Common Area "A". Remove the reference to block numbers. Also in the title block the reference to the re-subdivision of Lot 1 of El Dorado Place II of Maps and Plats at Book 41 page 52. Revise the title block as required. DS 2-03.6.1.H.1 - .3 This project should have three common area designations. A common area for the private street, one for the vehicle parking area and one for the landscape areas. Revise the plan as required and label the areas accordingly. List the common areas in the title block and add a general note stating what common area designation and square footage for each. The CC&R's must also include language about the different common areas and associated maintenance for each. DS 2-03.6.4.C 4. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S04-052. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets. DS 2-03.6.1.K 5. Please correct the typo in general note D (conditions instead of consitions). DS 2-03.6.1.D 6. Add the following as a general note. "Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public. DS 2-03.6.2.I 7. Add the following as a general note. "(I/We), the undersigned, do hereby hold harmless the City of Tucson, its successors and assigns, their employees, officers, and agents from any and all claims for damages related to the use of the property depicted on this plat now and in the future by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." Ds 2-03.6.3.b.3 8. Review the Approval data block and revise verbatim (correct typos) as stated in the development standards 2-03.6.3.D. Add the City of Tucson city clerks name and also the name of the party requesting this recordation. DS 2-03.6.3.D 9. Label the street name El Dorado Place - Private Drive as labeled on the development plan. The private drive must be reserved as a common area. DS 2-03.6.4.A Per the plat the existing private drive is to become a common area but does not provide for an ingress/egress easement over the existing private drive. Please clarify if the existing drive will not service the developments to the north of this project and if so the existing easement must be abandoned by separate instrument and the recordation (docket and page numbers) noted on the plat. 10. The underground detention tanks as shown on the plat do not match the location approved on the development plan. Revise the location of the tanks or if the location is accurate clarify if maintenance agreements by the owners will be drawn up in order to maintain the tanks or if they will be covered as part of the reciprocal maintenance agreement. The tanks cross over property and do not appear to be within common areas. DS 2-03.6.4.I 11. The distance and bearings for the site boundary do not match the distance and bearings on the final plat. Please clarify and if neccessary revise the plan accordingly If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S04052fp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat and CC&R's and additional requested documents |
| 06/10/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 1, 2004 TO: Thomas Panno, R.A., Thomas P. Panno, Architect THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Searcy Plaza, Lots 1-5 - Submittal S04-052 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to both the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano Interceptor and the Tucson Boulevard Flow Control Structure. Treatment and conveyance capacity was allocated for this project by the approval of the previous development of this area under case number, D02-0041, for the Offices for Fredrick J. Menick, MD development plan. Based on our records under previous case number, D02-0041, this project would qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate. All Sheets: Add the final plat case number, S04-052, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. All Sheets: Add development plan case number, D02-0041, to the title block of each sheet as a cross-reference number. Sheet 1: Private sewer easements will need to be created over the private sewer lines. Change PRIVATE STREETS, DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS in the Dedication to PRIVATE STREETS, PRIVATE EASEMENTS, DRAINAGEWAYS AND COMMON AREAS. Sheet 2: The private sewers will cross Common Area A and several of the lots. Show private sewer easements by final plat centered over the private sewer lines where they cross the lots, with enough survey data to both locate these easements, and identify their boundaries. Sheet 2: Label the private sewer easements with the words PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT BY THIS PLAT and their width. Sheet 2: The sewer easement created by Docket 5734, Page 683 is a public sewer easement. Add the word PUBLIC to the description where this sewer easement is referenced. Sheet 2: Part of existing the public sewer easement created by Docket 5734, Page 683 has been shown using the linetype shown the legend and part has not. Show all of this public sewer easement using the linetype shown in the legend, or better yet. Show all existing easements with the same type of dashed line, and use appropriate labels to identify them. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 06/10/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | RECORD LEGAL DESC | Needs Review |