Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL- OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-050
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL- OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/19/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: August 19, 2004 SUBJECT: Second engineering review of the Winstel Apartments Final Plat. The activity number is S04-050. SUMMARY: The Final Plat was received by Engineering on August 19, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received item and does not recommend approval of the Final Plat RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: FP SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: ASSURANCES The next submittal must address the following items: FINAL PLAT 1. Include the Assurance Package with the next Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a recent Title Report. (Previous review comment) 2. Include the Beneficiary Paragraph as specified in DS 2-03.6.3.C . (Previous review comment) 3. Seal the plans and remove the "preliminary" notations. . (Previous review comment) 4. The legend must show and describe all symbols and lines shown on the plat. The legend shows a linetype used for, "exist. center line". This line is used on the plat for street centerline and also existing easement centerline (?). Centerlines of easements are not required but may be included if properly identified. Distances and bearings of existing easements are not required (with recordation information provided, which it is). DS 2-03.6.1.L (Previous review comment) 5. Spell Bellevue correctly. (Previous review comment) 6. At least one corner of the subdivision must be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner, or an established City or County survey monument. The plat must include a description of the corner marker. Corner tie recordation information is to be provided on the plat. DS 2-03.6.5.A (Previous review comment) 7. All proposed easements must be shown in a surveyable manner with dimensions, bearings, or deflection angles and radii, arcs, and central angles of all curves. The plat shows two access easements connected by a common line. One access easement showing bearings and distances for all easement lines would be sufficient. In any case, provide a bearing and distance for all easement lines. There are easement lines on the plat missing bearings and/or distances. (Previous review commetn) 8. A north arrow and scale must be included on sheet 2. They were included on the first submittal, but dropped from this second submittal. DS 2-03.6.1.I TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: August 19, 2004 SUBJECT: Second engineering review of the Winstel Apartments Final Plat. The activity number is S04-050. SUMMARY: The Final Plat was received by Engineering on August 19, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received item and does not recommend approval of the Final Plat RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: FP SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: ASSURANCES The next submittal must address the following items: FINAL PLAT 1. Include the Assurance Package with the next Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a recent Title Report. (Previous review comment) 2. Include the Beneficiary Paragraph as specified in DS 2-03.6.3.C . (Previous review comment) 3. Seal the plans and remove the "preliminary" notations. . (Previous review comment) 4. The legend must show and describe all symbols and lines shown on the plat. The legend shows a linetype used for, "exist. center line". This line is used on the plat for street centerline and also existing easement centerline (?). Centerlines of easements are not required but may be included if properly identified. Distances and bearings of existing easements are not required (with recordation information provided, which it is). DS 2-03.6.1.L (Previous review comment) 5. Spell Bellevue correctly. (Previous review comment) 6. At least one corner of the subdivision must be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner, or an established City or County survey monument. The plat must include a description of the corner marker. Corner tie recordation information is to be provided on the plat. DS 2-03.6.5.A (Previous review comment) 7. All proposed easements must be shown in a surveyable manner with dimensions, bearings, or deflection angles and radii, arcs, and central angles of all curves. The plat shows two access easements connected by a common line. One access easement showing bearings and distances for all easement lines would be sufficient. In any case, provide a bearing and distance for all easement lines. There are easement lines on the plat missing bearings and/or distances. (Previous review commetn) 8. A north arrow and scale must be included on sheet 2. They were included on the first submittal, but dropped from this second submittal. DS 2-03.6.1.I |
| 08/19/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Lot Split is approved August 19, 2004. |
| 08/20/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Lot split approved with assurances that there will be an enclosure constructed for a 4 CY metal dumpsters on caster be constructed or an enclosure be constructed for a metal dumpster. Shared responsibility need to be in writing to ensure all understands the agreement of the service for the resubdivision of the properties. |
| 08/27/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-050 WINSTEL APARTMENTS/REVISED MINOR SUBDIVISION DATE: August 19, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Fairmount Avenue to Street on pg. 2. Change Bellvue Avenue to Bellevue Street on pg. 2. jg |
| 08/27/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | -----Original Message----- From: Castillo, Liza Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:20 AM To: 'Craig Gross' Cc: 'lmc.consulting@worldnet.att.net' Subject: WINSTEL APARTMENTS, S04-050 SUBJECT: WINSTEL APARTMENTS Lots 1-4 S04-050 The Final Plat for the subject project will meet this Company's easement requirements. Please forward any resubmittals of the final plat to this office. Electric service will be provided to this subdivision in accordance with the rules and regulations approved by the Arizona Corporation Commission. Please contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 08/31/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-050 Winstel Apartments: Lots 1 -4 Final Plat - Minor Subdivision Review TRANSMITTAL: August 31, 2004 DUE DATE: August 30, 2004 COMMENTS 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before May 18, 2005. 2. The minimum building setback required from interior lot lines is the greatest of 10 feet or three quarters the height of the structure. The building setbacks for buildings 4, 7, and 11 do not meet the minimum building setback of ten feet. The following setbacks must be approved through the lot development option process. (The building setbacks are to the new property lines.) a. The proposed building setback from building 4 and the north property line is seven feet. b. The proposed building setback from building 7 and the east property line is nine feet, eight inches. c. The proposed building setback from building 11 and the west property line is nine feet, 4 inches. In addition, please add to the plan a building setback from units two and three to the west property line. (Previous Comment: Please address the following items. It is not clear if the building setbacks have been met. Please draw the existing structures on the plan. Label the building setbacks from the new property lines to the buildings. If the building setbacks cannot be met, the new property lines must be reconfigured or a lot development option will be required for each affected setback.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S04050fp2.doc |
| 09/14/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/14/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/14/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | September 14, 2004 TO: Larry McGlone, Larry McGlone Consulting, Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Winstel Apartments - Submittal S04-050 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |