Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-047
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/11/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved June 11, 2004. |
| 06/14/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Previous comment #4: "The native plant preservation plan is to include improvements proposed within the tributaries of the airport wash and the inventory is to list protected plants located within disturbance areas. Areas where path improvements, landscaping and irrigation is proposed are considered disturbance areas. DS 2-15.3.4.A" Add appropriate notes to explain the impact to native plants. 2) Previous comment #7: "Sheet L10 includes a schedule for a block plat, please revise the plans to show where improvements associated with this schedule are to occur." It would appear that this information would be best suited for inclusion with the Block Plat submittal. 3) Previous comment #11: A study of the resource corridor is required per LUC 2.8.6.4.B for development or disturbance proposed within the floodplains of the airport wash and its tributaries. Preservation of one hundred (100) percent of critical riparian habitat areas within the resource corridors for parcels shown on the Environmental Resource Zone Overlay Maps (ERZ Maps) is required, except as provided in Sec. 2.8.6.4 and Sec. 2.8.6.6. RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED. SUBMITTAL INCLUDING AN ERZ APPLICATION IS REQUIRED TO MEET ERZ REQUIREMENTS. |
| 06/23/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is February 21, 2005. 2. Environmental Resource Report review is pending. If case number is issued, please note in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. 3. Note the recordation information of the proposed 10-foot wide public utility easement where applicable. If the easement is to be recorded by final plat, please so state. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 4. Remove "and demonstrate the type of screening proposed" from general note 23. What is meant is for you to demonstrate graphically or by note the type of screening proposed. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 5. There is a discrepancy in the square footage listed under general note 1 for villages 5 and 6 and the square footage listed under their respective density calculation on sheets 5 and 6. 6. Since there are no lots located immediately adjacent to County TH zoning and the Voyager Road setback note has been added and clarified, please delete the reference to TH zoning setback criteria noted under the perimeter yard setback information for each village on sheets 3 through 6. In addition, the setback requirement is not "10' or ¾ height". LUC 3.6.1.4.D/ LUC 3.2.6.4. "BB" 7. Revise CC&R's as follows: on the cover sheet please reference all subdivision information found in the title block located on each sheet of the final plat (i.e. subdivision name, number of lots, common areas, and RCP designation). The CC&R's must also detail any restrictions on any proposed natural areas. D.S. 2-10.3.2.E/ L.U.C. 3.6.1.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 06/24/2004 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Sycamore Park S04-047, T15S, R15E, SECTION 32 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on June 10, 2004 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: The Drainage Report is acceptable for Tentative Plat purposes and it is hereby approved. Tentative Plat: 1. The proposed Development does not appear to be tied to the basis of bearing. Either provide the tie to this Development or use a different basis of bearing (D.S. 2-03.2.3.B). 2. It appears that in order to comply with Rezoning Condition #14, Sycamore Park Development must install an interim pavement until the Voyager Park Development completes the design and the installation of the north part of the Pantano Roadway. 3. Show and label the proposed 10.62' landscape and sidewalk easement (shown in Detail 16/10), on sheets 29, 31 and 32 of the Tentative Plat. 4. Show the location of the sediment traps, on the plat, for all the proposed detention/retention basins. 5. Show low-flow channels in all the proposed detention/retention basins in compliance with Rezoning Condition #29. 6. It appears that the Detention/Retention Basins in Block 4 do not have maintenance access ramps. Ensure that all basins have ramps and they are all labeled. Please be advised that maintenance access ramps shall be designed in such a way that does not allow the public vehicular access (i.e. ramps may have removable post barricades or lockable gates at the entrance). Landscape Plan: The Landscape Plan is acceptable for Engineering and Floodplain purposes. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat |
| 06/24/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-047 Sycamore Park 6/24/04 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-01 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 6/23/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 5/19/04 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 6/23/04 |
| 07/01/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.: 1. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. Several of the no parking signs as depicted in this plan set do not meet this requirement. Specifically: sht 17/32, move sign from in front of lot 5 to lot line between 5/6 sht 27/32, move sign from in front of lot 55 to in front of lot 54(prefer lot line between 54/53) sht 29/32, move sign from in front of lot 11 to lot line between 11/10 sht 32/32, add sign to lot line between 37/38 D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/08/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | CDRC STAFF | TRACKING | Completed | |
| 07/08/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 8, 2004 TO: Warren Thompson, Stantec Consulting Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Sycamore Park, Villages 1-7 and Common Areas A-D - Submittal S04-047 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Label all proposed manholes as “NEW” and assign a number to them. SHEET 16. The easement on this sheet should be labeled PUBLIC UTILITY & PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT BY FINAL PLAT With the appropriate dimension next to it. Be advised that this easement may be required to be widen during the sewer improvement plan process, depending on what type of utilities share this easement. SHEETS 15 & 17. The manhole next to Lot 3 on Sheet 15 does not require a watertight lid, however the manhole next to Lot 3 on Sheet 17 does require a watertight lid. Please revise accordingly. SHEETS 25, 28, 29 & 32. Please label the easements as PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT BY FINAL PLAT These easements shall include pointing arrows defining the easement limits and also include the dimension in feet. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |