Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-046
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/22/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/26/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | A minimum 20 ft. wide, paved, fire apparatus access roadway must be provided and extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of all structures. An approved turnaround must be provided for dead-end access roadways. |
| 04/27/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: April 26, 2004 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the 5115 E. Lee Street Final Plat. The activity number is S04-046. SUMMARY: The submittal was received by Engineering on April , 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received item and does not recommend approval. SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: FINAL PLAT, SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE STATEMENT, ASSURANCES, CC&Rs, BOUNDARY CLOSURE CALCULATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Final Plat purposes only. 2. Include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a recent Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section 13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: 1. The submitted plan and associated documents are for a lot split. However, this is a minor subdivision review. As such, a Final Plat is required. The submitted plan does not meet any of the Final Plat requirements found in DS 2-03.6. Submit a Final Plat meeting all the requirements of DS 2-03.6. 2. A separate sheet is required which will contain all site information not required on the Final Plat sheet. Generally, the Final Plat is a survey document. The Final Plat sheet should include only information specified in DS 2-03.6. All site plan information (as found in DS 2-02.2.1.a) must be on a separate Site Plan sheet. Include on the Site Plan sheet all information required in DS 2-02.2.1.a 3. The proposed street must meet the requirements of DS 3-01.2.3 &2.4 and figure 1 or figure 2. The proposed design does not meet these standards for width, parking, sidewalks, curbs, etc. 4. Dead-end streets must be designed with an adequate turnaround at the dead end. DS 3-01.6.2.B See DS 3-01 figures 20, 21, 23 for required turnaround design. 5. Sidewalk is required on Lee. The required width is four feet, three feet from back of curb. 6. The Drainage Statement refers to this being a lot split. The is not a lot split, it is a plat. Change the verbiage. The statement must meet the requirements of the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 2.3.2. Specifically, stormwater must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under existing conditions. SMDDFM, 12.5. The Drainage Statement must locate and quantify existing and proposed flows (both offsite to onsite and onsite to offsite). It must show that proposed drainage conditions essentially reflect existing conditions. The proposed drainage scheme must be included in the Drainage Statement and shown on the submitted Site Plan sheet. James C. Tate, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer |
| 05/03/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-046 515 E LEE ST./MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: 4/28/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Recorded deeds will need to be provided before addresses will be assigned. Correct Location Map scale. Correct Sections on Location Map. Change lot 3 to lot 1 of “Avondale Resub.” Spell out all street suffixes. Label Elida Street. |
| 05/03/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: LEE ST: MINOR SUBDIVISION S04-046 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated April 19, 2004. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Application for electrical service for each lot should be made by contacting the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Load and building plans are necessary in order to provide a preliminary layout. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 05/04/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-046 CORONADO ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT INC. 5115 E. LEE ST. |
| 05/12/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | |
| 05/13/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/19/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 13, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-046 5115 E. Lee St: Minor Subdivision Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 05/19/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this minor subdivision review: 1. This proposal will be accessing 3 parcels therefore this will be classified as a street. As such, parking will be required on both sides of the street. (DS 3-01.0 fig.2) or provide parking in a common area (not shown) in which case the travel lanes will have to be 12' wide. 2. This street is in excess of 150' long, therefore a turn around is required at the end. (DS 3-01.6.2.B) 3. This proposal is creating a new street that will intersect with the existing Lee Street. Curb returns of 18' minimum radius are required at the intersection (DS 3-01.3.2.C) D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/20/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before April 19, 2005. 2. In the location map, reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page number. (D.S. 2-03.6.1.D.2) 3. Place the words "Book ____ Page ____" in both the upper and lower right corners outside the margin line. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation. 4. Title Block Requirements: 1. Subdivision name, number of lots, and common areas if applicable. 2. Legal Description which includes the Section, Township and Range. 3. If the Subdivision Survey is a re-subdivision of a previously recorded plat, indicate the title and book and page reference of the existing subdivision. 5. The subdivision case number assigned to this project will be placed in the lower right corner of the drawing next to the title block. This project has been assigned the case number S04-046. 6. List the following general note, "The gross area of the site is ______ acres." 7. List the following general note, "The total number of lots is ______." 8. List the following general note, " There will be no further division of lots without the expressed approval of the City of Tucson." 9. List the following general note, "(I/We), the undersigned, do hereby hold harmless the City of Tucson, its successors and assigns, their employees, officers, and agents from any and all claims for damages related to the use of the property depicted on the plan now and in the future by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." By:_______________________ Date:___________________ 10. RECORDING DATA State of Arizona ) No. _____ ) SS Fee: ______ County of Pima ) This instrument was filed for record at the request of ________________ on this the _____day of ___________, 2004 at __________ .m. in book _______ of maps and plats at page ______ thereof. F. Ann Rodriguez ____________________ County Recorder Deputy County Recorder 11. If applicable, indicate the width of each, easement (type), and drainageway within the subdivision boundary being created by this plat. Label each as public or private, along with the appropriate dedication notation. (Refuse containers) 12. Show no-vehicular access easements where applicable. 13. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. 14. A second and/or third sheet is to be included with the final plat, which demonstrates how the proposed subdivision will meet the applicable LUC criteria for the proposed use/development designator and development standards (i.e. sheet 1 of 1 submitted for review). The following comments are for the site plan (i.e. sheet 1 of 1) which demonstrates how the lots will be developed: a) Per D.S. 3-01.2.4.D, local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common parking areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision. The plan shows one parking space on each lot, two more spaces are required for each lot. Label and dimension the other parking spaces required. b) Concrete driveways are required for each home if a sidewalk will not be provided along the entire street frontage. (D.S. 3-01.3.3.A.4) c) CC&R's are required for maintenance of private street. d) The lot north of parcel A must be included in this subdivision. Provide the lot dimensions and bearings on the plat and note the existing and proposed use on the site plan drawing. If it is to remain vacant please state as so. e) Provide lot coverage calculations for all lots proposed for development. f) Carport/Garages must meet the setback criteria listed under LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.2. Demonstrate compliance on the site plan drawing. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/24/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. This project will be tributary to both the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tucson Boulevard Flow Control Facilities. Treatment and conveyance capacity was allocated for this project, when the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility was first designed and built.. Based on our historical records, this project would qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate. 3. Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 4. Add a General Note that states: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, A JOINT USE AND MAINTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE SHARED PRIVATE SEWER LINE WILL BE RECORDED. The Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement will need to be reviewed and approved by Ms. Ilene Deckard of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department before it is signed and recorded. Please contact Ms. Deckard at 740-6544 regarding the required content of this Agreement. 5. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the subdivision exception. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided on the first sheet. Copy: Project |
| 05/25/2004 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/27/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 05/27/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-046 5115 E. Lee St. 5/26/04 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (minor subdivision plat) CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant/Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: none COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/18/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 5/26/04 |
| 05/28/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | |
| 05/28/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | RECORD LEGAL DESC | Needs Review |