Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-035
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/19/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/19/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-035 SAM HUGHES AT THE CORNER/REVISED FINAL PLAT DATE: May 13, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 05/25/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | S04-035 Engineering Review Comments for final plat resubmittal 10MAY04 1. Assurable items must be completed prior to final plat approval. DSD Engineering will not sign off prior to construction and acceptance of the assurable items. (see previous comment #1) 2. Floodplain limits, including the FEMA 100-year floodplain limits, must be shown in a surveyable manner. Provide frequent ties to the building corners. Rick Engineering submitted and sealed the limits as shown on the approved development plan. The final plat requires surveyable limits with ties. (see previous comment #4) 3. The title block calls out Units 1-57 even though such units do not exist. Suggest saying "57 Condominium Units". (see previous comment #6) 4. Although we will not, at this time and for this project, require the common areas/elements to be called out separately in the title block, future submittals for other projects will be required to call out the uses of the common areas/elements. (see previous comment #7) 5. Please check the wall heights as compared to the elevations for the sections through the various buildings. There seems to be little to no correlation of the dimensions and elevations. 6. Article 7.1.4 in the Declaration calls out the approved development plan that does not appear to be part of the Declaration or Final Plat. Call out the recording information for the development plan or show the drainage facilities on the plat. Strike the words "and the Association fails to take corrective measures within a reasonable period of time" from Article 7.1.4. (see previous comment #19) 7. The areas for Units 6102-6105 could not be located. (see previous comment #27) Reviewer: Matt Flick |
| 05/25/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-035 Sam Hughes at the Corner (Condominiums) Final Plat TRANSMITTAL: May 25, 2004 DUE DATE: May 24, 2004 COMMENTS: 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before March 24, 2005. 2. The entire previous comment has been left as reference only. It is not common practice to sell parking spaces within a Condominium development. Please clarify how the sale of the spaces will be made. Per your response to Jim Tate's comment 20, the owner will have the option to purchase a parking space. How is the parking to be sold, fee simple, interest, included with the sale of the condo? Also parking spaces are based on the use for the commercial uses and based on the number of bedrooms for the residential units. A lot of questions have come up with the proposal for the sale of the required parking spaces. I cannot approve the final plat without clarification on this issue. Please provide a detailed response letter regarding the sale of parking spaces as it pertains to the following, number of spaces a owner can purchase, does the location of the spaces affect the cost, what about the parking garages that are attached to the condos in buildings 5 and 6, what if a owner does not wish to purchase a space, how are the CC&R's affected and how will they be amended. Please submit a revised copy of the CC&R's with changes reflecting the parking issue. (Previous Comment: I have reviewed comments made by Jim Tate, Engineering Section Reviewer and most of the comments he has made would be similar to ones that I would make for Zoning. Please include in the Zoning comments response letter the responses to the following comments made by the Engineering reviewer; comments 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 22.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S04035fp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat and CC&R's and additional requested documents |
| 05/25/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Engineering approves the Sam Hughes Final Plat. S04-035. June 7, 2004 |