Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-032
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/18/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved March 18, 2004. |
| 03/19/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-032 TANQUE VERDE CENTER / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: March 18, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Label section corners on Location Map. 2: Dos Hombres Road exists only north of Tanque Verde Rd. Correct location of street on Location Map. 3: Correct Paseo Rancho Esperero to Paseo Rancho Esperanza on sheet 1. 4: Label “Match” sheets on sheet 2 and sheet 3. |
| 03/25/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-032 RICK ENGINEERING CO INC. TANQUE VERDE CENTER |
| 04/02/2004 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/02/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 2, 2004 TO: Chuck Martin Rick Engineering Company, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Tanque Verde Center, Lots 1-58 Tentative Plat/Development Plan - 1st Submittal S04-032 The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. This project may be tributary to both, Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S04-032, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. 3. SHEET 1. Add the project reference number C9-95-29 to the title block. 4. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 5. Include the number of proposed fixture units. 6. SHEET 1. Within the legend, include a symbol that defines proposed manholes, or label each manhole as "NEW" on the layout. 7. SHEETS 4 & 5. For reference purposes, assign a number to each proposed manhole. 8. SHEETS 4 & 5. Include all existing sewer projects within 100 feet of the project boundaries. Show sewer size, Pima County plan number, manhole number, manhole rim elevation and manhole invert elevation. If existing sewer is public or private, label it as such. 9. SHEET 4. Provide sewer line information for line next to lot 23. 10. SHEET 5. Behind lot 53, eliminate the proposed manhole and connect to the existing manhole. 11. SHEET 5. Revise spelling for AVENIDA VALIENTE. 12. A complete set of revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments is required. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. The review fee is $50.00 per revised sheet for the second submittal. The second submittal will include 2 revised sheet and a check for $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of revised sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6947. Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) Copy: Project DF/df |
| 04/05/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | Following are the items of concerns for refuse collection: * Enclosure east of Paseo Rancho Esperanza cannot be serviced off 24 feet PAAL at the drawn angle. * Enclosure detail shown does not comply to the standard detail. Bollards are called for on the inside walls and standard calls for a the clear area to be 10 feet minimum. With bollards that is 12 feet inside the CMU walls. * Project does not show any provisions for recycling. |
| 04/08/2004 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on March 17, 2004 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: 1. Address any erosion and scour mitigation measures that may be needed at the proposed drainage structures and basins inlets and/or outlets. 2. Determine the proposed slope treatment and setback lines from the detention/retention basins based on the Soils report recommendation. 3. Address roof drainage and sidewalk scuppers needed for roof drainage. 4. Address water-harvesting. 5. Provide maintenance ramps for all proposed detention basins. Design information should be included. 6. The proposed western detention basin appears to be very close to lot #15. Determine the basin setback line based on the Soils Report recommendations and verify that the basin location is appropriate. 7. The detention/retention basin bottoms must be graded to provide positive drainage to prevent nuisance ponding. 8. Show on the onsite drainage map the proposed detention/retention basins side slopes, maintenance access ramps, dimensions including depth and the 100-year water surface elevation. Verify that security barriers are not required. 9. This Office recommends including the maintenance checklist in the CC & R's to allow the owners' association access to it and to facilitate their maintenance responsibility. Tentative Plat/Development Plan: 1. Provide the correct S (yr)-______ subdivision case number according to D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1. 2. It appears that the Rezoning Case Number shown in the Title Block is incorrect. 3. The Basis of Bearing on the first sheet appears not to match the bearing shown on the plan. Revise as necessary. 4. Add in the General Notes the "Drainage will remain…" note as required by 2-05.2.2.C.1.b. 5. Add the "All weather access shall be provided for this subdivision" note to the General Notes. 6. It does not appear that Lot 55 meets the differential grading requirements. Verify and revise as needed. 7. Label the proposed Common Areas as to their proposed use (i.e. Common Area "A" (Drainage Facilities), Common Area "B" (Recreation Facilities) etc.). Multiple use can also be shown (i.e. Common Area "A" (Drainage/Recreation Facilities) etc.). Revise the plan and the Title Block accordingly. 8. Show the proposed detention/retention basins inlets and outlets and any erosion control measures (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.3). 9. Show setback lines from the proposed detention/retention basins as determined by the Soils Report (D.S. 2-03.2.4.M.). 10. Show the detention/retention basins dimensions and side slopes. 11. Show the proposed detention/retention maintenance access ramps. Please be advised that maintenance ramps should be designed in such a way that does not allow access to vehicles except the maintenance vehicles. 12. Show the water harvesting areas on the Tentative Plat and demonstrate compliance with Rezoning Condition #14. 13. Show 1' (foot) no vehicular access easement along parcel boundary and/or along lot lines abutting common areas as required by D.S. 2-03.2.4.F. and D.S. 3-01.6.1.H. 14. It is not clear if the sidewalks shown along Avenida Valiete and Paseo Rancho Esperanza are existing or proposed. Clarify. 15. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement. 16. Due to the size of this project, it will require a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Submit a SWPPP with the Grading Plan submittal. 17. Revise the Tentative Plat according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. Show water-harvesting basins. 2. Show sight visibility triangles to ensure that the proposed landscaping will not obstruct sight at street intersections. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report and Landscape Plan |
| 04/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: TANQUE VERDE CENTER S04-032 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated March 16, 2004. As you are aware there are existing facilities within the boundaries of this project, any relocation costs will be billable to the developer. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit you plans a minimum of six (6) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 04/12/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: April 8, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-032 Tanque Verde Center T131532 (114-46) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: IN ORDER FOR THIS PLAT TO MEET ASSESSOR’S REQUIREMENTS, PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS: ADD BEARINGS FOR ALL LOTS. ADD COMPLETE CURVE DATA. DENOTE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR COMMON AREA “A”. SHOW DIMS AND BEARINGS TO SECTION TIE. (S1/4) THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA AT 740-4390. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 04/14/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the native plant preservation plan notes regarding required monitoring and inspections to refer to the DSD Landscape Section rather than the Parks and Recreation or Planning Departments. LUC 3.8.6.7.D 2) Revise the landscape plan notes on sheet 1 of the landscape plan regarding landscape requirements to clarify that landscape borders and screening elements per LUC Table 3.7.2-I are also required along Paseo Rancho Esperanza and Avenida Valiente. 3) Revise the landscape plan and the tentative plat/development plan to show the dimensions for the required landscape borders along all streets. Provide dimensions for interior borders also. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2 4) Correct the spelling for Avenide Valiente on the tentative plat. 5) Revise the landscape plan to show the required landscape border and screening along Paseo Rancho Esperanza adjacent to Lot 58. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 6) Revise the landscape as necessary to include screening for parking areas adjacent to public or private streets. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 7) Add the rezoning case reference number and the CDRC case number to the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1 8) Include the retention basin depths and the slope ratios on the landscape plan. Basin slopes are to be designed in accordance the requirements of DS 10-01.0 (p. 77-78). Revise all plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.4.3 9) Per condition of rezoning 1C a 6' wall is required along the eastern edge of the western buffer. Revise the plans to relocate the required wall, revise the proposed height, and add notes or details that indicate compliance with the requirements related to wall, alignment and design features. 10) Add a note to the landscape plan regarding the timing of perimeter wall construction along the eastern portion of the site. C9-95-29 #1C 11) Add a note to indicate compliance with condition 1.G to the landscape plan. This condition requires landscaping to minimize the visual impact of vehicle stacking areas related to drive through windows. 12) Rezoning Condition 4 requires that mitigation for indigenous trees greater than 6" in caliper which are destroyed during site preparation or construction. A 48" box tree or three 15 g. size trees are required for each one destroyed. Revise the landscape and plant preservation plans as necessary. 13) Rezoning Condition 4 also requires a landscape buffer with a minimum width of 75' along the east property boundary. A significant revision of the plans is necessary to comply with this condition. 14) Per condition 14 rooftop drainage is to be released to flow into designated water harvesting basins. Revise the plans to comply with the condition. 15) Condition 16 restricts the construction of walls which do not provide adequate access to the Udall Wash. Revise all plans as necessary SUBMIT REVISED PLANS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE AND NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION. |
| 04/15/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-032 Tanque Verde Center 04/15/04 (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C12-96-39, C9-95-29 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sabino Canyon - Tanque Verde Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N.A. COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/13/2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: APosner 791-4505 DATE: 4/12/20004 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments S04 - 032, TANQUE VERDE CENTER The applicant's request to a five-year time extension on the property located along Tanque Verde Road east of Sabino Canyon Road that was approved by Mayor and Council is subject to meeting certain conditions. 1) Please provide elevation drawings of all structures and signs, fully dimensioned and labeled with colors and materials, in order to ensure compliance with zoning conditions 1.b. and 1.e. 2) Please provide elevation drawings of perimeter walls in order to show compliance with Zoning Conditions Section 1.c. 3) Western and eastern perimeter walls do not meet conditions of zoning approval. Plans show walls to be five feet when conditions require six feet. Plans show walls to be straight and contiguous when conditions require curves, jogs, or notches. Include a note stating that all screen walls will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. 4) Please provide a detail elevation of the perimeter wall along the eastern boundary, as this wall has special conditions due to its proximity to the Desert Anchors Subdivision (Zoning Conditions Section 1.c.). 5) Plan revision is required with respect to Zoning Condition 4, the width of the landscaped buffer area around the perimeter of the project site. The North side perimeter appears adequate. However, the western and eastern buffers do not comply with zoning conditions. 6) Plan revision is required with respect to the sidewalk on the north side of Tanque Verde Road. Plans currently show the sidewalk 4-feet wide, when 6-feet is required. The text of the zoning conditions on sheet 6 also needs updating. 7) It was recommended that outdoor lighting be directed downward and shielded away from adjacent residential areas and public roadways, and be no higher than the tallest retail, commercial, or office building or 30-feet. Please put a note on the development plan indicating compliance with this condition, and provide a detail of the outdoor lighting. Strike the words "Five years are allowed in which to comply" for Zoning Conditions text on sheet 6 of development plans. |
| 04/16/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-032 Tanque Verde Center, Lots 1-58 and Common Areas "A", "B", "C" Tentative plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: April 13, 2004 DUE DATE: April 13, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is March 17, 2005. I had a meeting and discussion with Craig Gross and Glenn Moyer regarding the difference in commercial building square footage versus what was proposed in the preliminary development plan and with regards to the change in concept. It has been determined that this plan will require a new public hearing and the approval by Mayor and Council of the change of concept and additional square footage. Additional conditions could be placed and would require additional review and possibly redesign. If you have any questions regarding this comment please contact Glenn Moyer for more information and procedures. 2. Label all applicable section corners that are within the one square mile location map. DS 2-03.2.1.D.3 and DS 2-05.2.2.1.D.3 3. On Sheet one (1) under the owner's text block, list the Owner's phone number. DS 2-03.2.2.A.1 and DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 4. This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S04-032. List the subdivision case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. Also list the rezoning case number C9-95-29 next to the title block or revise the number listed as C9-25-09. The rezoning case C9-25-09 could not be verified as applicable to this site. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 and DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 5. In addition to the specific uses and development designators proposed for this project, list the applicable LUC subject to: section numbers as follows: for Food Service Use: Subject to section 3.5.4.6.A.and.C, for Medical Service Outpatient: Subject to section 3.5.4.8.B, General Merchandise: Subject to 3.5.9.2.C. Revise as required. DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 and DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 6. Revise general note six (6) to include a statement that the that states that "This plat has been designed to meet the criteria of the Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone Section 2.8.3." DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 and DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 7. Please label all common areas with the common area designation and the square footage. List the common area types i.e. vehicular use area, detention, landscaping. DS 2-03.2.4.C 8. Draw and label the perimeter boundary building setback as it relates to the adjacent zoning classification, the two streets, Paseo Rancho Esperanza and Avenida Valiete, and Tanque Verde Road. The building setbacks along the interior street frontage will be based on the greater of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the back of curb location. The building setback along the Tanque Verde Road street frontage is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the back of future curb location. The required building setback along the north property line adjacent to R-1 zoning and adjacent to R-3 zoning along the northeast portion of the site. Keynotes addressing the required setbacks have been listed on all sheets but the keynote symbols were not placed on the plan indicating which lines are the building setback lines. DS 2-03.2.4.M 9. Add to detail drawing A-6, the proposed vehicle covered parking structure. The detail drawing must include the distance between the facia of both structures when the structures are placed on both side of the PAAL. The minimum distance between structures should 26 feet between the structure fascias or roof overhang. The same is true if the covered parking is proposed on one side of the PAAL a minimum of one-foot setback from the end of the parking space. Add, dimension, and label as required. Also include the height of the covered parking structures, the location of the support columns. The support columns must not obstruct the opening of car doors. Dimension all back-up spurs. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 10. Please review the pedestrian circulation path and draw and label painted crosswalks that create the required continuous pedestrian circulation and accessible route. Add accessible ramps at all required connections such as crosswalk to sidewalk, or at all sidewalk and handicapped vehicle access aisle connection. (Label all sidewalk widths.) Where vehicle-parking spaces abut sidewalks the spaces must be provided with wheel stops that are to be placed two and one-half feet from the front of the parking spaces. If the wheel stops are not to be provided for parking spaces that abut a sidewalk, the width of the sidewalk must be increased to six and one-half feet. The minimum clear width of a sidewalk is to be four feet. Revise dimension as required. DS 2-05.2.4.K 11. Provide as a note, the square footage of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed for each building, i.e. building one, 2400 square feet, 1500 square feet retail 900 square feet office. A matrix table that provides this information would be satisfactory. DS 2-05.2.4.M 12. Although there is no dispute as to the number of loading zones required for the proposed uses and square footages as noted in the letter which was signed by Craig Gross concurring the number of loading required, the proposed development does not meet the criteria as a campus style development, therefore loading zones must be provided for contiguous buildings. The loading zones must be provided based on the square footage and use of the contiguous buildings. I have discussed this issue with Walter Tellez and he has concurred upon seeing the proposed development plan that this development does not meet the criteria as a campus style development for purposes of applying the requirement for loading zones. Please revise the plan and provide the loading zones as required and revise the loading zone calculation. Please demonstrate maneuverability into and out of all the loading spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.O 13. Revise the parking calculations to include the number of parking spaces required for the Food Service uses. Include the combined building square footage proposed for the Food Service use (restaurant). Food Service is parked at one space per 100 square feet of gross floor area if onsite consumption only. Please revise the calculations accordingly and provide additional parking spaces if required. Revise the mixed-use calculation as well. (If drive-through lanes are proposed for any of the restaurants please depict drive-through lanes at the specific building or lot locations. The design of the drive through lanes must comply with the width, height, and number of stacking spaces per lane as noted in development standards 3-05. The 641 parking spaces as noted in the parking calculation could not be verified. Per several counts 638 spaces were accounted for. I realize two spaces are not a big deal but the calculation should be accurate. Please review the plan and revise as required. Please revise the overall parking calculation for the number of parking spaces provided. The calculation should state the total number of parking spaces that have been provided including the 18 handicapped spaces. Also please revise the handicapped parking space calculation for the number required from eight (8) spaces to 14 spaces. The number of handicapped parking spaces is based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided. Per the IBC 2000 Code, Section 1106 table 1106-1, when providing between 501 spaces to 1000, two (2) percent of the spaces provided must be handicapped spaces. (Of the total of handicapped spaces provided, for every eight spaces or percent of eight spaces one space must be a van accessible space which requires an access aisle with a minimum width of eight (8) feet. Per the plan, it appears that required number of handicapped spaces has been provided plus an additional six (6) spaces. In addition, eight-foot wide access aisles have been provided adjacent to the handicapped spaces.) 14. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. The bicycle parking calculation has to be revised to include the number of class one (1) and class two (2) spaces provided based on the ratio and percentage of class one and two facilities for each use. The number of bicycle parking spaces is based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided. Please revise the calculation appropriately. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 15. Please insure that the proposed freestanding sign, which is located at the northeast corner of Paseo Rancho and Tanque Verde Road, is out of the sight visibility triangle. DS 2-05.2.4.R 16. The approach onto the dumpster location that is across from lot 24 appears to be over the loading zone. Please relocate the dumpster and insure that approach will not have to occur over the loading zone. DS 2-05.2.4.T 17. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. In addition submit a separate response memo stating how each one of the rezoning conditions that are applicable to this development have been addressed. DS 2-05.2.4.U 18. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V 19. See the landscape reviewer's comments regarding the requirements for landscape borders, screening and NPPO. DS 2-05.2.4.X 20. This development is divided into three sections by the two (2) north/south streets. Technically all LUC development criteria are to be calculated based on the use on the proposed property. This development is to be subdivided into lots that do not provide sufficient lot area to comply with the floor area ratios allowed for the development designators 28 and 29. Therefore Walter Tellez has determined that the most restrictive floor area ratio could be based on the square footage of the development area as divided by the two streets. In other words the LUC code data for the development designators and specific uses on each section should be listed separately. The three sections should be described as west, center, and east or Section A, Section B, and Section C etc. for purposes of listing the required development criteria such as proposed uses with applicable subject to section, allowed and proposed FAR, building heights, required and provided vehicle and bicycle parking, loading zones, handicapped parking, and interior and perimeter building setbacks. Please provide LUC data such as FAR, vehicle and bicycle parking, loading, etc. based on the individual sections of the this development. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S04032tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 04/16/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 15, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-032 Tanque Verde Center: TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 04/20/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 04/20/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no objections |
| 04/20/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P./DP 1. Several of the SVTs are mislabeled in this drawing. Paseo Rancho Esperanza and Avenita Valiente (for purposes of SVT sizing) are local roads. All access points to the development are PAALs. All stem sides of the SVTs are 20'. Resize and relabel SVTs appropriately. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |