Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-029
Review Name: OTHER SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/12/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/16/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 16, 2004 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the BlacklidgeSubdivision Exception. The activity number is S04-029. SUMMARY: The Subdivision Record of Survey was received by Engineering on March 12, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received item and does not recommend approval of the Subdivision Exception. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION RECORD OF SURVEY The next submittal must address the following items: 1. On the location map note the section township and range. 2. Place the words "Book ____ Page ____" in both the upper and lower right corners outside the margin line. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation. 3. Include in the Title Block the name of the proposed Subdivision Exception and identify the proposed lots (i.e. Lots A,B,C,D,E). 4. List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary owners of the site. 5. Place the subdivision exception case number (S04-029) in the lower right hand corner of the plan next to the title block. 6. Include the note, "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 7. The DEDICATION section does not need two signature lines. Include only one signature line under all the DEDICATION paragraphs. 8. Include in the DEDICATION section the paragraph, "I hereby grant to the Public and all utility companies all easements as shown hereon for the purposes of access for installation and maintenance of public sewers and utilities and other uses as designated by this plan." 9. In the RECORDING DATA section replace "PIMA COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE" with: F. Ann Rodriguez ________________________ County Recorder Deputy County Recorder 10. In the CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY section replace "on this plat" with "on this plan" 11. At least one (1) corner of the property will be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner, or an established City or County survey monument. The plan must include a description of that corner monument. 12. All existing easements must be drawn on the plan, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes will be included. 13. The following information regarding the existing public right-of-way will be provided on the plan: the name, right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 14. All proposed easements are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Indicate all easements with accurate dimensions and bearings. James C. Tate, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer |
| 03/16/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-029 BLACKLIDGE SUB EXCEPTION/SUBX DATE: March 16, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Recorded deeds for each lot split is required prior to address assignment. Label section corners on Location Map. Spell out Boulevard for Sparkman on Site Plan. Delete direction from street names on Location Map. jg |
| 03/25/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Blacklidge Sub Exception S04-029 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the Land Split plan dated March 4, 2004. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this plan. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of existing facilities will be billable to the developer. Application for electrical service for each parcel should be made by contacting the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Load plans are necessary in order to provide a preliminary layout. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 03/25/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S04-029 STICH DEVELOPMENT, LLC BLACKLIDGE SUB EXCEPTION |
| 04/02/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | General comments: * Per Std. 6-01.2.2, Refuse collection for single residence will be behind the curb in front of the residence. Plan doesnot provide for collection as shown. * A centralized collection area/enclosure is recommended where codes requirements cannot be met. * A general note added to the Tentitve Plat should state the agree collection of the refuse for the development. |
| 04/07/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/07/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 7, 2004 TO: Bill Dyas, Stich Development, LLC THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Blacklidge (Lot Split Exception) Subdivision Exception - 1st Submittal S04-029 The above-referenced submittal has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department and the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. The following comments are offered for your use: This project is in an area tributary to both the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility or Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillitio West (North Line) Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. Add the subdivision plat case number, S04-029, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. No structures of any kind (walls, fences, ramadas, etc.) may be built within the existing public sewer easements, and a stabilized driving surface must be provided from the Palo Verde Avenue over the existing public sewer line on the property in accordance with Pima County Standard Detail WWM 111. Pima County’s large and heavy sewer maintenance vehicles must be able to reach the terminal manhole in this public sewer line. This project will need to sewered by private sewers. Provide a separate Utility Plan sheet which shows how all 5 lots will be provided with sewer service, including all of the following: Show and label all existing sewers on and within 100 feet of the project boundaries along with manhole numbers, sewer size(s) and Pima County plan numbers. Show and label all existing public sewer easements on or adjacent to this property with their width, type and recording information. See the as-built sewer plans for existing public sewer lines M-271 (which show a 10’ easement) and M-304 (which show a 15-foot easement). Please note that while the assessor’s map shows a public sewer easement per Docket 1395, Page 320, this recording information is incorrect. The instrument recorded at this Docket & Page is a Contract for Sale of Real Estate pertaining to a property near 22nd Street. If you find that this public sewer line is not in a recorded public sewer easement, one will need to be granted at this time that conforms with PC/COT Standard Details WWM 111. Show the stabilized driving surface that will be placed over the existing public sewer line in both the plan view and in a cross section. Show all existing and proposed private sewer lines (House Connection Sewers) labeled with their size and the letters, HCS. Show the existing public sewer lines, and all proposed private sewer lines using different linetypes and weights, so they can be readily told apart. Show and describe the different linetypes used for the existing public sewer lines and the proposed private sewer lines within a legend. Show and label any private sewer easements that will need to be created with their width and type. Please note that it appears that a private sewer easement needs to be created for the existing house as well as for some of the new homes. On the Record of Survey: Show and label all existing public sewer easements on or adjacent to this property with their width, type and recording information. Show and label all proposed private sewer easements that will need to be created along with their width, type and all necessary survey data necessary to locate the boundaries of the easements. Check with COT CDRC to find out if you can grant and record any necessary private sewer easements with this instrument, or whether this must be done via a separate instrument, and label the easement appropriately on the Record of Survey. Please let me know what you were told, in your review letter, and by whom, so that I may contact them if I have any questions about this matter. If you can grant and record any necessary private sewer easements with this instrument, modify the Dedication as necessary to do this. Add a General Note that states: ALL LANDSCAPING IN EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES IN PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. If one or more shared private sewer lines will be utilized, add a General Note that states, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE RECORDED FOR ALL SHARED PRIVATE SEWER LINES. If one or more shared private sewer lines will be utilized, contact Ms. Ilene Deckard of Pima County Wastewater Management for guidelines concerning the necessary Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement. Ms. Deckard will need review and approve the Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement before it is signed and recorded. A revised blueline of the Record of Survey, a blueline of the Utility Plan, and a response letter, addressing these comments is required. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal, and a check for $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany these bluelines and response letter, to pay the wastewater review fees required by Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.B. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6947. Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) Copy: Project DF/df |
| 04/07/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this other subdivision review. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/09/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-029 Blacklidge Subdivision, Lots A- E Minor Subdivision Exception TRANSMITTAL: April 9, 2004 DUE DATE: April 7, 2004 COMMENTS 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before March 11, 2005. 2. This plat has been reviewed for compliance with the newly drafted development standards (still a draft as of this date). Please address the following comments and resubmit for review and approval. 3. Reference in the location map all the recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers within the defined square mile. DS 2-03.11.7.D.2 The adjacent section corners must be referenced on the location map. DS 2-03.11.7.D.3 4. The words "BOOK ____ PAGE ____" must be placed in both the upper and lower right corners outside the margin line. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation. DS 2-03.11.7.E 5. The title block must include the following information: The name of the subdivision shall not duplicate or approximate the name of any other recorded subdivision in Pima County. The number of lots must be listed in the title block. "Lots "A" -"E". DS 2-03.11.7.F.1 and .2 6. List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary owner and developer of the site. DS 2-03.11.8.A 7. This project has been assigned the case number S04-034. List the case number in the lower right corner of the next to the title block of all sheets. DS 2-03.11.8.B.1 8. List the gross area of the site as a general note. DS 2-03.11.B.4 9. Add the following sentence as a general note: "There will be no further division of lots without the expressed approval of the City Of Tucson". DS 2-03.11.8.B.5 10. List under the general notes text block the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public". DS 2-03.11.8.C 11. One of the requirements to qualify for this type of review and approval process is that sidewalks and curbs be provided along the street frontage. Per the plan curbs exist in the right-of-way but it is not clear if sidewalks exist. If at this time the required sidewalks do not exist along the street frontage it is my understanding that the sidewalks must be constructed prior to approval of the Record of Survey. If sidewalks have been constructed indicate on the plan the location and width of the concrete sidewalks. DS 2-03.11.10.B 12. The following information regarding existing utilities will be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, and storm and sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Show sewer line invert elevations. DS 2-03.11.10.C 13. Label the existing zoning classifications adjacent to the subdivision boundaries. DS 2-03.11.10.D 14. All existing easements must be depicted on the plan. The location, width, and purpose of each easement must be labeled. All proposed easements must be recorded by separate instrument and the recordation information for those proposed easements must be labeled on the plan. All proposed easements, which are shown on the plan, must be labeled with the words "To be recorded by separate instrument" and the recordation information must be labeled. DS 2-03.11.11.A 15. A general note that states that lots "D" and "E" will be restricted to development of one (1) unit per lot is required to be added to the plat under the general notes text block. Please add the note as required. 16. Add a general note that states that a separate submittal, review, and approval of a site plan and building plans for a building permit is required for each lot. 17. As mentioned in comment two (2) this Record of Survey has been reviewed for compliance with the newly drafted development standards for a minor subdivision exception. These standards are a work in process and could vary and may require additional information added or required on the plan such as notes or detail drawings due to review comments. The committee that has worked on these standards has tried to incorporate all necessary requirements that should be made part of the record of survey drawing for the minor subdivision exception. If you as a Registered Land Surveyor have information that you feel is necessary to the completeness of the Record of Survey please feel free to respond in your response letter to the CDRC committee. Additional comments may be forthcoming on subsequent submittal packets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\recordofsurvey\S04029ros.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Record of Surveyu drawing and additional requested documents |
| 04/09/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 09, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-029 Blacklidge Sub Exception: Other Subdivision Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 04/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 04/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | RECORD LEGAL DESC | Denied | |
| 04/12/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-029 BLACKLIDGE SUB EXCEPTION/SUBX DATE: April 12, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Recorded deeds for each lot split is required prior to address assignment. 2.) Label section corners on Location Map. 3.) Spell out Boulevard for Sparkman on Site Plan. 4.) Delete direction from street names on Location Map. |
| 04/12/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-029 Blacklidge Sub Exception 04/09/04 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/07/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment SEE COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN’S POSITION ON CONCERNS WITH THESE TYPES OF INFILL PROJECTS () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan REVIEWER: Deborah Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 04/07/04 URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS S04-029 BLACKLIDGE SUB EXCEPTION The Grant-Alvernon Area Plan, General Plan and Design Guidelines provides land use policy direction for this areas as follows: GENERAL GOALS FOR GRANT-ALVERNON AREA PLAN Encourage provision of safe and efficient circulation systems for all appropriate modes of transportation, especially pedestrian and bicycle; A. GENERAL SITE DESIGN: Guideline 3. Provide a well-defined pedestrian system linking adjacent uses, connecting to the public sidewalk system, offering convenient access to transit facilities, and providing secure bicycle parking facilities, as an integral component of development. CITY OF TUCSON GENERAL PLAN Element 3: Circulation Design Guideline I.A.4.c., Parking, Loading and Maneuvering, is intended to provide safe vehicular parking, loading and maneuvering, with attention to functional and aesthetic concerns such as trash removal, emergency access, and reduction of heat build-ups. Solutions include shared loading areas and dumpsters, and use of vegetation to reduce heat build-up. DESIGN GUIDELINES Parking, Loading and Maneuvering (I.A.4.c) Related Policy Link – LU Policy 3(3.10) Solution One – Develop comprehensive vehicular circulation system that allows parking, loading, and maneuvering to be contained wholly within the development. Functional and aesthetic issues could be addressed through the following: Shared loading area and dumpsters DISCUSSION From the Department of Urban Planning & Design’s point of view, multiple land divisions, without having to do a tentative and/or final plat, may cause some concerns This particular case, as it has been submitted, proposes a lot split creating two parcels, one measuring 8,575.62 and the other 6,701.89, both sharing a proposed 30.04’ ingress, egress and utility easement. From the Urban Planning & Design’s point of view, the following concerns should be addressed: There is no turn around for emergency and utility vehicles. Because there is no turn around, the property owners of the lots would be forced to drag their dumpsters out to Palo Verde Street, an inconvenience. |
| 04/12/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments. |