Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S04-028
Parcel: Unknown

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S04-028
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/11/2004 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/12/2004 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved no comments.
03/12/2004 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved 03/12/04.
03/16/2004 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S04-028 ACACIA LANE/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: March 12, 2004



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

APPROVED: ON FINAL PLAT
DELETE ALL STREET ADDRESSES.
LABEL APPROVED INTERIOR STREET NAME.


***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when
submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima
County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing
and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s
Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***
03/19/2004 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved
03/25/2004 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved no comments.
03/25/2004 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved All lots can be serviced from the front of the respective lots by Environmental Services.
03/30/2004 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

RICK LYONS
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: March 30, 2004


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S04-028 Acacia Lane T151312 (138-10)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
If the residences around the subdivision are not part of a subdivision, please use the term UNSUBDIVIDED. Indicate if the area across Drexel Road is unsubdivided or not.
Add the complete curve data.
Add the bearing for the 11.89’ in lot 5
Add perimeter dimension and bearing for the south line of the subdivision.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.





Susan C. King
04/01/2004 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied April 1, 2004

TO: Tom Trimble
Trimble Engineering

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson Development Services

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Acacia Lane Lots 1-8
Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal
S04-028

The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use:

This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date.

Add the subdivision plat case number, S04-028, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

Show a symbol for existing sewer lines and manholes in legend.

Show a symbol for the proposed private HCSs in legend.

Label the existing sewer line with its size and Pima County plan number.

In General Note 11, delete the following

“THE C.C & R’S WILL SPECIFY THIS BY A JOINT USE AGREEMENT.”

SHEET 1. Add the following note

“A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.”

We will require a complete set of revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. The review fee is $50 per revised sheet for the second submittal. The second submittal will include 1 revised sheet and a check for $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of revised sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6947.





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

Copy: Project

DF/df
04/02/2004 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: ACACIA LANE
Lots 1-8
S04-028

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the City of Tucson tentative plat submitted for review dated March 1, 2004.

The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along Drexel Road proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans.



Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tep.com
Office: (520) 917-8479
Pager: (520) 218-6565
Fax: (520) 917-8400
04/07/2004 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to match the subdivision design of the tentative plat. Revise all plans as necessary to meet the requirements of the Land Use Code and Development Standards.

Resubmittal of all plans is required.
04/08/2004 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is March 10, 2005.

2. All lettering and dimensions must be the equivalent of (.12) point or greater in size.
D.S. 2-03.2.1.C

3. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers within the location map.
D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2

4. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-028. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans.
D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1

5. Under general note three (3), please note the applicable land use classification as it is listed under LUC Sec. 2.3.5.2.A. (i.e. Family Dwelling, "I", subject to: Sec. 3.5.7.1.F). If the lots are proposed for manufactured housing, please note the manufactured housing requirements as they are listed under L.U.C. 3.5.7.1.F on the tentative plat.
D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5/ LUC 2.3.5.2.A

6. Add the following general note: "This plat is designed to meet the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) setback zone criteria."
D.S. 2-02.2.2.B.7

7. a) Per D.S. 3-01.2.3.A.1, a minimum 20 foot width is required for two (2) travel lanes in addition to a six (6) foot wide on-street parking space. Cross section shows 24 feet with no on-street parking space labeled and dimensioned. In addition, there is no provision which allows for a one-way street in the Development Standards.
b) Per D.S. 3-01.2.4.D, local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common parking areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision.
c) CC&R's are required for maintenance of private street.
d) Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.B.2, the length of a parallel parking space is 23 feet. Plat shows 20 feet.
D.S. 2-03.2.4.G

8. All existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plat, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. If an easement is to be recorded or abandoned by final plat, please so state.
D.S. 2-03.2.4.J

9. Revise the number of lots listed (86) under the general note 14 to eight (8).


10. Correct the zoning classification for the adjacent property to the west. Correct zoning classification is C-2.

11. Indicate the location and width of driveways for each lot.

12. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas.
D.S. 2-10.3.2.E/ L.U.C. 3.6.1.5

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
04/09/2004 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved no comments.
04/09/2004 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: April 09, 2004

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-028 Acacia Lane: TP

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments.


Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions.
04/09/2004 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied no comments.
04/09/2004 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.:

1. The references cited in note 21 is in the 2003 edition.

2. Parking is to be provided on both sides of the street (DS3-01.2.4.D)

3. Demonstrate how this arrangement will meet driveway spacing requirement of Tucson City Code Chapter 25, Section 38.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
04/12/2004 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Passed
04/12/2004 DOROTHY ROBLES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved no comments.
04/12/2004 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved no comments.
04/12/2004 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application
h
CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S04-028 Acacia Lane 04/09/04

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: N/A

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12TH Avenue/Valencia

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A

COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/07/04

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

(XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( ) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 04/06/04
04/14/2004 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: April 14, 2004
TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator
SUBJECT: Acacia Lane Tentative Plat Engineering Review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach and Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-028

SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, CC&R's, title report, and Hydrology Report were received by Engineering on March 11, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only.

HYDROLOGY REPORT COMMENTS:
1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.4.L.2: The hydrology report does not address retention and detention requirements. Provide a drainage report showing existing and developed conditions and showing that sufficient volumes are provided. Include all required information in the drainage report.
2) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Discuss minimum finished Floor Elevations for lots 1-8. Show that the lowest floor elevations will be at least one foot above adjacent flood elevations.
3) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.7: Assure that proposed basin is not receiving 100-year floodwater from Drexel Road. Show outlet elevation and provide basin, inlet and weir details. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a)
4) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: Submit soils report with infiltration test results that demonstrate the percolation time for the retained stormwater in the proposed basin is less than 12 hours, and discuss in drainage report.
5) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: Show that volume of basin is derived from a basin configuration that includes an access ramp.

TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
6) Tucson Code Chapter 25.38 requires minimum 10-foot driveway widths and 12-foot separation between driveways. Revise the tentative plat to show that driveway widths for all lots meet this section of code.
7) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.4.G: Streets designed at the minimum width, with minimal on-street parking, need clearance for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and, where no alleys are provided, by refuse collection vehicles. If motor vehicles are parked along streets that are not designed to allow for parking, life safety services will be inhibited and, in many situations, blocked. Single family projects should be designed with the understanding that families buying into the project will have the standard family gatherings, such as birthday parties, wedding anniversaries, and similar celebrations. Therefore, all single family projects should be designed with some minimum visitor parking so that gatherings can occur, while providing minimal consideration that life safety services can still be provided. Label on planview the locations of no parking signs - specifically along both sides of street at knuckle to ends of tangents.
8) D.S. 3-01.6.1.H: Provide a no-vehicle access easement for lot 8 along Drexel Road.
9) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.b: Clarify the status of the proposed street. The street must meet the street standard in DS 3-01. Use a cross-section from the development standard. Indicate in the general notes the new miles of public or private streets.
10) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.1.C: Assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or when photographically reduced for recordkeeping purposes. All lettering must be the equivalent of 12 point type or greater.
11) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Clarify whether the Floodplain Limits are proposed or existing. Provide delineations for "EXISTING 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS" and "PROPOSED 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS" on legend. Use a symbol to represent the water surface contour and include the symbol in the legend per D.S. Sec.2-03.2.3.J.3. Water surface contours must be no more than 200 feet apart.
12) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.2.B.1: Update the subdivision case number (S04-028) in the lower right corner of the plat sheets next to the title block.
13) D.S. 2-03.2.1.H: List the contour interval along with the scale and north arrow.
14) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.2.C.2.b: Add a general note stating that "A FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT AND/OR FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION CERTIFICATES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING LOTS: 1-8."
15) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.a: Use the exact wording for the following general note: "ALL PUBLIC ROADS AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS. CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL."
16) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Address the following:
a) Show and label all of the proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments as found or set;
b) Clearly dimension tie to quarter section corner.
17) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.3.B: Provide the following plat boundary line information:
a) Clearly dimension south property line and provide bearing;
b) Clarify the status of the area near the access easement. Is this common area or part of the individual lots.
c) Provide curve data for property lines along street, if applicable.
18) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.3.C: All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status.
19) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Provide the following information regarding the existing public right-of-way for Drexel Road: right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and any sidewalks. Drexel is an MS&R collector. Clearly label existing and future right-of-way widths, curb locations and sidewalk locations.
20) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.3.F: In the legend or in a note, state whether the contours are based on NAVD88 or other datum.
21) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide proposed grades and ground elevations for reference to future grading and site drainage:
a) Provide general proposed grades and spot elevations in streets;
b) Provide typical lot grading detail(s) for drainage.
22) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.7: Proposed project is subject to the AzPDES requirements for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans. Contact Loren Makus, 791-5500 for submittal requirements.
23) D.S. Sec.2-03.2.4.N.1.a. The preliminary sewer layout shall be designed so that manholes will not interfere with street survey monuments. However, survey monuments may be offset from manhole locations if so indicated on the plat.
24) DS Sec.3-01.5.2.A: Clearly show sight visibility triangles
25) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) 14.3.2: The maintenance notes specified in SMDDFM 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs.

LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
26) Layout of subdivision in the landscape plan does not match the tentative plat. Provide a landscape plan that matches the tentative plat.
27) Assure that no proposed plants are blocking or placed on access ramps for basin.

Contact me to set up a meeting. Submit the soils report, revised Drainage Report, revised Landscape Plans, and revised Tentative Plat. The next submittal should address all the above items. To set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1161.

Loren Makus, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Section
Development Services