Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-026
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/20/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/24/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | If the most eastern enclosure of #2 & #7 is designed at 30 degree angle from the north then the entire complex can be serviced from a single pass of the collection vehicle. Recommend that this be considered. |
| 01/31/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Laith Alshami, 01/31/2005 SUBJECT: SEC Houghton/Valencia S04-026, T15S, R15E, SECTION 24 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report on January 20, 2005 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: The Drainage Report is acceptable for Tentative Plat purposes. The following information should be provided in a revised drainage report with the Grading Plan submittal. 1. Address erosion control requirements at the proposed detention basin inlets, outlets and low flow pipes. Provide the design calculations for the erosion control structures and show their locations, material and sizes on the drainage exhibits. 2. Show on the Grading Plan the erosion control structure at detention basin A2 bleed pipe outlet, within the proposed landscape area outside the 30' natural buffer area. 3. Size in the revised Drainage Report and show on the Grading Plan the required sidewalk/walkways scuppers to accommodate the 10-year flows including to roof drainage. Tentative Plat/Development Plan: The Tentative Plat/Development Plan is acceptable and it is recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. Please be advised of the following: 1. Add a general note to the Final Plat which addresses the proposed cross access easements and references the dedication information in the CC & R's. |
| 02/04/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: February 04, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-026 Houghton/Valencia: Resubmittal - Tentative Plat Review CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Due to maintenance considerations and/or a history of poor performance in streetscapes, the following landscape plants shown within the Houghton Greenway are not acceptable: Hesperaloe funifera Cassia artemisioides Leucophyllum laevigatum Salvia greggii Native plants should be used. Acceptable plants include but are not limited to: Larrea tridentata – Creosote Baileya multiradiata – Desert Marigold Penstemon parryi – Parry’s Penstemon Yucca elata – Soaptree Yucca Calliandra eriophylla – Fairy Duster Psilostrophe cooperi – Paperflower Any of the plants used in the Houghton Greenway landscaping between Poorman Rd and Bilby Rd. are acceptable. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/04/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is March 3, 2005. 2. Tentative Plat may not be approved prior to SCZ review and approval. 3. Awaiting Traffic Engineering approval for previous comment regarding number of curb cuts. Previous comment: Since this project is being developed as a "mixed use development", the project must comply with the criteria listed under the definition for "mixed use" under LUC Sec. 6.2.13. The number of curb cuts is limited to two (2) or less, unless a greater number is approved by the City Traffic Engineer or designee. Written approval shall be submitted indicating the proposed number of curb cuts for this project is acceptable. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 02/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/08/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this TP/DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |