Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-026
Review Name: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/14/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SEC HOUGHTON/VALENCIA S04-026 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the final plat submitted for review May 31, 2006. If you have any design questions you can contact the Area Designer, Todd Stockdale at (520) 917-8715 Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 06/16/2006 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/16/2006 O: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Houghton Crossings Office Condominium Park Formerly "SEC Houghton/Valencia" S04-026, T15S, R15E, SECTION 24 RECEIVED: Final Plat and CC & R's on May 31, 2006 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Final Plat: 1. Provide the correct S(YR)- _______ number (D.S. 2-03.6.1.K.). 2. The approved Tentative Plat shows the project gross Area to be 9.6246 acres. The Final Plat shows a 10.00-acre area. Clarify the discrepancy. 3. The Dedication is missing language concerning the reservation of the Common Area for Private Use and convenience of all owners etc. (D.S. 2-03.6.3.). Revise as necessary. 4. Change the "City of Tucson Engineer" under Assurances to "City of Tucson Development Services Engineering Administrator". 5. Verify that a "Beneficiary" Block is not needed for this project (D.S. 2-03.6.3.C.). 6. What is the purpose of the arrow, south of Building B? 7. According to the Title Report, the Easement recorded in Docket 2703, Page 223 is an electrical easement; not a gas easement as shown on the Plat below the words "Valencia Road". Revise as necessary. 8. Easements #6 & #7, as Described in the Title Report, do not appear to be depicted on the Final Plat. Revise. 9. This project is impacted by the regulatory floodplain at the southwest corner of the development. Add a general note that states this fact and the need for a floodplain use permit for any work in the impacted area (D.S. 2-03.6.2.E.). 10. The line that delineates the 30' Natural Landscape Buffer is very light and it is barely visible. 11. The Boundary Line on the plan does not match the line in the Legend. Revise. 12. Since most of the site drainage happens within Common Area "A" including the detention/retention basins and the 100-year floodplain at the southwest corner of the parcel, Common Area "A" should also be dedicated for drainage. Revise the Title Block accordingly. 13. Show the detention/retention areas (within the common areas) in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner (D.S. 2-03.6.4.I.). 14. It is not clear if there should be a cross access easement between Lot 1 and the rest of the development. Clarify and revise as needed (D.S. 2-03.6.4.K.). 15. Show and label the basis of bearing and demonstrate how the subject development ties into the basis of bearing. Verify compliance with the requirements of D.S. 2-03.6.5.A. & C. 16. Indicate whether the distance and bearing between all monuments are measured or calculated as required by (D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.5). 17. In order to expedite the plat review and approval, provide the boundary survey and closure calculations report in accordance with D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.3. 18. Submit a copy of the Assurances package. CC & R's The Drainage Maintenance Section shall address in more details what is involved in the required drainage structures inspection. The Section shall also specify the frequency of the inspection (usually once a year and after a major storm). The Drainage Maintenance Section shall incorporate all the requirements that were included in the drainage structures maintenance checklist in the subject project approved drainage report. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Final Plat and Condominium Declaration, and Assurances |
| 06/27/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: June 27, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S04-026 SEC Houghton/Valencia T151524 (141-17) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 06/27/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-026 HOUGHTON CROSSING OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PARK/FINAL PLAT DATE: JUNE 27, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Building letters to Building numbers per Pima County Code. Correct Unit Numbers per Pima County Code. Label 1st floor units with 100 series, and 2nd floor with 200 series (see attachment). The Building number is not part of the unit number. Correct Unit Numbers in Title Block. jg PIMA COUNTY CODE: ADDRESS STANDARDS 18.83.040 5)Condominiums: a)Condominium developments shall be assigned a situs address for each building. b)Individual living facilities in each building shall be assigned occupant identifiers (unit numbers): First floor units shall have 100 series numbers, second floor units shall have 200 series numbers, and additional floors shall be numbered accordingly. |
| 06/30/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 28, 2006 To: Kenneth Perry, Stantec Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Houghton Crossings Office Condominium Park Lot 1, Buildings A-F and Common Area "A" (fka SEC Houghton/Valencia Commercial Plaza Lots 1-4) Final Plat - 1st Submittal S04-026 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The previous Sewer Service Agreement, sent to your office by Dickie Fernandez , dated November 1, 2005, are for a development plan and should disregarded now that this project is being submitted as a final plat. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a revised Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed 1 commercial lot and 6 commercial buildings. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the final plat. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S04-026, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Remove this number from the references heading. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 2: There is no public sewers or existing public sewer easements on this project parcel. Revise all of the labels that describe the easement with Dkt. 12744, Pg. 2066 so that: The easement is correctly identified. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 07/13/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/14/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S05-099 Sunset Pointe at Midvale Park: Tentative Plat Review - No comment. |
| 07/18/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S04-026 Houghton Crossings Office Condominium Park Final Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 17, 2006 DUE DATE: June 27, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before January 25, 2007. 2. For consistency with the approved tentative plat document, revise the location map on the final plat to match the location map on the tentative plat. Label any or all W.A.S.H ordinance washes within the one square mile area of the location map. DS 2-03.6.1.D 3. Per a discussion with Matt Flick of the Engineering Section, it would be best if lot 1 was labeled as Block "A". Also a separate note should be added to the plat that states that a separate submittal of a development plan for review and approval by the City of Tucson is required for Block "A", subject to compliance with conditions of rezoning case C9-00-27. Also per a discussion with Elizabeth Eberbach The detention basin should be designated with a separate common area designation due to specific maintenance requirements. DS 2-03.6.4.C Building "A" per the approved tentative plat indicates that a bank with at least three drive-through lanes is proposed. The drive-through lanes and stacking lane are exclusive to the bank and should be designated as a limited use element or exclusive use element. In addition, if uses on the site are to change from what was approved on the preliminary development plan please verify with Dan Castro of the DSD Rezoning Section that the changes are minor and do not require Mayor and Council approval due to any possible changes. DS 2-03.6.H 4. Please add the subdivision case number S04-026 in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. DS 2-03.6.1.K 5. The gross site area listed on the final plat does not match the area listed on the tentative plat. Please clarify why the area has increased and does the tentative plat need to be revised to ensure consistency with the final plat. DS 2-03.6.2.A 6. Per comment 3, if the lot number is changed to Block "A" please revise general note number 2. DS 2-03.6.2.B 7. General note 5 must be revised to correctly state the area that is to be rezoned. Based on the note on the final plat the proposed zoning is for lot 2, 3, and 4. Due to changes in the plan I can not verify where lot 2, 3, and 4 are located. Please revise the note accordingly. Also, revise general note number 6 to state verbatim what ids listed in development standards 2-03.6.2.D. DS 2-03.6.2.D 8. Under the Approval text block, list the city clerks name. DS 2-03.6.3.D 9. Show detention/retention areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner. DS 2-03.6.4.I 10. Please add a matrix table that lists the volumes of each proposed unit. It is acknowledged that the units may change areas or volumes may change based on tenant. Also list the square footages of all common areas/common elements, limited common elements and /or exclusive etc in this matrix table. 11. Staff suggests that the title of the project be revised to correctly define the use of the site. Per the title on the plan sheets the development is to be an office Condominium Park, yet there is not one office listed as a use under general note 4. Please re-review and revise as required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S04026fp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat, and additional requested documents. |
| 07/21/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 21, 2006 Kenneth D. Perry, PE Stantec Consulting 201 North Bonita Avenue Tucson, AZ 85745 Subject: S04-026 SEC Houghton/Valencia Final Plat Dear Ken: Your submittal of May 31, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Final Plat (Engineering, Addressing, Wastewater, Real Estate, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised CC&R's (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 750-7470 |