Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-024
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/18/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/22/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | Development in the vicinity of the Earp Wash is subject to the provisions of Chapter 29 of the Tucson City Code. Provide a plant/habitat inventory and mitigation plan per Sec 29-15(b)(2)., 29-16(b)(1). IF THE INVENTORY AND MITIGATION PLAN IS APPROVED NO RESUBMITTAL OF THE TP IS REQUIRED. |
| 06/23/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-024 DESERT POINT ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: June 21, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 07/01/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Pete McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: Desert Point Estates RCP S04-024 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: July 1, 2004 DUE DATE: July 1, 2004 The Zoning Review Section at Development Services verifies that the tentative plat meets the requirements of the Land Use Code, subject to the following requirement. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. Add to a general note 23 that this RCP-4 development is also subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F. This information has been removed since the first submittal of the plat. Should the CDRC recommend approval of the tentative plat, please have the applicant submit sign-off copies for approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 07/06/2004 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | SUBJECT: Desert Point Estates Tentative Plat Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-024 LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 10 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, response letter, soils report, revised Landscape Plan, Landscape response letter, W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report, revised Drainage Report, PCWW documents, title report paperwork and a copy of the differential grading request letter to Ernie Duarte dated May 28, 2004 were received by Engineering on June 18, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items. The W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report is acceptable. However, the differential grading requirement is still outstanding. See attached response letter. Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Tentative Plat according to the following conditions. The Drainage and W.A.S.H. Ordinance Reports were reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. TENTATIVE PLAT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2.4.K & IBC Chap. 36 Sec.13.1: The differential grading letter of engineering justification was received in the submittal package. Procedures for differential grading outlined in this section shall apply and notification responses shall be submitted. As conditional approval the Tentative Plat, this issue must be promptly addressed. Procedures for differential grading outlined in this section shall apply. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C&6.4.I: Retention/detention areas must be shown in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner. The 100-year ponding limits of the basins shall be labeled with surveyable data. 3) DS Sec.2.4.J: OHE at north side of project shall be clarified on the grading plan to clearly show that the poles are not impacted by any proposed cut slopes for the proposed channels. 4) DS Sec.2.4.K&10-02.14.2.6: The geotechnical recommendations for proposed minimum setbacks for basins from proposed structures (house foundations) shall be shown on the Grading Plan. 5) Per DS Sec.2-03.2.2.G.2, a copy of certification letter from the Arizona Department of Water Resources will be submitted at first submittal of Final Plat. If you have any further questions, or would like to set up a meeting, you may call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Service ======= DATE: July 1, 2004 TO: Michael Zimmerman, Senior Designer Castro Engineering, LLC 3580 West Ina Road, Suite 200 Tucson Arizona 85741 SUBJECT: S04-024 Desert Point Estates Subdivision Differential Grading Review Michael: This letter is in response to your written justification for proposal to exceed the differential grading limits for lot 20 within the proposed Desert Point Estates project boundaries. As set forth in the Tucson Code Section 6-34, adopted grading ordinance International Building Code Chapter 36 Section 13.1, the Director of Development Services Center or his assignee provides written consent after the justification is submitted. The engineering reasons, including elevations for maintaining the existing drainage patterns, appear to meet technical justification for grading as described in the letter dated May 28, 2004. We have not at this time reviewed any notification response letters submitted to date; if the notification has not already been done, please prepare and send notification for neighboring residential properties within 100 feet of the proposed lot 20 per the differential grading procedure. Copies of notification of the fill site shall also be sent to the Council Office and the Director of Development Services Department. Said notification shall include reference to this ordinance, the justification presented as the basis for the excess fill, the approval letter from Development Services Department, and the name, address, & phone number of the owner/developer as well as the engineer of record. After responses to the notification letters, it may be necessary to prepare a mitigation plan (i.e. additional setbacks, terracing, enhanced buffering/landscaping, etc.) acceptable to a simple majority of the notified property owners. The acceptability of the mitigation plan by the notified property owners must be documented. A condition of this letter of permission includes maintaining the restriction of lot 20 to a one-story building. If you have any questions, contact Elizabeth Eberbach at 791-5550, extension 2204. Sincerely, Jim Vogelsberg, PE Engineering Division Administrator Development Services Department City of Tucson c: Ernie Duarte |
| 07/07/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.: 1. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to the point directly opposite the PRC perpendicular to the roadway centerline. See DS 3-01 figure 21. Irrespective of the note concerning guest parking locations on sheet 1, don't show the guest parking in this area as is done on Big Game Place. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/07/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering has received via fax, corrections to my last comments. Deficiencies have been addressed to my satisfaction and now recommend APPROVAL of this TP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/08/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 08, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, S04-024 Desert Point Estates: RE TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Approved. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/16/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/16/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-024 Desert Point Estates 06/18/04 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-99-25 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: None (General Plan) GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/01/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (x) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 3/19/04 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 6/29/04 |