Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S04-024
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S04-024
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/01/2004 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/02/2004 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved 03/02/04.
03/03/2004 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S04-024 DESERT POINT ESTATES/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: March 3, 2004



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Correct Terra Vista, Phase I, Book 58, Page 38 to Tierra Vista, Phase I, Book 56, Page 38.

2.) Correct Desert Vista Estates, Bk. 50, Pg. 9 (west of Alvernon Way, sheets 4 & 5) to Tierra Vista, Phase I, Bk. 56, Pg. 38.
03/19/2004 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: Desert Point Estates
Lots 1-76
S04-024

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the City of Tucson
tentative plat submitted for review dated February 27, 2004.

The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing
overhead facilities west of the subdivision along Alvernon Way. Enclosed is
a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit
numbers of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable
to the developer.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative
Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat sent in by
the City of Tucson. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the
design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk
and paving plans.



Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tep.com
Office: (520) 917-8479
Pager: (520) 218-6565
Fax: (520) 917-8400
03/19/2004 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Transportation Information for Rezoning,
Subdivision and Development Review Requests
File Number Description Date Reviewed
E
Pima Association of Governments
Transportation Planning Division
177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405
Tucson, AZ 85701
Phone: (520) 792-1093
Fax: (520) 792-9151
www.pagnet.org
S04-024 Desert Point Estates 3/16/2004
1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street
2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Planned Action:
STREET IDENTIFICATION
3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic
4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E”
5. Existing Number of Lanes
9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development
(Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips)
8. Future Number of Lanes
TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS
10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance)
11. Existing or Planned Bikeway
Remarks:
Street Number 1 Street Number 2
Year Year
Planned Action:
VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS
6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed
7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E”
Alvernon Way (Benson Hghwy to
Valencia)
No 0
16,692
43,000
4
43,000
18,356
4
727
Route 26, 30 Minutes, 0 miles
Planned bike route with striped shoulder
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
03/22/2004 MARILYN KALTHOFF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond March 22, 2004

TO: Wocky Redsar
Castro Engineering

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson Development Services

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Desert Point Estates an RCP Subdivision Lots 1-76 and Common Areas A & B
Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal
S04-024

The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Mr. Robert Decker of PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at (520) 740-6625.

2. ALL SHEETS. Add the subdivision plat case number, S04-024, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

3. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

4. Based on the number of lots, a Sewer Service Agreement will be prepared during the Final Plat process.

5. Per Pima County Standard Details WWM A-3 and WWM 109-111, it is required that public sewer easements be designed accordingly to allow access at all times by Pima County WWM maintenance vehicles. Please follow these guidelines for the design of the public sewer easements provided for this project.

6. Include all existing sewer information within 100 feet of the project boundary. For sewer lines, include sewer size and Pima County plan number. For manholes, include manhole number, rim elevation and invert elevation.

7. Subject to the above, this project is hereby approved.

If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6947.





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

Copy: Project

DF/df
03/23/2004 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S04-024 Desert Point Estates 03/22/04

(X) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-99-25

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: None (General Plan)

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO

COMMENTS DUE BY: 3/29/04

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
(X) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 3/19/04

Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments
Community Planning and Preservation Section
S0-024- Desert Point Estates Tentative Plat
March 19, 2004


Staff offers the following comments

1. Please revise tentative plat; sheet 2 of 5 to include all language as approved by Mayor and Council on rezoning case C999-25. As shown condition # 1 is missing the introduction paragraph, therefore its incomplete and condition # 19 has been omitted in error.

2. Please revise tentative plat to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 4, which requires the construction of a six-(6) foot wide sidewalk along Alvernon Way.
03/25/2004 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

RICK LYONS
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: March 25, 2004


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S04-024 Desert Point Estates T151419 (140-32)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.







Susan C. King
03/25/2004 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved All lots can be serviced from the front of the respective lots be Environmental Services.
03/26/2004 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Center
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
Desert Point Estates RCP
S04-024
Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL: March 26, 2004
DUE DATE: March 29, 2004

1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before February 28, 2005.
LUC 4.1.7.1

2. Fill in the S04-024 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. Also, add the annexation case, C15-88-1, to these reference numbers in the lower right hand corner.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

3. Add to a general note 24 that this RCP-4 development is also subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.E.
LUC 2.3.6.2.A.3

4. Revise comment 26 by combining the words "north" and "east" to read as one word: "northeast", since the properties directly to the east and north are zoned R-3 and R-1 respectively.

5. Revise the project location map to show and label the Tucson City Limits line, which runs through the area shown.
DS 2-03.2.1.D

6. Revise RCP data note 4 on sheet 2 of 5 regarding the maximum building height to specify compliance with rezoning condition 1.A as it applies to the row of lots fronting on Atrim Loop Road.

7. Add an RCP data note to which details the requirements of LUC 3.6.1.4.H regarding completion of project amenities and site improvements.
LUC 3.6.1.4.H

8. Provide a note stating the maximum proposed building heights on the tentative plat. Site perimeter setbacks may not be verified until building heights are specified.
DS 2-10.3.1.A
LUC 3.2.6.4

9. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of LUC 3.6.1.5 and DS 2-03.6.6.
DS 2-10.3.2.E
LUC 3.6.1.5

10. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 11 by labeling the required walls on the plat and stating their proposed height.
DS 2-05.2.4.U

11. Revise rezoning conditions on sheet 2 of 5 to be complete and correct as approved by Mayor & Council for case C9-99-25. Add condition # 18.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.3

12. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans.
DS 2-07.2.1.A


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
03/26/2004 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: March 26, 2004

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S04-024 Desert Point Estates: TP

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Please indicate/show the following regarding the Earp Wash Trail:
The trail shall be constructed in a landscaped(trees, shrubs, desert seed) corridor along the south side of Earp Wash.
A buffer area a minimum of 10' in width shall be maintained from the back of the closest wall to the southern edge of the trail.
The trail shall be a minimum of 8 ft wide.
The trail shall be ADA accessible and all-weather.
All drainages crossing the trail shall be directed below ground at least 12" below the trail.
Show curb ramps where the trail meets Antrim Loop road.
The trail shall be constructed to the following specification: two(2) inch thickness, stabilized decomposed granite(1/4" minus) compacted to 95% over native subgrade compacted to 95%.
Trail shall be located a safe distance from the edge of detention basins and drop-offs - or - a safety railing shall be installed.
Walls along the trail corridor should be see-thru "view walls" constructed of wrought iron and masonry.

Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions.
03/29/2004 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Development in the vicinity of the Earp Wash is subject to the provisions of Chapter 29 of the Tucson City Code. Provide a plant/habitat inventory and mitigation plan per Sec 29-15(b)(2)., 29-16(b)(1)....
03/31/2004 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.:

1. Add a general note to read "all non-signalized intersections street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways."

2. No parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to the point directly opposite the PRC. Show no parking signs on the plat.


D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
04/02/2004 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S04-024
CASTRO ENGINEERING CORP
DESERT POINT ESTATES
04/05/2004 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Desert Point Estates Tentative Plat Engineering Review Submittal
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S04-024
LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 10

SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report, drainage report, and title report paperwork were received by Engineering on March 1, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat at this time. The Drainage and W.A.S.H. Ordinance Reports were reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only.

TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-03.2.1.D.2: Revise reference for recorded subdivision plat Book 47 and Page 2 at lower right corner of location map to Book 57 page 42.
2) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A: Remove "PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OR RECORDING" from each sheet. Provide seal with signature for the professional engineer that prepared the plat.
3) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Provide the following for the legend on sheet 1:
a) Provide symbol for lot corner pins;
b) Symbol for water surface elevation interval;
c) Provide symbol for finished pad elevation, or, finished floor elevation with reference to slab height.
4) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.A: Provide seal with signature for the professional engineer that prepared the plat.
5) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Add a general note stating that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for: LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; as well as LUC Sec. 3.6.1, Residential Cluster Project (RCP); and Tucson Code Sec. 29-12 through 29-19 Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) Ordinance. Where the overlay zone requires a separate review process, note the case file number, date of approval, and any conditions placed on that approval or, if the review has not been completed, that it is in process.
6) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.C.3: Add a note referencing all lots impacted by the W.A.S.H. ordinance, and state that the plat is designed to comply with the regulation.
7) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.C.2.b: List the lots affected by the Earp floodplain by lot number. Add the following note and complete the blanks: "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: ____."
8) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.G.2: Per General Note 11, this subdivision is not within the planned water service area of the Tucson Water Department but is within a service area designated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources as having an assured water supply. Submit copy of certification letter from the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
9) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C&E: All existing easements and utilities will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, sizes, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Check to see that all easements listed in Title Report are shown and indicated on the Tentative Plat.
10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F: Provide a local basis of elevation on site.
11) Label more contour intervals on plan views.
12) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J & 2.4.L.6: On plan view on sheet 4, indicate on plan view, the delineations for the 100-year Floodplain Limits. Label elevations for water surface contour intervals.
13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.B: Check configuration for Lot 9 to assure space for building and setbacks.
14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C&6.4.I: Retention/detention areas must be shown in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner. The 100-year ponding limits of the basins shall be labeled with surveyable data. The basin areas, labeled as Common Areas "B" "DRAINAGE" on the Tentative Plat, need clarification. In the Title Block, the common area descriptions and the basin area need to be differentiated; label the basin areas exclusively as "RETENTION / DETENTION BASIN" and label the other areas (such as channels) as "DRAINAGE". At minimum this will need to be addressed at Final Plat stage.
15) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Label interior streets as "PRIVATE" per Rezoning Condition 24. Revise detail B on sheet 2.
16) DS Sec.2.4.H: Label Alvernon Way as "MS&R".
17) DS Sec.2.4.J: Clarify width of easement for the OHE at north side of project. Add width to detail B on sheet 3.
18) DS Sec.2.4.K & IBC Chap. 36 Sec.13.1: Pad (of finished floor?) elevation for the lot 20 along the east site boundary does not meet grading standards. Pad grade shall be changed to meet two-foot differential limit, otherwise the procedures for differential grading outlined in this section shall apply and written justification based on engineering / technical reasons shall be submitted as first step in the procedure.
19) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L&M: Address the following drainage-related comments per this section:
a) On plan view on sheet 4, show setback from 100-year Floodplain Limits based on Rezoning Condition 1.d;
b) On sheet 3, clarify location of section E/3. Show adjacent pedestrian path and Earp Wash in section;
c) Provide basin information including depth and freeboard for details E and F on sheet 3;
d) Provide detail for dimensioned depths of pipe beneath trail for any stormwater drainage;
e) Provide cross section on Tentative Plat between rear of lots across Earp Wash. In the section, provide wash depth of flow, elevations of drainage outlet inverts, dimension between trail and any pipes, and widths of wash trails, maintenance or other easements, etc.
20) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.J: Add rezoning conditions 19 and 24 on sheet 2 as approved by Mayor & Council for case C9-99-25.
21) DS Sec.3-01.3.3.C: Depict on planview on sheets 4 and 5, wheelchair ramps at street intersections.
22) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: Depict on planview the security barriers (acceptable fencing, vegetation, or, combination of vegetation and structural materials) that will be provided for each basin.
23) Tucson Code (TC) Section 29-15: Delineate the allocated W.A.S.H. Ordinance 50-foot Study Area as well as the Resource Area on plan view for Tentative Plat sheets 4 and 5.
24) DS Sec.2.4.K&10-02.14.2.6: Provide a soils report regarding suitability and feasibility of the project; the report should discuss existing geotechnical conditions, and proposed recommendations for foundations and pavement design. Also include recommendations for slope grades and minimum distances from foundations. The report shall have minimum setbacks for basins from structures. Infiltration test results will be required to be submitted. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Infiltration rates shall meet Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria per DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a.
25) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Clarify "TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE" detail A on sheet 2:
a) Assure that the detail complies with recommendations of soils report.
b) Clarify how distances for minimum setbacks provide appropriate area for drainage swales, mechanical equipment, A/C units, slope setbacks for screen walls, slope run-outs, and general access.
c) Provide in detail the general / typical high point elevation or grade break locations as it relates to the finished pad elevation, as well as minimum flow grades around building pads.
26) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.7: Revise lot drainage for lots 36 through 48 to reflect compliance with Rezoning Condition 8. Specifically revise drainage design for these lots on sheets 4 and 5 to maximize water harvesting.
27) DS Sec.3-01.5.1: Provide general note on Tentative Plat for restriction of existing or proposed structures on lots 1, 2, and 36 within 30" to 72" in height within the sight visibility triangles.
28) Explain in response letter and provide status of compliance on Tentative Plat for each of the following Rezoning Conditions: 3, 13, 14, and 15.
29) Explain purpose of general note 21.
30) Complete keynote 15 on sheet 5.
31) Clarify "TOP/TOE" for end of channel elevations on sheet 4.
32) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.H: Show no-vehicular access easements along appropriate perimeter boundary lines.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:
33) DS Sec.2-03.4.4: In the "EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN" section of the W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report, it was stated that the culvert Alvernon box culverts are in need of maintenance. It is advisable to notify Pima County for maintenance, if Earp Wash is in need of attention.
34) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Determine setback from 100-year Floodplain Limits based on rezoning condition 1d. Provide section in Drainage Report discussing compliance with Rezoning Condition 1.d.
35) DS Sec.10-02.L.2.3.1.5.B: Provide discussion and explain assumptions for hydraulic grade line computation in report.
36) DS Sec. 10-02.L.2.3.1.5.E: Discuss assumptions and results for hydraulic calculations for determining 100-year Floodplain Limits. Label elevations for water surface contour intervals.
37) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Clarify / explain "as directed by C.O.T. Drainage Review" for the purpose of bleeder pipes on page 14 of the drainage report. Percolation testing must be performed and infiltration results submitted for review per to acceptance of bleeder pipes.
38) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.7: Revise Drainage Report Figure 7 to reflect compliance with Rezoning Condition 8.
39) Explain in Drainage Report and show compliance on Tentative Plat for each of the following Rezoning Conditions 6 and 7.

W.A.S.H. ORDINANCE REPORT:
40) Tucson Code (TC) Section 29-15(b)(1): Address the following comments for W.A.S.H. Ordinance compliance:
a) Per this section, provide complete discussions in the W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report regarding any effects on hydrology and hydraulics to the 50-foot Study Area due to the elements as outlined in section 29-15(b)(1) a through i. In order to easily review the report each of these sections a through i can be addressed separately by section letter.
b) Clarify delineation of the Resource Area on sheet W1 in the W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report, and delineate the Resource Area on sheet 1 of the W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report Exhibit.
c) TC Sec.29-16(b)(1): In W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report provide discussion of proposed mitigation conforming to this section of code for the disturbance of the resource area.
d) Per TC Sec.29-16(b)(1)b, explain whether this project needs to go in front of Mayor and Council for approval of concrete outlet structures from drainageway near lot 22 and basins in W.A.S.H. wash. Otherwise, provide alternative designs for these outlets to prevent erosion.
41) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1 & TC Sec.29-15(b)(1)c: It was stated in the W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report that the required access for maintenance has been provided. All drainageways, whether or not they are maintained by the City of Tucson, require unobstructed access / maintenance easements (16 to 20 feet wide) to the drainage channels and basins.
42) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.C.3: Determine and state which lots are impacted by the W.A.S.H. ordinance.

LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
43) DS Sec.3-01.5.1: Address the following Landscape Plan comments:
a) Show the sight visibility triangle on sheet L5;
b) Provide notation on Landscape Plan for restriction of existing or proposed structures within 30" to 72" in height within the sight visibility triangles;
c) Sheet L6 shows mesquites and acacia proposed within SVT's. Clarify.
d) Re-label sheet L6;
e) On sheets L2 and L5, assure that no proposed plants are blocking or placed on access ramps for basins;
f) Lots 1, 20, 49 show a wall within the sight visibility triangles. Revise wall location.
44) Provide jogs in wall per Rezoning Condition 12.

The next submittal should include a sealed and signed Tentative Plat, revised W.A.S.H. / Drainage Report, revised Landscape Plans, soils report, Pima County wash maintenance acceptance document, Arizona Department of Water Resources certification letter, and should address all the above items. If you have any further questions, or would like to set up a meeting, you may call me at 791-5550 extension 2204.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services
04/05/2004 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection
04/06/2004 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Approved NO COMMENTS.