Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-016
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/23/2004 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: PASEO ESTRELLA Lots 1-105 S04-016 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the City of Tucson tentative plat submitted for review dated April 19, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along 21st Street and 24th Street proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. As you are aware, there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, paving and driveway placements. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 04/23/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-016 PASEO ESTRELLA/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: April 21, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: Add See Sheet 2 on pg. 3. 2.) Label approved interior street names. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 05/03/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is February 19, 2005. 2. Since a DSMR will be applied for, please note the DSMR case number, date of approval, modifications granted, and any conditions imposed. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G/ LUC Sec. 3.2.8.3.B/ D.S. 3-01 3. Under general note 22, correct typo "modivsation". In addition, revise "Planning Director" to "Development Services Director." LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5/ D.S. 2-10.3.1.D If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/03/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this T.P. There are no traffic issues involved in this submittal of this Plat, however, some things the consultant may wish to look at before submitting a Mylar set: 1. Why is there a section/detail F? I can find no such section line on the plan set. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/04/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/04/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Based on clarification of combined storage or individual storage at the residence. |
| 05/04/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-016 Starr Pass 05/04/04 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan & the Kroeger Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/3/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions (x) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 5/3/04 |
| 05/11/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT has requested the engineering firm to submit an analysis on the impact of this development on the operation of I-10 and 22nd St., as of this submittal we have not received any information. ADOT has plans to rebuild the structure in the interchange in the near future with no modifications to the off ramp. ADOT would like to have a document on file stating the development will have no adverse affects on the traffic on I-10 mainline or backups on the ramp. The City needs to address this issue because the level of service will diminish on 22nd St. with the impact of this development. |
| 05/12/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 12, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus Engineering Division SUBJECT: PASEO ESTRELLA LOTS 1-105 AND COMMON AREAS Tentative Plan S04-016 (Second Review) T14S, R13E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat. The Tentative Plat (TP) has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Tentative Plat: 1. As proposed, lots 63 and 95-105 are in violation of the differential grading requirements of the grading ordinance. (Section 13 of the grading ordinance) All of the requirements including neighborhood notification of the section 13 must be met before the Tentative Plat can be approved. The requirements are: 1) Written justification based on engineering/technical reasons. 2) Written permission of the Director of the Development Services Center (DSC) or his/her assignee. 3) Notification of the property owner(s) adjacent to the fill site (with copies to the Council Office and the Director of DSC) prior to the approval of a grading plan. Said notification shall include reference to this ordinance, the justification presented as the basis for the excess fill, the approval letter from DSC, and the name, address, & phone number of the owner/developer and the engineer of record. This notification shall occur early in the development process. 4) Preparation of a mitigation plan (i.e. additional setbacks, terracing, enhanced buffering/landscaping, etc.) acceptable to a simple majority of the notified property owners. The acceptability of the mitigation plan by the notified property owner(s) must be documented and made a part of the approved grading plan and permit. If the owner/developer and the notified property owner(s) cannot reach consensus on a mitigation plan within 15 working days of receipt of the mitigation plan by the notified property owners, the Director of DSC shall review the issues and information and then render a final decision. 2. Provide a letter from the operator of the gas line granting permission to use their easement for other utility structures. 3. Lots 2, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 25, 26, 28, 31, 32, 35, 37, 38, 41, 42, 73, 74 77, 78, 81, and 82 do not have the required street frontage for solid waste pick-up. Provide for adequate collection facilities and solid waste vehicle access. (DS 6-01.2.1.B.2) A Floodplain Use Permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required when the Grading Permit is issued. Submit a revised Tentative Plat. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
| 05/19/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 May 14, 2004 TO: Colleen Stetzel, Rick Engineering THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Paseo Estrella, Lots 1-105 (a.k.a. Starr Pass, Lots 1-105) - Submittal S04-016 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use: SHEET 2. Provide a 35 foot return radius for the public sewer easement as outlined within PC/COT Standard Detail WWM 109. SHEET 1. Add a general note that reads “THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN COMMON AREA B-2 AND ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4.” Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided on the previous page. Copy: Project |