Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-016
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/20/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/26/2004 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 15, 2004 TO: Colleen Stoetzel Rick Engineering THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Starr Pass Lots 1-105 and Common Areas A, B1-B4, C1-C3, D & E1-E4 Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S04-016 The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southwest Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Mr. Robert Decker of PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at (520) 740-6625. ALL SHEETS. Add the subdivision plat case number, S04-016, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. Based on the number of lots, a Sewer Service Agreement will be prepared during the Final Plat process. SHEET 1. Include the project reference numbers C9-03-7 and CR-03-19 to the title block. SHEET 1. Revise the location map description to read “T 14 S, R 13 E.” instead of “T 13 S, R 14 E”. SHEETS 2 & 3. Label proposed manholes as “NEW” and assign a number to each proposed manhole. SHEETS 2 & 3. Revise the public sewer design for 8-inch sewer lines. Per Pima County design standards, the minimum slope for an 8-inch sewer line is 0.44 percent with the exception of this slope having to be at least 1.00 percent when leaving a terminal manhole. SHEETS 3. Revise the minimum 4 feet of cover to be provided. Manhole rim and invert elevations are below 4 feet at manholes located near Common Area C1, lots 1, 7, 8 and 71 as well as the manholes within detail C. SHEETS 2 & 3. For the existing sewer lines within 100 feet of the project site, the following sewer information is required: Sewer line size Pima County plan number Manhole number Manhole rim elevation Manhole invert elevation SHEET 1-3. The symbol used in the legend for existing sewer lines and manholes is not consistent with the existing layout shown on Sheets 2 & 3. Please revise accordingly. SHEET 2 & 3. Keynote 2 should read “PUBLIC UTILITY, PRIVATE SEWER, PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS AND PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY FINAL PLAT.” ALL SHEETS. General Note 9b indicates that streets will be public, however the layout on Sheets 2 & 3 indicates that streets will be private. Please clarify. We will require a complete set of revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. The review fee is $50 per revised sheet for the second submittal. The second submittal will include 3 revised sheets and a check for $150.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of revised sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6947. Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) Copy: Project DF/df |
| 02/26/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S04-016 STARR PASS / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: February 26, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Correct T13S, R14E to T14S, R13E in Location Map. 2: Spell out Boulevard for Starr Pass on all sheets. 3: Label approved interior street names on Final Plat. 4: Is road easement in lot 96 to be abandoned? Question: Are there any existing structures on this property that will remain? If so, What addresses are being used? |
| 03/09/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | From: John E. Clark PE, RLS Engineering Project Manger City of Tucson Environmental Services POINTS OF CONCERN/INTEREST FOR CLARIFICATION: It is assumed that refuse service for lots not directly fronting on the private street shall be through the proposed easement connecting such lots to the provate street. This needs to be clarified through the CCR's of the development and clarified or shown on the tentative plat. A hold harmless agreement for damage that maybe caused to the Private Street by utilization of such streets is required per the Development Standards Section 6. |
| 03/10/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: STARR PASS Lots 1-105 S04-016 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the City of Tucson tentative plat dated February 19, 2004. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. A copy of the plat and a copy of a facilities map indicating the approximate location of the existing facilities are enclosed. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. TEP's approval of the tentative plat is necessary if you request a preliminary electrical design prior to the signed Approved Tentative Plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, paving and driveway placements. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 03/15/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a Plant/Habitat Inventory and Mitigation Plan per TCC Ch. 29. 2) Submit a complete native plant inventory, including viability ratings. If none of the protected plants are viable then no additional mitigation will be required. LUC 3.8 |
| 03/16/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: March 15, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S04-016 Starr Pass T131414&23 (116-23&118-08) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections. The township and range in the location map is different from the title block. Remove the hatching. And bearings for the lot lines, dimensions and bearings for the street centerlines and the complete curve data. Add the over-all perimeter bearings and dimensions. Add the section tie. There are already a number of plats named Starr Pass; please add a “IV” (there are already a I, II, and III) or some other change that will show a differentiation between your subdivision and the others. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 03/16/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is February 19, 2005. 2. Identify major watercourses (i.e. Santa Cruz River) and reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers within the location map. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2 3. This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S04-016. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. a) Common Area "C-4" located in the southeast corner of the subdivision on sheet 3 of 3 is not included in the title block. b) The title block lists one common area (Common Area "A") within the subdivision and two are actually shown on the plat (Common Area "A-1" and "A-2"). Please include both common areas with separate letter designations in the title block. D.S. 2-03.2.4.C 5. Since this is a Cluster Development with density increase, please demonstrate compliance with LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B. Documentation may be required to verify compliance. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.3.B 6. a) Since lots located north of Starr Pass Blvd. are also included in the R-1 RCP-4 "bonus density", commonly owned recreation facilities are required for the north of Starr Pass. The recreation facilities located south of Starr Pass Blvd are not considered "conveniently located" for the residences north of Starr Pass Blvd. b) Please show the location and type of recreation facilities to be provided for all recreation areas within the subdivision. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.2 7. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.8.3.B, access provided by an easement to more than three (3) single-family homes will require the easement to be developed as a street. Refer to D.S. 3-01 for street development standards. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G/ LUC Sec. 3.2.8.3.B/ D.S. 3-01 8. Barrier-free accessibility must be provided to twenty-five percent of the ground floor units and all common areas within the project. In addition, label those units which are proposed for barrier free accessibility on the plat. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5/ D.S. 2-10.3.1.D 9. Under the Tabulations block for R-1 zoning on sheet 1 of 3, please correct the square footage for drives to 24, 928 S.F. (328 x 76 = 24,928). Revise the total square footage for site coverage and 25% common area calculation. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.B 10. Provide typical plot plan layouts for lots sharing ingress/egress. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B 11. Under the Tabulations block for R-1 zoning on sheet 1 of 3 the maximum allowed density is labeled incorrectly. Revise maximum allowed density to 6.25. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.B 12. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. D.S. 2-10.3.2.E/ L.U.C. 3.6.1.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/18/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 18, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus Engineering Division SUBJECT: STARR PASS LOTS 1-105 AND COMMON AREAS Tentative Plan S04-016 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. The following review comments must be addressed prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Provide general cross sections at boundaries showing change of grades and showing how proposed grades match existing grades inside the property lines. 2. Label and describe the proposed disposition for the existing structures shown on the tentative plat. 3. As proposed, lots 63 and 95-105 are in violation of the differential grading requirements of the grading ordinance. (Section 13 of the grading ordinance) 4. Label more intermediate contours so that depth of fill can be determined for all boundary lots and common areas. 5. Revise the general notes to clearly state the total miles of new public streets and the number of miles of new private streets. (DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b) 6. Provide a letter from the operator of the gas line operator granting permission to use their easement for other utility structures. 7. Provide recordation information for the abandonment of the "Road Easement." 8. Provide "No Vehicle Access Easements" at all boundary lots adjacent to rights-of-way and at all locations where the common spaces meet the private streets. 9. Add a note stating that a Floodplain Use Permit will be required for the development. (DS 2-03.2.2.C.2) 10. Provide details for all outlet structures. (DS 2-03.2.4.L.2) 11. Provide the required boundary data for the project on sheet 3. (DS 2-03.2.3.B) 12. Provide details for the water harvest areas. (DS 2-03.2.4.L.3) 13. Lots 2, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 25, 26, 28, 31, 32, 35, 37, 38, 41, 42, 73, 74 77, 78, 81, and 82 do not have the required street frontage for solid waste pick-up. Provide for adequate collection facilities and solid waste vehicle access. (DS 6-01.2.1.B.2) 14. Provide recorded covenants which relieve the City of Tucson from any responsibility for structural damage to the private streets by solid waste collection vehicles. (DS 6-01.2.2.D.4) 15. Provide proposed ground elevation at different points on each lot or provide typical lot grading details. Also show proposed elevations in common areas(DS 2-03.2.4.L) 16. Show and label all existing and proposed utility easements. Include a description of the purpose of each easement and whether it is public or private. Include pipe sizes for each applicable utility. (DS 2-03.2.4.J) 17. Provide a valid pad elevation for Lot 66. Drainage Report: 18. In order to discharge directly into the Old Julian Wash without retention, there must be no adverse impact on any properties upstream or downstream of the project. Revise the drainage report to show that the downstream culvert can handle the increased discharge without a significant increase in water surface elevation. DS 2-03.2.3.J 19. Figure 5 of the drainage report shows that discharges at points 2 and 3 have a greater volume and are more concentrated than existing flows. Show how that the discharges will be dispersed in order to maintain existing drainage patterns. 20. Provide notarized letters from the owners of adjacent properties accepting the additional discharges. 21. On page 4 of the drainage report, revise the description of "Shaded" Zone X. In the Tucson area, all areas protected by levees are labeled on the FIRM panels. 22. Revise references to 22nd Street in the drainage report to refer to Starr Pass Boulevard. (For example, page 4) A Floodplain Use Permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required when the Grading Permit is issued. Submit a revised TP, a revise DR and a soils report. Include a $150 drainage review fee and a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or lmakus1@ci.tucson.az.us. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
| 03/22/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P. 1. Add a general note to read "All non-signalized intersection street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways." 2. no parking is allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to the point directly across the street from the PRC (not the point where the curb goes tangent again). Move the no parking sign from between lots 95/96 to the lot line between 96/97. 3. label radii of entrance curb returns D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/22/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | * The TIA will analyze the impact of the development on the > interchange (intersection), on and off ramps, frontage roads and arterial > street. > * A queueing analysis, for the ramps, shall be included in the TIA. > * How will the improvements be funded, if any are warranted, ADOT will > not participate in any improvements generated by this development? > * Any improvements to the interchange will be done under a permit from > ADOT and to current ADOT standards. > > > |
| 03/22/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved 02/23/04. |
| 03/22/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 03/22/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 03/24/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 23, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S04-016 Starr Pass : TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 03/24/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-016 Starr Pass 3/24/04 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan & the Kroeger Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 3/18/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 3/18/04 1. Please revise tentative plat to provide and identify appropriate recreational open space(s) with amenities for all ages within the northern portion of this project. Recreational amenities may include but not limited to ramada, tot lot, bbq grill, table/benches, and a passive exercise area. Appropriate open space recreational use area(s) are to provide amenities to all on-site residents. Please revise tentative plat to include pedestrian connectivity on both the northern and southern site. Potential pedestrian corridors may include the El Paso Gas Line easement, as may be approved by authorized representative of the gas line easement and the Police Department for “safe by design” criteria, the Julian Wash area along the eastern edge of this development and the western edge of the northern parcel. Pedestrian link(s) to connect the on-site residential sidewalk with open space recreational amenities and with the Starr Pass Boulevard pedestrian system. The pedestrian link(s) shall provide connectivity onto abutting local streets along the perimeter of both sites. When appropriate, points of access at off-site local street openings shall be secured with ballards to restrict uses other than pedestrian/bicycle use. 3. Please revise tentative plat to identify and provide appropriate recreational open space with amenities for all ages within the southern portion of this project. Recreational amenities may include but not limited to ramada, tot lot, bbq grill, table/benches, and a passive exercise area. Please revise tentative plat to include on the southern site a pedestrian link that connects the on-site residential sidewalk system with the open space recreational amenities, including connectivity onto 24th Street for access to Ormsby Park. When appropriate, entry points of the pedestrian path along the southern edge shall be secured with ballards to restrict uses other than pedestrian/bicycle use. 5. Please revise tentative plat to include a pedestrian crosswalk across Starr Pass Boulevard to provide connectivity for the southern and northern parts of the development. A possible location for the crosswalk is at the point where the two on-site local streets intersect with Starr Pass Boulevard. Crosswalk treatment and location to be determined by Traffic Engineering. Please provide unit (models) elevations that show all exterior mechanical equipment to be screened from view of adjacent development and street frontages, and shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of buildings and development. Please revise tentative plat to show a streetscape-landscaping plan. Trees shall be planted to shade the sidewalk on every other lot. If a decorative perimeter masonry wall is provided along site perimeters, provide a wall detail. Landscape buffer to be located between perimeter walls and perimeter site property lines along street frontages. Landscape buffers to be a minimum of five-(5) foot wide. If perimeter masonry walls are developed, provide pedestrian openings along perimeter points of access, as outlined in condition # 2 & 4. The landscape buffer along all street perimeters shall include 15 gallon, native canopy trees. |