Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S04-015
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/23/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: August 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Presidio Park Central Tentative Plat. The activity number is S04-015. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on August 23, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and recommends approval of the Tentative Plat and the Drainage Report. APPROVAL: TP, DR GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a recent Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section 13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert, 791-5550 for submittal requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal. 8. Prior to building plan submittal, a soils report that address a recommended minimum building setback from the basins is required. See Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6 James C. Tate, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer |
| 08/23/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S04-015 Presidio Park Central 08/20/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant - Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 08/20/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached (x) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 08/06/04 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other: REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 08/20/04 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Presidio Park Central, S04-015 – 3rd submittal The applicant has submitted a tentative plat and landscape plan that adheres to the comments from the third submittal. The Department of Urban Planning and Design staff requests that DSD staff confirm the changes on the mylar. |
| 08/23/2004 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |