Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-036
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/12/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-036 OLSEN CONDOMINIUMS / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: April 9, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Delete letters and renumber Condo Units 101 thru 118. |
| 04/15/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: April 15, 2004 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Olsen Condominiums Tentative Plat. The activity number is S03-036. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on April 9, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat. Engineering recommends approval of the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP APPROVAL: DR GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a recent Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert, 791-5550 for submittal requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal. 8. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Grading Plan approval. 9. In floodplain areas where fill is to be used to raise the elevation of a building site, the building line must be located not less than twenty-five feet land ward from any edge of the fill, unless a study prepared by a registered professional civil engineer shows a lesser distance is acceptable. Tucson Code Chapter 26, Sec 8(d) The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. On Detail A Sheet 3 the northeast parcel corner tie to Olsen Ave. (29.96 ft.) needs a bearing. DS 2-03.2.3.A 2. Each common area must be labeled individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area. Common areas with different uses, maintenance requirements, etc. must have separate designations. The Detention/Retention area must be a separate common area. Common Area "B" on the plan must be differentiated from Common Area "A" on the plan in a readily definable manner (i.e. by solid lines, shading, etc.) Also, the buildings themselves are common area and must be designated as such. DS 2-03.2.4.C Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.4.c 3. Sidewalks within a development must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. The PAAL section shows the sidewalk with a wedge curb. The purpose of the standard is to prevent vehicles from traveling up on to the sidewalk. Wedge curbs do not prevent this. Wedge curbs are designed for vehicles to travel over. Re-design. 4. Page 10 of the Geotech report states, "Retention/Detention basins shall be set back from structures and pavement a distance of at least 15 feet or four times the designed maximum water depth, whichever is greater." The plan shows structures and pavement closer than 15 feet to the basin. Redesign. 5. Provide proposed ground elevations at different points for reference to future grading and drainage. Show proposed drainage patterns. Provide these elevations and drainage patterns for the areas between and behind and alongside the proposed buildings. DS 2-03.2.4.L.4 6. The Drainage Report basin routing shows a weir invert of 1.3 ft. above basin bottom. Sheet 2 specifies the bottom elevation as 84.0 and the weir invert as 86.0. Correct James C. Tate, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer |
| 04/16/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-036 Olsen Condominiums 04/16/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Cragin - Keeling Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: April 21, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 04/14/04 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN Olsen Condominiums S03-036 The Design Guidelines Manual states that shade trees should be located along pedestrian walkway areas. Please locate one 15-gallon shade tree in front of each of the nine buildings which shades the sidewalk. |
| 04/16/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-036 Olsen Condominiums 04/19/04 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Cragin - Keeling Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: April 21, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached (x) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 04/16/04 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 04/19/04 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN Olsen Condominiums S03-036 The applicant has stated that the site layout of the subdivision leaves no room to provide landscaping along walkways in front of each building. Given that the development is a relatively shallow infill project and that the applicant as more than adequately addressed issues regarding passive and active recreational uses and landscaping in the detention/retention area, no shade trees will be required along the sidewalks. |
| 04/21/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S03-036 Olsen Condominiums Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: April 21, 2004 DUE DATE: April 21, 2004 1. Per LUC 3.2.6.4, revise the required building setback to adjacent O-2 and O-3 zoned properties to be the height of exterior building wall. Dimension these setbacks on the plan correctly. The proposed patio covers near the north and south property lines do not appear meet the required building setback (Height) to adjacent O-2 and O-3 zones or to adjacent R-2 zoned property to the south (10 feet or ¾ height). Per LUC 3.2.6.4, an approved LDO application will be required. Provide copies of stamped approved LDO plans and approval letter. Upon approval of the LDO, place the case number, date of approval and conditions imposed on the plat as a general note. LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-03.2.2.B.6 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan, LDO approval. |
| 04/23/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the information for protected plant #19 on sheet NP-1 or NP-2 for consistency. 2) Revise the plan to clarify the proposed status of protected plan #12. The ability to preserve the tree in place per LUC 6.2.16 is jeopardized by the proposed detention basin. 3) Add a note to the landscape plan stating that landscaping proposed in the public right-of-way must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Seperate permits are reqiuired. |
| 05/13/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Needs Review |