Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-036
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | NO COMMENT S03-036 RICK ENGINEERING OLSEN CONDOMINIUMS |
| 01/05/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-037 COLINAS DE ORO PHASE II/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: January 5, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project on condition that: NOTE: Tentative Plat approved on condition that Section 4 is added to Township/Range in Title Block on Final Plat. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 01/06/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: January 5, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-036 Olsen Condominiums: TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 01/09/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-036 Olsen Condominiums 01/08/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Cragin - Keeling Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: January 15, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 01/04/04 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE Olsen Condominiums S03-036 The Design Guideline Manual states that detention/retention basins should be used for open space and as additional active or passive recreational amenities. It is encouraged that amenities such as; picnic tables, benches, barbecue, tot lot, etc. in the detention/retention area are provided. The Plant Schedule and Schedule of Amenity and Parking Area Landscape Plant Materials on landscape page 1 of 2 states that the Desert Willow trees are 5 gallons in size. The site plan on the same page shows the Desert Willow trees as being 15 gallons in size. Please correct so that both are alike. There are various discrepancies between the Plant Schedule and the Schedule of Amenity and Parking Area Landscape Plant Materials regarding the botanical names and the common names. Please correct so that both are alike. Below the Plan Schedule is “Indicates Plant to be Transplanted on Site” and Indicates Plant to be Protected in Place”. There is no additional information attributed to these two descriptions. Please indicate what these are describing. The Design Guidelines Manual states that shade trees should be located along pedestrian walkway areas. It is encouraged that a minimum of one 15-gallon shade tree along the sidewalk in front of each of the nine buildings is provided. |
| 01/15/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S03-036 Olsen Condominiums Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: January 15, 2004 DUE DATE: January 15, 2004 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before December 18, 2004. 2. Fill in the S03-036 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Condominium area is measured by a calculation of three- dimensional airspace. In addition to square footage and floor dimensions, provide the interior height and a calculation of airspace in cubic feet for each of the condos. 4. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of DS 2-03.6.6. 5. For clarity please label the purpose and dimensions of the boxes along the rear of and adjacent to the buildings. Please label existing units and extending into the front vehicle overhang areas of some of the parking spaces. It is unclear what they represent as they are not shown on the elevation drawing. Are they concrete stoops or pads? From the elevation drawing it does not appear that they are covered porches. Any covered porches must meet required perimeter yard building setbacks. 6. Add the number of lots to the title block. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 7. It is difficult to determine from the PAAL cross-section if the pedestrian sidewalks are physically separated from the vehicle use area. Sidewalks must be physically separated by concrete curbing or other means per DS 3-01.3.3.B.5. Please clarify / revise cross section as needed. DS 3-01.3.3.B.5 8. Detail any proposed freestanding lighting and signage on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.W 9. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan. PSMc\H\tentativeplats03\S03-036tpdprev1.doc |
| 01/16/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 February 10, 2004 TO: Colleen Stoetzel, Rick Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Brandon Matheson, E.I.T. Pima County Development Review (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Olsen Condominiums Development Plan / Tentative Plat Plan - 1st Submittal S03-036 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management (PCWWM) Department. This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. Separate review letters from PDEQ and PCWWM representatives will not be prepared for this project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. This project will be tributary to the Prince Road Interceptor and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response in not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. We have sent to your office under separate cover a Private Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of fixture units. The Sewer Service Agreements must be signed by the owner of record, notarized, and all three originals returned to this office before we can approve the Development Plan / Final Plat. 4. All Sheets: Add the Development Plan case number, S03-036, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 5. Add the following General Notes: Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of the Industrial Waste Ordinance (Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, as amended). Maintenance and operation of the private sanitary sewer to its point of connection to the public sanitary sewer is the responsibility of the property owner. 6. Revise General Note #17 to the following: On-site sanitary sewers will be private and will be constructed, operated and maintained on a private basis. The location and method of connection to an existing public sanitary sewer is subject to review and approval by the Pima County Wastewater Management Department at the time of submittal of plumbing or building plans. 7. Add sewer line size on sheet two. 8. Verify the sewer and water crossing clearance. 9. Provide minimum coverage of 4 feet on manhole #3 or provide a D.I.P. 10. We will require a revised Development Plan / Tentative Plat. 11. The next submittal of this project will be the second submittal. Please include a $100.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are added to the set of plans, or revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact Brandon Matheson at 740-6315. Brandon Matheson, E.I.T. Pima County Development BM/ST/dk Copy: Project |
| 01/16/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 01/16/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : S03-036 OLSEN CONDOMINIUMS/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE : January 16, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Correct Unit numbers to the proper format for residential condominiums (all first floor units are 100 series, all second floor units are 200 series). |
| 01/20/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise all plans as requested by other agencies and as indicated below. Resubmittal of all revised plans is required. 2) Show individual protected plants to be preserved in place on the landscape plan. 3) Include a legend for the plant symbols used on sheet NP-1. |
| 01/20/2004 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: January 20, 2004 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S03-036 Olsen Condominiums T131432 (112-05) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the number of units (1-9) to the title block and add the Common Area “A”. Add the number of miles of new road, public or private, even if the number is 0 to the general notes. Add dimensions and bearings for the units and the common area. Add tie lines from subdivision border to the units. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 01/21/2004 | DOROTHY ROBLES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | |
| 01/21/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this T.P. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 12/19/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/23/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved 12/23/03. |
| 12/30/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: December 29, 2003 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Olsen Condominiums Tentative Plat. The activity number is S03-036. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on December 20, 2003. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP, DR GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a recent Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert, 791-5550 for submittal requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal. 8. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. In the Title Block specify the number of proposed units. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 2. Place the subdivision case number (S03-036) on each sheet of the plat. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Add the note, "The following units are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain regulations: 1-18". DS 2-03.2.2.C.2.a 4. Place a note, "A Floodplain Use Permit and Finished Floor Elevation Certificates are required for buildings 1-9". DS 2-03.2.2.C.2.b 5. Place a note on the plan that the entire property lies within FEMA Special Flood Hazard Zone AE. DS 2-03.2.3.J 6. On Detail A Sheet 3 the northeast parcel corner tie to Olsen Ave. (29.96 ft.) needs a bearing. DS 2-03.2.3.A 7. Label the contour lines. There is not one contour line on the plat with an elevation label. DS 2-03.2.3.F.1 8. Each common area must be labeled individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area. Common areas with different uses, maintenance requirements, etc. must have separate designations. The Detention/Retention area must be a separate common area. DS 2-03.2.4.C Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.4.c 9. Sight visibility triangles must be drawn from curb line unless there is on-street parking. It does not appear that on-street parking is allowed on Olsen. Provide a letter from COT Transportation approving on-street parking or relocate the triangles. DS 3-01.5.2 10. Label and dimension from street center line to existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks. DS 2-03.2.4.F 11. Show radius of curb returns. Minimum is 18 ft. DS 3-01 Figure 6 12. Sidewalks within a development must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. The PAAL section shows the sidewalk at grade. 13. Provide proposed ground elevations at different points for reference to future grading and drainage. Show proposed drainage patterns. DS 2-03.2.4.L.4 14. A basin maintenance access ramp is required. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.4, 2.3.1.6.4.b 15. The WSEL shown on the plan says FEMA and COT. The correct designations are NGVD-29 and NAVD-88. Revise. 16. List weir invert elevation. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.4.a DRAINAGE REPORT 1. A soils report is required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. Percolation tests are required. Basins must drain within 12 hours. The report must also specify a minimum building setback limit from the basin. Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, SDRM, 3.5.1 2. A detailed basin maintenance checklist must be provided in the drainage report. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.A. James C. Tate, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer |