Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-033
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/25/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-033 Silverbell Vista 05/24/04 (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-11 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Tucson Mountain Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/31/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: (x) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan (x) Other: Agreement with adjacent property owners and building elevations REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 05/24/04 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Silverbell Vista, S03-33 – Third submittal Because this is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, and any of its components, including the Tucson Mountain Subregional Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual. In addition, the allowance of the RCP is based on the purpose to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential developments. 1. Condition 3 states that all detention/retention and common areas shall be designed as useable passive and active open spaces and shall be constructed to appear as natural as possible. According to the plat, Common Areas “A” has severe slopes, however, Common Areas “B” are relatively flat and can be used for picnic and barbecue areas, tot lots, etc. Please locate active open space amenities in Common Areas “B” on the landscape site plan. 2. Condition 8 states that building elevations shall be submitted for CDRC review and approval. Please submit the building elevations. 3. Condition 9 states that an appropriate mix of building facades and roof lines are required. The condition also states that building facades and rooflines of units visible from Silverbell Road and those located on lots 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40 must be reviewed in the context to verify compliance with this condition. Please submit appropriate details of the proposed building facades and rooflines of the above-mentioned lots. 4. Condition 10 states that the owner/developer shall contact the owners/developers of the adjacent properties on the west side of Silverbell Road to design a cohesive landscape, drainage, and architectural treatment of the site. For the applicable reviews of the submitted plans, the required correspondence is needed to determine if the landscape, drainage, and architectural treatment of the area has been reviewed and agreed upon by the appropriate owners/developers. Please submit the required correspondence, that includes the agreed upon cohesive landscape, drainage, and architectural treatment of this overall area. 5. Condition 19 states that all walls visible from a public right-of-way (and adjacent existing residential areas) are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatments. Please state that the wall will be graffiti-resistant and what design treatments will be used. Please show this information on the two details. |
| 05/28/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/02/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross, CDRC SUBJECT: Silverbell Vista REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 1 June 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S03-033 T13S, R13E, Section 33 Resubmittals Required: Revised Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes. A revised Drainage Report and Tentative Plat addressing the comments below must be resubmitted. The following comments must be addressed prior to recommendation for approvals: TENTATIVE PLAT: 1. Please omit the proposed 15' access easement at the northeast corner of the site. A maintenance access easement will not be required for the collector channel. 2. The Average Cross Slope (ACS) of the areas to be developed must be less than 15% if applying for the Residential Cluster Project option, described in the City of Tucson's Land Use Code (LUC) Section 2.8.1.6 C. ACS calculations should reflect only those areas to be developed, excluding Natural Areas. If the method described in Section 2.8.1.6 A 2 is selected, all areas of 15% slopes or greater, except natural areas, must be delineated on the plat. 3. Please refer to LUC Sections 2.8.1.7 and 2.8.1.8 for all Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) submittal and development requirements. Note that Natural Areas shall meet the requirement outlined in Section 2.8.1.7. The plat may not be recommended for approval prior to demonstration/depiction of conformance with these requirements. DRAINAGE REPORT: 1. The response to previous comment #2 states that a section regarding sediment monitoring and removal has been added to the report under channel and basin maintenance responsibilities (Section 3.7). Such discussion could not be found in this section of the report. Please provide a revised report addressing this maintenance responsibility/liability. NOTE: Formal submittal for floodplain use permits must occur through the standard permit application process. A floodplain use permit application must be completed and submitted through Customer Service. The application may be included/submitted with a completed grading permit application, 1 copy of the Tentative Plat, 3 sets of grading plans and 3 sets of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) with text. Please assure the submittal includes signed copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) forwarded to Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and owner/operator certifications, at a minimum, in addition to the minimum SWPPP content requirements outlined in the "construction SWPPP checklist", accessible at: http://www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 06/09/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: Silverbell Vista RCP S03-033 Tentative Plat 3rd review TRANSMITTAL: May 26, 2004 DUE DATE: May 31, 2004 1. The Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) application must be approved before the tentative plat can be approved. As noted in response comment 3, once approved, include the SCZ case number, date of approval, approved colors and conditions in the general notes. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 2. The required street perimeter yard building setbacks are based on the greater of 21 feet or the height of exterior structure wall. Because max building heights are proposed to be as much as 24 feet per general note 28, revise required setback dimensions on all details (including MS&R setback dimension and interior street setback dimension on RCP sheet 1 of 1 and on plat sheet 2 of 5) to read "greater of 21' or (H)". Provide 4-sided elevation drawings of the various models to help demonstrate how houses will comply with building setback requirements and to meet rezoning condition #8. LUC 3.2.6.5 DS 2-05.2.4.U 3. Add the sheet number (2) to the pavement detail labels in street cross section details 1, 2 and 3 on sheet 2. 4. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 3 by showing the types and labeling on the tentative plat the location of active and passive amenities to be provided within the common areas. Also, per RCP note 12 show the location of the pedestrian and handicap access connections to these common area passive and active open spaces on the plat. DS 2-05.2.4.U 5. Show on a detail drawing on the tentative plat how barrier-free access will be provided to the handicapped accessible units. DS 2-10.3.1.D 6. Add all applicable reference case numbers, including annexation case number, rezoning case number and Scenic Corridor case number,to the RCP sheet 1 of 1. DS 2-05.2.1.K If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |