Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-025
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/08/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: OFFICES AT RILLITO CROSSING Lots 1-14, Condominium Units 101-105, 201-209 & 301-308 S03-025 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review dated December 1, 2003. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 884-3879 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 770-2002 |
| 12/10/2003 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Offices at Rillito Crossing S03-025, T13S, R14E, SECTION 27 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on December 03, 2003 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: The Drainage Report is acceptable for Development Plan purposes. Additional drainage related information may be required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Plan: 1. It appears that the Rezoning Conditions shown on the Development Plan are not the approved conditions. Provide the Rezoning Conditions that were approved by Mayor and Council on February 12, 2002. 2. Verification of compliance with Rezoning Conditions "5.E and F" is required before the Development Plan can be approved. If the required improvements are not planned to be installed at the present, either provide a verification of meeting the monetary contribution requirement or obtain a letter from Pima County, which states that the County will not assess the Developer or the City of Tucson for part of the improvements cost. 3. Verification of compliance with Rezoning Condition 12 is required before the Development Plan can be approved. Submit a copy of the finalized dedication agreement to verify compliance. Landscape Plan: The Landscape Plan is recommended for approval pertaining to drainage and engineering. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan |
| 12/12/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-025 OFFICES AT RILLITO CROSSING/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: December 4, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 12/12/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing Tentative Plat/Development Plan 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: December 12, 2003 DUE DATE: December 16, 2003 1. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 17, which requires dumpsters and loading spaces to be at least 50 feet from residentially zoned or developed property, by dimensioning the westernmost loading zone and dumpster from adjacent SR zoned property (at its closest point). The loading spaces (also see comment 2) and one of the proposed dumpsters are shown to be less than 50 feet from adjacent SR zoned properties. Also, the setback of easternmost loading zone from the east property line is dimensioned at 50 feet but it scales to only 46 feet on the drawing. Please revise. If the dumpsters/loading spaces are to be located closer than 50 feet to any adjacent SR zoned properties the proposal must be scheduled to be heard before Mayor and Council as a change of rezoning condition. 2. The calculations indicate that 3 loading zones are required and provided, but only 2 are shown on the drawing. Please revise. Note that one loading zone may not block access to or exit from another loading zone. LUC 3.4.4 3. Bldg 2 does not appear to meet perimeter yard bldg setbacks to adjacent SR zoned property. Dimension its distance (at closest points) to the west property line. It is understood that an LDO application process has been initiated. Upon approval of the LDO, place the case number, date of approval and conditions imposed on the plat. LUC 3.2.6.4 4. Revise to make all the Rezoning Conditions shown on the Development Plan are to be consistent with those approved by Mayor and Council for rezoning case #C9-01-030. 5. Add the docket and page numbers for recordation of the dedication of the Rillito River linear park. 6. Per IBC Sec. 1106.4, and per Dept. of Justice Disability Rights Section, one in every eight (and fraction of eight) handicapped parking space must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet. Please revise drawing to show a minimum of two van accessible spaces w/8' aisles, and add a detail showing the van accessible space with 8-foot aisle width. IBC Sec.1106.4 ADA 4.1.2(5)(b) 7. Dimension building setback from edge of travel lane along Paradise Falls Drive for bldgs 1 and 8. LUC 3.2.6.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan. |
| 12/17/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: December 19, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-025 Offices at Rillitio Crossing: RTP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the resubmitted tentative plat and has the following comments: The landscape plans for the Rillito River Park segment to be constructed as a part of the subject project need the following adjustments: The decomposed granite trail should be located to a greater degree(a few feet) within the 50' corridor provided as a part of this project. The trail should meander more. An insufficient number of trees are shown on the plan. Add trees along and between both the paved path and trail and within the additional 50' corridor. The goal is to provide a consistent canopy of trees along the paths for shade and aesthetic purposes. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 12/17/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Conditions of rezoning require dedication of a 25' wide public access easement along the Alvernon and Walnut Washes revise all plans to include this easement. Provide additional recording information. 2) Clarify the type of screening proposed for the parking areas along Paradise Falls Drive. The notes specify a screen wall, while the plans show vegetative screening. The required minimum height of the screen is 5', rather than 3'. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3) Revise the plans to include a screen wall for the west parking area, the wall may not be located in the 25' wide public access easement. The screening is required based on the adjacent zoning, regardless of whether the property is developed for residential use. |
| 12/17/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing 12/25/03 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-1-30 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/07/03 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 12/08/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Review S03-025 - Offices at Rillito Crossing: Tentative Plat Review December 25, 2003 Rezoning C9-01-30, condition # 4, must be in compliance prior to the approval of the tentative plat. Construction delays to the Alvernon Way extension project, located adjacent to the site is a critical component to the viability of this project. Verification of rezoning condition #4 must be satisfactory to the Department of Transportation prior to the release of any portion of the development. Any delays in the completion of the arterial right-of-ways required to carry out the non-residential traffic will further impact the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Therefore, the Comprehensive Planning Task Force staff offers the following comments. 1. Please resubmit with documentation from the Department of Transportation of development in compliance to rezoning C9-01-30, condition # 4 (see rezoning conditions). 2. Please resubmit with documentation from both Pima County and the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation for compliance with rezoning C9-01-30, condition #12 (see rezoning conditions). |