Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-025
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/10/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/11/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Tentative Plat is approved 9/11/03. |
| 09/17/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 November 24, 2003 TO: Steven Gregor, P.E., Gregor & Grenier Engineering, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Offices at Rillito Crossing, Lots 1-14, Condominium Units 101-105, 201-209 & 301-308 and Common Area A Tentative Plat / Development Plan S03-025 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. This project will be tributary to both the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our records for Rillito Crossing, Blocks 1 & 2, under case number S02-041, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. All Sheets: Add the subdivision plat case number, S03-025, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. 4. Sheet 1: The proposed on-site sewage collection lines must be privately operated and maintained. PCWWM will not accept these line into the public sewer system. Revise General Note 8 to read: ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 5. Sheet 1: Add a General note that reads: A PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND CONTROL OF ALL PRIVATE SEWERS. 6. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PIMA COUNTY DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IS REQUIRED BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. APPROVAL OF THIS TENTATIVE PLAT / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 7. Sheet 2: All lettering on development plan must be 1/8" in height, or more, to be legible when the development plan is scanned. Show the size of proposed public sewer line G-2003-005 in numerals at least 1/8" in height. 8. Sheet 2: Remove the sewer plan number, G-2003-005, from the label for the scupper and place it near and parallel to the sewer line it references. 9. Sheet 2: Show the 38.00' stub from SMH #5, per the approved plans for G-2003-005. Revise Keynote 4 as necessary. 10. Sheet 2: Show the rim elevation of SMH #5 in G-2003-005. 11. Sheet 2: Show the proposed Building Connection Sewer line from each building, labeled with its size and the letters, BCS. 12. Subject to the above, the tentative plat / development plan is hereby approved. The required revisions may be shown on the Mylars. 13. Please note that formal Sewer Service Agreement will be required for this project during the final plat process. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 09/17/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S03-025 GREGOR & GRENIER ENGINEERING, INC. OFFICES AT RILLITO CROSSING |
| 09/17/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-025 OFFICES AT RILLITO CROSSING / TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 15, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Correct Book 54, Page 41 to Book 57, Page 41 in Title Block. 2: Correct Rillito Crossing Drive to Paradise Falls Drive on Sheets 2 and 3. 3: Correct Condo Unit Numbers in Buildings 2 and 3. 1st Floor unit numbers are one hundred series and second floor unit numbers are two hundred series. The condominium Units will need to be corrected in the Title Block also. |
| 10/02/2003 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Offices at Rillito Crossing S03-025, T13S, R14E, SECTION 27 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on September 10, 2003 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: 1. Since the Rillito River bank protection is not built to the 100-year floodplain level, the Rillito River erosion hazard setback has to be determined based on the existing soil type. Additionally, stabilizing the proposed slope along the north property line with riprap is not sufficient to reduce the erosion hazard set without the recommendation of Geotechnical Engineer. 2. Show the water harvesting areas and how you propose to convey onsite runoff to the proposed water harvesting basins. 3. Fig 5 shows that the Rillito Cross Drive CBC is 7-10'X6'; the text in the report states that the size is 6-12'X8'. Which one is correct? 4. The proposed riprap lined swale should have some kind of barricades at the inlet to prevent vehicular access. 5. The project has to be designed based on the existing FEMA 100-year floodplain limits including any required encroachment analysis and finished floor determination. Once the submitted LOMR and CLOMR are approved and the FIRM's are revised accordingly, the project can proceed as submitted. 6. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement and include any design calculations in drainage report. Development Plan: 1. Provide the complete S03-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1. 2. Add a general note stating that this project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations and it requires a floodplain use permit for the proposed fill (D.S. 2-03.2.2.C.2.a & b). 3. Describe all monuments as found or set as required by D.S. 2-03.2.3.A. 4. The provided contour do not have the ground elevation, which makes it difficult to determine the existing drainage patterns and compliance with the differential grading requirements especially for the two buildings on the east side (D.S.2-03.2.3.F). 5. It appears that buildings 2, 7, 8 and 9 do not have nearby dumpsters. It also appears that it may be easier for the garbage collection to have building "5" dumpster face the other direction. Address these two issues. 6. Provide the 100-year flood water surface elevations as required by D.S.2-03.2.4.L.6. 7. Show the sight visibility triangles as required by D.S.2-03.2.4.M. and D.S. 3-01.5.1.A.1. 8. Verify compliance with Rezoning Condition "5.E & F", "8 & 9" and "12" 9. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk. This also applies to roof drainage. Show proposed roof drainage and demonstrate compliance with this requirement. Landscape Plan: 1. Show the sight visibility triangles to ensure that the project is in compliance with the requirements of D.S. 3-01.5.1.A.1. 2. Show water-harvesting basins. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Drainage Report, Development Plan and Landscape Plan |
| 10/03/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: OFFICES AT RILLITO CROSSING Lots 1-14, Condominium Units 101-105, 201-209 & 301-308 S03-025 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated September 9, 2003. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are existing easements within the boundaries of the development. The easement recording information must be properly shown on the plat prior to approval. The information given on the submitted tentative plat is not correct. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com (520) 884-3882 |
| 10/07/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: October 7, 2003 DUE DATE: October 7, 2003 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before October 6, 2004. 2. Fill in the S03-025 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Indicate the adjacent zoning to the east (SR) on sheet 2 of 4 of the plat map. DS 2-03.2.4.D 4. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 3 by indicating the location of any no parking signs on the plat. 5. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 17, which requires dumpsters and loading spaces to be at least 50 feet from residentially zoned or developed property, by dimensioning them from adjacent SR zoned property. Some of the proposed dumpsters and loading spaces are shown to be less than 50 feet from adjacent SR properties. Please revise. 6. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 16 by showing the location, orientation and height of all proposed freestanding lighting. 7. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 6 by providing a copy of recorded vehicular and pedestrian shared access agreement. Add a general note stating the docket and page of the shared access agreement. DS 2-03.2.4.F 8. Remove the reference to Section 34 in the Location map legal description. The subject property falls entirely within Section 27. DS 2-03.2.1.D 9. Condominium area is measured by a calculation of three- dimensional airspace. In addition to square footage and floor dimensions, provide the interior height and a calculation of airspace in cubic feet for each of the condos. 10. Per IBC Sec. 1106.4, one handicapped parking space must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet. Please revise drawing, which shows no van accessible parking provided for the project, and add a detail showing the van accessible space with 8-foot aisle width. ANS/IBC 11. Dimension the depth of the vehicle backup spur located at the southeast corner of the parking lot (south of building 3) and the distance between the backup spur and any obstruction over 6 inches in height the existing fence along the east property line. A minimum 3-foot deep backup spur is required and a minimum of 3 feet is required between the end of the spur and an obstruction to allow for vehicle overhang. Note, per comment 11 that the loading zone may not be located at the end of the backup spur. DS 3-05.2.2.D 12. On projects containing more than one building, loading zones must be provided for each building. However, in this case because of the general campus style of this project, three loading zones will be considered sufficient provided that a loading zone is added in closer proximity to bldg. 2, which is the largest building on the site. Because there is not adequate maneuverability for trucks to access the loading zone proposed at the south of bldg 3, and because loading zones may not be placed behind backup spurs, this loading zone should be removed and one should instead be provided on the north side of bldg. 3 to allow convenient service to both bldgs. 2 and 3. Please revise. LUC 3.4.4.1 13. On sheet 2 of 4, bldg 3 is said to contain 7,600 sq. ft, but in the building/parking data on sheet 1 of 4 it reads 17,600 sq. ft. Please revise to be consistent. 14. On sheet 2 of 4, Pad 4 is said to contain 5,600 sq. ft, but in the building/parking data on sheet 1 of 4 it reads 5,400 sq. ft. Please revise to be consistent. 15. The bicycle parking calculation states that 16 class 1 and 12 class 2 spaces are required and provided however, 15 class 1 and 14 class 2 spaces are labeled on the drawing. Please revise to be consistent with the calcs. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 16. Bldgs 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 do not appear to meet perimeter yard setbacks to adjacent SR zoned property. Please revise and dimension setbacks on the drawing. Also, dimension building setback from edge of travel lane along Rillito Crossing Drive for pad 4. LUC 3.2.6.4 LUC 3.2.6.5 17. To be consistent with rezoning conditions 11 and 12, add the name of the wash (Walnut Wash) along the eastern boundary of the site on sheet 2 of 4 of the plat map. 18. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of DS 2-03.6.6. 19. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan. |
| 10/07/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Six-foot high masonry walls are required to screen the refuse storage areas and loading areas from adjacent residential properties. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2) Parking lots on the site are required to be screened from adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3) Note 8 on sheet 1 of the landscape plan indicates that a temporary irrigation system will be installed. Revise to indicate that the installation is to be permanent. DS 2-06.5.4 4) Revise note 7 on sheet 3 of the landscape plan to clarify who is the party responsible for landscape/irrigation maintenance. LUC 3.7.6 |
| 10/08/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this T.P. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 10/08/2003 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 RICK LYONS ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: October 7, 2003 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the bearings for the lots. Add ties to the perimeter boundary. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 10/10/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing 10/09/03 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-1-30 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/07/03 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 10/07/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Review S03-025 – Offices at Rillito Crossing: Tentative Plat Review Oct. 8, 2003 Comprehensive Planning Task Force staff offers the following comments: Please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition # 1, which states that the development plan shall be in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan. The preliminary development plan provides a pedestrian link between the on-site pedestrian circulation system of the office/retail complex and the Rillito River Park. Please revise plans to comply with this requirement by providing a centralized link between the eight-foot DG path located within the Rillito River Park and the site, as shown on the preliminary development plan. Please provide a written agreement from the Pima County Parks/Recreation Department and the City of Tucson Parks/Recreation Department to satisfy rezoning condition # 12. Please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to comply with rezoning condition # 18. A loading space is shown to be located at the southeast corner of this project at approximately ten feet from the east property line. This site abuts residentially zoned property on the eastern edge and the dumpsters and loading spaces are required to be a minimum of fifty (50) feet from a residentially used or zoned property. |
| 10/14/2003 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org S03-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing 10/6/2003 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Alvernon (Grant to Ft. Lowell) No 0 19,400 43,000 4 43,000 31,919 4 1,195 Route 11, 15 minutes,0.6 miles None Fort Lowell (Dodge to Alvernon) No 0 34,500 43,000 4 42,728 43,000 4 Route 34,30 Minutes,0.6 miles None |
| 10/14/2003 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Also reference to the new docket and page to the existing linear park as follows: Docket______, Page______. Fill in blanks once deed is recorded |
| 10/15/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: October 14, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S02-025 Offices at Rillito Crossing: TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services The 8 ft path in the river park should meander more and be located more within the 53 ft corridor. 10 ft paths along east and west sides of development: Show transitions and linkages with paths, sidewalks, curbs, roadways. Indicate all drainages shall be directed below pathways. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |